Abstract
The validation and assessment of Envisat advanced synthetic aperture radar (ASAR) ocean wave spectra products are important to their application in ocean wave numerical predictions. Six-year ASAR wave spectra data are compared with one-dimensional (1D) wave spectra of 55 co-located moored buoy observations in the northern Pacific Ocean. The ASAR wave spectra data are firstly quality control filtered and spatio-temporal matched with buoy data. The comparisons are then performed in terms of 1D wave spectra, significant wave height (SWH) and mean wave period (MWP) in different spatio-temporal offsets respectively. SWH comparison results show the evident dependence of SWH biases on wind speed and the ASAR SWH saturation effect. The ASAR wave spectra tend to underestimate SWH at high wind speeds and overestimate SWH at low wind speeds. MWP comparison results show that MWP has a systematic bias and therefore it should be bias-modified before used. The comparisons of 1D wave spectra show that both wave spectra agree better at low frequencies than at high frequencies, which indicates the ASAR data cannot resolve the high frequency waves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdalla S, Bidlot J R, Janssen P. 2006. Global validation and assimilation of Envisat ASAR wave mode spectra. Proc. of SEASAR 2006, Frascati, Italy, p. 8.1.
Caires S, Sterl A, Gommenginger C P. 2005. Global ocean mean wave period data: validation and description. J. Geophys. Res. 110: C02003, doi: 10.1029/2004JC002631.
Durrant T H, Greenslade D J M, Simmonds I. 2009. Validation of Jason-1 and Envisat remotely sensed wave heights. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26(1): 123–134.
Janssen P A E M, Abdalla S, Bidlot J R. 2007. Envisat wind and wave products: monitoring, validation and assimilation. Proc. of Envisat Symposium 2007, Montreux, Switzerland, ESA SP-636.
Johnsen H, Chapron B, Walker N, Desnos Y L. 2002a. The ASAR wave mode: level 1 and level 2 algorithms and products. Proc. of Envisat Calibration Review, Noordwijk, Netherlands, ESA SP-520.
Johnsen H, Engen G, Chapron B, Walker N, Closa J. 2002b. Validation of ASAR wave mode level 2 product. Proc. of Envisat Validation Workshop, Frascati, Italy, p. 9.
Johnsen H, Engen G, Collard F, Kerbaol V, Chapron B. 2006. Envisat ASAR wave mode products-quality assessment and algorithm upgrade. Proc. of SEASAR 2006, Frascati, Italy, ESA SP-613.
Kerbaol V, Johnsen H, Chapron B, Rosich B. 2004. Quality assessment of Envisat ASAR wave mode products based on regional and seasonal comparisons with WAM model outputs. Proc. of ENVISAT/ERS Symposium, Salzburg, Austria, ESA-572.
Li J G, Holt M. 2009. Comparison of Envisat ASAR ocean wave spectra with buoy and altimeter data via a wave model. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26(3): 593–614.
Voorrips A C, Mastenbroek C, Hansen B. 2001. Validation of two algorithms to retrieve ocean wave spectra from ERS synthetic aperture radar. J. Geophys. Res., 106(C8): 16 825–16 840.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the Special Fund for Marine Commonweal Scientific Research of China (No. 200705027)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, Q., Zhang, J., Meng, J. et al. Comparison and analysis of Envisat ASAR ocean wave spectra with buoy data in the northern Pacific Ocean. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 29, 10–17 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-011-9926-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-011-9926-8