High-speed camera study of Stage III crack propagation in chemically strengthened glass
- 514 Downloads
Thermally or chemically strengthened glass is more resistant to damage and breakage compared to non-strengthened glass. Both strengthening mechanisms are based on incorporation of a compressive stress profile in the surface of the glass, which must be balanced by an equivalent amount of integrated tensile stress in the interior of the glass. This tensile stress is believed to affect the kinetics of Stage III crack propagation upon fracture of the sample. In this study, we use a high-speed camera to perform direct measurement of the kinetics of Stage III fracture in a strengthened glass sample. Data including crack propagation speed, crack bifurcation distance, and bifurcation angles are collected at a rate of 500,000 frames per second and then characterized. The authors believe that these data will provide a foundation for understanding the physics of Stage III fracture in strengthened glass samples.
KeywordsCrack Velocity Dynamic Stress Intensity Factor Bifurcation Angle Dynamic Crack Propagation Crack Propagation Speed
The authors would like to thank Todd Rumbaugh of Hadland Imaging and Jason O’Connell of Tech Imaging Services for assistance with the high-speed camera.
Supplementary material 1 (MPG 1162 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (MPG 1155 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (MPG 1162 kb)
- 5.P. Acloque, J. Tochon, “Measurement of Mechanical Resistance of Glass after Reinforcement,” in colloquium on mechanical strength of glass and ways of improving it, 25–29 September 1961, Florence, Italy (Union Scientifique Continentale du Verre, Charlori, Belgium, 1962), pp. 687–704Google Scholar
- 6.ECE regulation R43, Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, Equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions, p. 46Google Scholar
- 10.S.T. Gulati, Trans. Ind. Ceram. Soc. 64, 117 (2005)Google Scholar
- 22.G.D. Quinn, Fractography of ceramics and glasses, NIST, Spec. Publ. 960-17, Washington, 2006Google Scholar
- 23.E. Bouyne, O. Gaume, Fragmentation of thin chemically tempered glass plates. Glass Technol. 43C, 300–302 (2002)Google Scholar
- 24.Z. Tang, M.B. Abrams, J.C. Mauro, N. Venkataraman, T.E. Meyer, J.M. Jacobs, X. Wu, and A.J. Ellison, Automated apparatus for measuring the frangibility and fragmentation of strengthened glass, Exp. Mech. 2013. doi: 10.1007/s11340-014-9855-5
- 28.F. Kerkhoff, in Dynamic crack propagation, ed. by G.C. Sih, (Noordhoff International Publishing, Leyden, 1973), pp. 3–35Google Scholar
- 29.M. Ramulu, A.S. Kobayashi, Mechanics of crack curving and branching––a dynamic fracture analysis, dynamic fracture, 1985, pp. 61–75Google Scholar