Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measurement of acetylene concentration in laminar flat flames by diode laser cavity ring-down spectroscopy

  • Research
  • Published:
Applied Physics B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continuous-wave cavity ring-down spectroscopy (cw-CRDS) has been applied to measure trace gas concentration in situ in flames using a near-infrared diode laser. Acetylene concentration was measured in laminar flat flames of premixed ethylene and air at atmospheric pressure for a range of fuel–air ratios. This was achieved by recording CRDS spectra of the P17e feature of acetylene near 1535 nm. The resulting concentration profiles show higher acetylene concentrations for increasing equivalence ratio. Downstream of the reaction zone, a trend of decreasing acetylene concentration with increasing height above the burner surface was observed in each of the flames studied. This would be consistent with the consumption of acetylene in the formation and growth of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and soot. Extinction data are also reported and reveal significant broadband optical losses in the richer flames, including prior to the onset of soot formation, which may be attributable to near-infrared absorption by aromatic species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Samoli et al., Associations of short-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution with cardiovascular and respiratory hospital admissions in London, UK. Occup. Environ. Med. 73(5), 300–307 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W.-J. Guan et al., Impact of air pollution on the burden of chronic respiratory diseases in China: time for urgent action. Lancet 388(10054), 1939–1951 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Drinovec et al., The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8(5), 1965–1979 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Wang, Formation of nascent soot and other condensed-phase materials in flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 33(1), 41–67 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H.A. Michelsen, Probing soot formation, chemical and physical evolution, and oxidation: a review of in situ diagnostic techniques and needs. Proc. Combust. Inst. 36(1), 717–735 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Desgroux et al., Comparative study of the soot formation process in a “nucleation” and a “sooting” low pressure premixed methane flame. Combust. Flame 184, 153–166 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E.K. Yapp et al., Numerical simulation and parametric sensitivity study of optical band gap in a laminar co-flow ethylene diffusion flame. Combust. Flame 167, 320–334 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Richter, J.B. Howard, Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their growth to soot—a review of chemical reaction pathways. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 26(4), 565–608 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.A. Miller, C.F. Melius, Kinetic and thermodynamic issues in the formation of aromatic compounds in flames of aliphatic fuels. Combust. Flame 91(1), 21–39 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Wagner et al., TDLAS-based in situ measurement of absolute acetylene concentrations in laminar 2D diffusion flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 32(1), 839–846 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Fuest et al., Quantitative acetylene measurements in laminar and turbulent flames using 1D Raman/Rayleigh scattering. Combust. Flame 162(5), 2248–2255 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B.A. Williams, J.W. Fleming, Laser-induced fluorescence detection of acetylene in low-pressure propane and methane flames. Appl. Phys. B 75(8), 883–890 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R.P. Lucht, R.L. Farrow, R.E. Palmer, Acetylene measurements in flames by coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering. Combust. Sci. Technol. 45(5–6), 261–274 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Z.S. Li et al., Mid-infrared polarization spectroscopy of C2H2: non-intrusive spatial-resolved measurements of polyatomic hydrocarbon molecules for combustion diagnostics. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31(1), 817–824 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Z.W. Sun et al., Quantitative C2H2 measurements in sooty flames using mid-infrared polarization spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. B 101(1), 423–432 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J.J. Scherer et al., Determination of methyl radical concentrations in a methane/air flame by infrared cavity ringdown laser absorption spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 107(16), 6196–6203 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Gersen, A.V. Mokhov, H.B. Levinsky, Extractive probe/TDLAS measurements of acetylene in atmospheric-pressure fuel-rich premixed methane/air flames. Combust. Flame 143(3), 333–336 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J.H. Miller et al., Measurements of hydrogen cyanide and its chemical production rate in a laminar methane/air, non-premixed flame using cw cavity ringdown spectroscopy. Proc. Combust. Inst. 29, 2203–2209 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Apicella et al., The effect of temperature on soot properties in premixed ethylene flames. Combust. Sci. Technol. 191(9), 1558–1570 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A.M. Bennett et al., Soot formation in laminar flames of ethylene/ammonia. Combust. Flame 220, 210–218 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Saggese et al., Probe effects in soot sampling from a burner-stabilized stagnation flame. Combust. Flame 167, 184–197 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. N. Hansen et al., Investigation of sampling-probe distorted temperature fields with X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37(2), 1401–1408 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. N. Hansen et al., 2D-imaging of sampling-probe perturbations in laminar premixed flames using Kr X-ray fluorescence. Combust. Flame 181, 214–224 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Lamoureux, P. Desgroux, In situ laser-induced fluorescence and ex situ cavity ring-down spectroscopy applied to NO measurement in flames: microprobe perturbation and absolute quantification. Energy Fuels 35(9), 7107–7120 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. G.S. Humphries, I.S. Burns, M. Lengden, Application of continuous-wave cavity ring-down spectroscopy to laminar flames. IEEE Photonics J. 8(1), 3900110 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Huang, K.K. Lehmann, CW cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) with a semiconductor optical amplifier as intensity modulator. Chem. Phys. Lett. 463(1–3), 246–250 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. W. Johnstone et al., Tunable diode laser spectroscopy for industrial process applications: system characterization in conventional and new approaches. IEEE Sens. J. 8(7), 1079–1088 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. B. Axelsson, R. Collin, P.-E. Bengtsson, Laser-induced incandescence for soot particle size measurements in premixed flat flames. Appl. Opt. 39(21), 3683–3690 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. C. Schulz et al., Laser-induced incandescence: recent trends and current questions. Appl. Phys. B 83(3), 333–354 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. K.K. Lehmann, G. Berden, R. Engeln, An introduction to cavity ringdown spectroscopy, in Cavity Ringdown Spectroscopy: Techniques and Applications, G. Berden and R. Engeln (eds.), pp. 1–26 (Blackwell, Chichester, 2009)

