Skip to main content
Log in

Effects and efficiency of consolidation treatments on Palaeolithic reindeer antler. Multi-analytical study by means of XRD, FT-IR microspectroscopy, SEM, TEM and μ-PIXE/PIGE analyses

  • Published:
Applied Physics A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bone materials record information on palaeodiets and palaeoenvironment, contained in their chemical and isotopic composition. Therefore, it is very important, while preserving these objects, to keep an open access to this information. In the present paper, we characterise the effects of consolidation treatments on the structure and chemical composition of archaeological reindeer antler at different hierarchical scales. X-ray diffraction, infra-red spectroscopy and microscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy coupled with an X-ray analysing system and proton-induced X-ray and γ-ray emission were used to reveal the state of preservation of reindeer antler and to evaluate the effectiveness of their consolidation treatments. These treatments are shown not to affect the chemical composition, but the crystallinity of the solid phase, as far as Palaeolithic material is concerned. In terms of penetration, the most efficient treatment, among those tested, seems to be the Rhodopas 15% single-bath treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Reiche, L. Favre-Quattropani, T. Calligaro, J. Salomon, H. Bocherens, L. Charlet, M. Menu, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 150, 656 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. C.I. Smith, C.M. Nielsen-Marsh, M.M.E. Jans, M.J. Collins, J. Archaeol. Sci. 34, 9 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Bocherens, C. Polet, M. Toussaint, J. Archaeol. Sci. 34, 10 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Rossi, S. De Gruchy, N.C. Lovell, Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 14, 104 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.L. Down, M.A. MacDonald, J. Tetreault, R.S. Williams, Stud. Conserv. 41, 19 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J.S. Johnson, J. Field Archaeol. 21, 221 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. L.A. Kres, N.C. Lovell, J. Field Archaeol. 22, 508 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.T. Stone, D.N. Dickel, G.H. Doran, J. Field Archaeol. 17, 177 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. I.K.L. Vestergaard, C.V. Horie, in ICOM Committee for Conservation, vol. 2 (1996), p. 938

  10. O. Chiantore, M. Lazzari, Polymer 42, 17 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G.J. Nicholson, J. Tomluk, A. Czarnetzkl, L. Bachmann, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 118, 117 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.H. Crigel, M. Balligand, E. Heinen, Ann. Méd. Vét. 145, 25 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Weiner, O. Bar-Yosef, J. Archaeol. Sci. 17, 187 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L.E. Wright, H.P. Schwarcz, J. Archaeol. Sci. 23, 933 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Person, H. Bocherens, J.F. Saliege, F. Paris, V. Zeitoun, M. Gerard, J. Archaeol. Sci. 22, 211 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Calligaro, J.C. Dran, J. Salomon, P. Walter, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 226, 29 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J.A. Maxwell, J.L. Campbell, W.J. Teesdale, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 43, 218 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Chadefaux, C. Vignaud, M. Menu, I. Reiche, Archaeometry (2008), DOI: 10.1111/j.1475.4754.2008.00373x

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Chadefaux.

Additional information

PACS

61.05.Cp; 81.07.Bc; 81.05.Qk; 87.64.Ee; 87.64.km

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chadefaux, C., Vignaud, C., Menu, M. et al. Effects and efficiency of consolidation treatments on Palaeolithic reindeer antler. Multi-analytical study by means of XRD, FT-IR microspectroscopy, SEM, TEM and μ-PIXE/PIGE analyses. Appl. Phys. A 92, 171–177 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-008-4469-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-008-4469-3

Keywords

Navigation