Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of DNA extraction and universal primers on 16S rRNA gene-based DGGE analysis of a bacterial community from fish farming water

  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among many reports investigating microbial diversity from environmental samples with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), limited attention has been given to the effects of universal primers and DNA extraction on the outcome of DGGE analysis. In this study, these effects were tested with 16S rRNA gene-based DGGE on a bacterial community from farming water samples. The results indicate that the number of discernable bands in the DGGE fingerprint differed with the primer pairs used; the bands produced by 63f/518r, 341f/926r and 933f/1387r primer pairs were obviously fewer than those by 968f/1401r. Also, we found that each DNA extraction method resulted in different community profiles, reflected by the number and intensity of bands in the DGGE fingerprint. Furthermore, the main bands (theoretically representing dominant bacteria) differed with the extraction methods applied. It is therefore believed that the effects of universal primers and DNA extraction should be given more attention and carefully chosen before performing an investigation into a new environment with DGGE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araya, R., K. Tani, T. Takagi, N. Yamaguchi and M. Nasu, 2003. Bacterial activity and community composition in stream water and biofilm from an urban river determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization and DGGE analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 43: 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahllof, I., H. Baillie and S. Kjekkeberg, 2000. rpoB-based microbial community analysis avoids limitations inherent in 16S rRNA gene intraspecies heterogeneity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 3376–3380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, F. F., A. S. Rosado, G. V. Sebastian, R. Casella, P. Machado, C. Holmström, S. Jelleberg, J. D. van Elsas and L. Seldin, 2004. Impact of oil contamination and biostimulation on the diversity of indigenous bacterial communities in soil microcosms. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 48: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalia, A., A. Rattan and P. Chopra, 1999. A method for extraction of high-quality and high-quantity genomic DNA generally applicable to pathogenic bacteria. Anal. Biochem. 275: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M., J. H. Gong, M. Cottrill, H. Yu, C. Lange, J. Burton and E. Topp, 2003. Evaluation of QIAamp® DNA stool mini kit for ecological studies of gut microbiota. J. Microbiol. Methods 54: 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liesack, W., H. Weyland and E. Stackebrandt, 1991. Potential risks of gene amplification by PCR as determined by 16S rDNA analysis of a mixed-culture of strict basophilic bacteria. Microbiol. Ecol. 21: 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipthay, J. R., C. Enzinger, K. Johnsen, J. Aamand and S. J. Sørensen, 2004. Impact of DNA extraction method on bacterial community composition measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36: 1 607–1 614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchesi, J.R., T. Sato, A. J. Weightman, T. A. Martin, J. Fry, S. J. Hiom and W. G Wade, 1998. Design and evaluation of useful bacterium-specific PCR primers that amplify genes coding for bacterial 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 795–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Laurent, F., L. Philippot, S. Hallet, R. Chaussed, J. C. Germon and G Soulas, 2001. DNA extraction from soils: old bias from new microbial diversity analysis methods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 2 354–2 359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massana, R. M. and C. Pedrós-Alió, 2000. Spatial differences in bacterioplankton composition along the Catalan cost (NW Mediterranean) assessed by molecular fingerprinting. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 33: 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • More, M. I., J. B. Herrick, M. C. Silva, W. C. Ghiorse and E. L. Madsen, 1994. Quantitative cell lysis of indigenous microorganisms and rapid extraction of microbial DNA from sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 1 572–1 580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mota, F. F., E. A. Gomes, E. Paiva and L. Seldia, 2005. Assessment of the diversity of Paenibaccillus species in environmental samples by a novel rpoB-based PCR-DGGE method. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 53: 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer, G. and K. Smalla, 1998. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) in microbial ecology. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. Gen. Mol. Methods 56: 365–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orisini, M. and V. Romano-Spica, 2001. A microwave-based method for nucleic acid isolation from environmental samples. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 33: 17–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rombaut, G., G. Suantika, N. Boon, S. Maertens, P. Dhert, E. Top, P. Sorgeloos and W. Verstraete, 2001. Monitoring of the evolving diversity of the microbial community present in rotifer cultures. Aquaculture 198: 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stach, E. M. J., S. Bathe, J.P. Clapp and R.G. Burns, 2001. PCR-SSCP comparison of 16S rDNA sequence diversity in soil DNA obtained using different isolation and purification methods. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 36: 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, M. T. and S. J. Giovannoni, 1996. Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 625–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacâo, M., A. Moura, A. Alves, I. Henriques, M. J. Saavedra and A. Correia, 2005. Evaluation of 16S rDNA-and gyrB-DGGE for typing members of the genus Aeromonas. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 246: 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochimchuk, T., J. Fotheringham, E. Topp, H. Schraft and K.T. Leung, 2003. Comparison of DNA extraction and purification methods to detect Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle manure. J. Microbiol. Methods 54: 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Wintzingerode, F., O. Landt, A. Ehrlich and U. B. GÓbel, 2000. Peptide nucleic acid-mediated PCR clamping as a useful supplement in the determination of microbial diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 549–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, K., Y. Kodama and S. Harayama, 2001. Design and evaluation of PCR primers to amplify bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA fragments used for community fingerprinting. J. Microbiol. Methods 44: 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hu Chaoqun  (胡超群).

Additional information

This work was funded by the Special Scientific Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. A305030301) and was partly supported by a grant from KLFEE, Ministry of Agriculture (2003-04).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luo, P., Hu, C., Zhang, L. et al. Effects of DNA extraction and universal primers on 16S rRNA gene-based DGGE analysis of a bacterial community from fish farming water. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 25, 310–316 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-007-0310-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-007-0310-7

Keyword

Navigation