  31. L.S. Rothman et al., HITEMP, the high-temperature molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 111(15), 2139–2150 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. I.E. Gordon et al., The HITRAN2016 molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 203, 3–69 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. A.C. Eckbreth, Laser Diagnostics for Combustion Temperature and Species, 2nd edn. Combustion Science and Technology. (Gordon and Breach Publishers, Amsterdam, 1996)

  34. L.S. Rothman et al., The HITRAN2012 molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 130, 4–50 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. E. Kaiser et al., Experimental and modeling study of premixed atmospheric-pressure dimethyl ether—air flames. J. Phys. Chem. A 104(35), 8194–8206 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. S.P. Roy, D.C. Haworth, A systematic comparison of detailed soot models and gas-phase chemical mechanisms in laminar premixed flames. Combust. Sci. Technol. 188(7), 1021–1053 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Y. Hu, Radical concentration and temperature measurements in sooting flames by cavity ringdown spectroscopy and laser-induced fluorescence, PhD thesis (University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 2015)

  38. R. El Hachtouki, J. Vander Auwera, Absolute line intensities in acetylene: the 1.5-μm region. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 216(2), 355–362 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. G.S. Humphries et al., In situ photoacoustic measurement of soot profiles in laminar flames using a high-repetition-rate pulsed fibre laser. Appl. Phys. B 125(4), 60 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. C. Betrancourt et al., Investigation of the size of the incandescent incipient soot particles in premixed sooting and nucleation flames of n-butane using LII, HIM, and 1 nm-SMPS. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 51(8), 916–935 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. H. Bladh et al., Probing the smallest soot particles in low-sooting premixed flames using laser-induced incandescence. Proc. Combust. Inst. 35(2), 1843–1850 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Ergut et al., The effect of equivalence ratio on the soot onset chemistry in one-dimensional, atmospheric-pressure, premixed ethylbenzene flames. Combust. Flame 151(1), 173–195 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Platform Grant EP/P001661/1. P.O. was in receipt of a PhD studentship from the University of Strathclyde. G.H. was supported by an EPSRC Doctoral Prize.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Montrose Street, Glasgow, G1 1XJ, Scotland, UK

    P. Otti, G. S. Humphries, Y. Hu & I. S. Burns

  2. Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, George Street, Glasgow, G1 1XW, Scotland, UK

    G. S. Humphries & M. Lengden

Authors
  1. P. Otti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. S. Humphries
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Lengden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I. S. Burns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.O. performed the cw-CRDS experiments, analysed the data and prepared the figures, with support from G.H.; Y.H. performed the flame temperature measurements; I.B. and M.L. supervised the research; P.O. and G.H. drafted the manuscript; I.B. edited the manuscript with additional contributions from M.L.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. S. Burns.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Otti, P., Humphries, G.S., Hu, Y. et al. Measurement of acetylene concentration in laminar flat flames by diode laser cavity ring-down spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. B 128, 165 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-022-07883-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-022-07883-y

Search

Navigation