Abstract
In recent years more and more multi-array logging tools, such as the array induction and the array lateralog, are applied in place of conventional logging tools resulting in increased resolution, better radial and vertical sounding capability and other features. Multi-array logging tools acquire several times more individual measurements than conventional logging tools. In addition to new information contained in these data, there is a certain redundancy among the measurements. The sum of the measurements actually composes a large matrix. Providing the measurements are error-free, the elements of this matrix show certain consistencies. Taking advantage of these consistencies, an innovative method is developed to detect and correct errors in the array resistivity logging tool raw measurements, and evaluate the quality of the data. The method can be described in several steps. First, data consistency patterns are identified based on the physics of the measurements. Second, the measurements are compared against the consistency patterns for error and bad data detection. Third, the erroneous data are eliminated and the measurements are re-constructed according to the consistency patterns. Finally, the data quality is evaluated by comparing the raw measurements with the re-constructed measurements. The method can be applied to all array type logging tools, such as array induction tool and array resistivity tool. This paper describes the method and illustrates its application with the High Definition Lateral Log (HDLL, Baker Atlas) instrument. To demonstrate the efficiency of the method, several field examples are shown and discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archie, G. E., 1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. J. Petroleum Technol. 5: 54–62.
Frenkel, M. A. and Z. Zhou, 2000. Improved estimation of hydrocarbon reserves using High-Definition Lateral Log array data in vertical and highly deviated wells. Presented at the 2000 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 1–4. SPE Paper 62912.
Itskovich, G. B., A. G. Mezzatesta, K. M. Strack and L. A. Tabarovsky, 1998. High-definition lateral log-resistivity device: basic physics and resolution. In: SPWLA 39th Annual Logging Symposium Transactions: Society of Professional Well Log Analysts. Paper V, 1–12.
Hakvoort, R. G., A. Fabris, M. A. Frenkel and A. M. Loermans, 1998. Field measurements and inversion results of the High-Definition Lateral Log. In: SPWLA 39th Annual Logging Symposium Transactions: Society of Professional Well Log Analysts Paper C, 1–12
Head, E. L., J. Seydoux and J. Perkins, 1993. A new technique for log quality control. In: 15th European Formation Evaluation Symposium Transactions: Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Norwegian Chapter. Paper K, 1–12.
Jericevic, Z., A. Fabris, M. Frenkel and Z. Zhou, 2000. Robust computation of focused resistivity curves from high definition lateral log data. In: SPWLA 41st. Ann. Log. Symp. Transactions. Paper F, 1–12.
Roy, A., 1981. Focused resistivity logs. In: Fitch, A. A. editor, Developments in Geophysical Exploration Methods. Appl Sci Publ, London, New York, Chapter 3. P61–94.
Schoen, J. H., 1988. Application of numerical methods on resistivity logs. In: The 11th European Formation Evaluation Symp. Transactions. Paper S, P1–16.
Zhang, Z. and Z. Zhou, 2002. Real-time quasi-2-D inversion of array resistivity logging data using neural networks. Geophysics 67: 517–524.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rabinowitz, P.D., Zhou, Z. Array processing—a new method to detect and correct errors on array resistivity logging tool measurements. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 25, 51–58 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-007-0051-7
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-007-0051-7