Skip to main content
Log in

Potentialities of XRF and EIS portable instruments for the characterisation of ancient artefacts

  • Published:
Applied Physics A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-destructive testing methods are very important tools for conservators and art historians to obtain valuable information about works of art without causing any or even local damage to them. Two successful case studies showing the noticeable potentialities of two analytical portable instruments employed in the characterisation of tangible cultural heritage are shown. The first example concerns the chemical characterisation via an X-ray fluorescence (XRF) portable instrument of the red decorative pigment and of the stone surface of the Capestrano Warrior (Archaeological Museum of Chieti, Italy), which is considered the most important Italic stone statue found in Italy. The second concerns the use of a portable electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement system for the characterisation of the protective effectiveness of the paints on the railing of Palazzo Reale in Torino, Italy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Angelini, G.M. Ingo, F. Rosalbino, T. De Caro, S. Grassini, Metall. Ital. 78, 9 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Moretti, Il Guerriero Italico di Capestrano (, Rome, 1936)

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Mariani, L’Aufidena, in Monumenti Antichi dei Lincei, vol. 10 (, 1901), col. 225

  4. V. Cianfarani, Antiche Civiltà d’Abruzzo (, Rome, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.F. Stary, Zur Eisenzeitlichen Bewaffnung und Kampfweise in Mittel-Italien (, Mainz, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Salvia del Rosario, Necropoli archaiche d’Abruzzo: la necropoli di Capestrano. In Papers in Italian Archaeology IV: part iii, Patterns in Protohistory (B.A.R. Int. Ser. 245) (Cambridge, 1985)

  7. G. Paternoster, R. Rinzivillo, F. Nunziata, E.M. Castellucci, C. Lofrumento, J. Cult. Herit. 6, 21 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Longoni, C. Fiorini, P. Leutenneger, G. Fronterotta, L. Struder, P. Lechner, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 409, 407 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A.G. Karydas, D. Kotzamani, R. Bernard, J.N. Barrandon, C. Zarkadas, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 226, 15 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Cultrone, G. Barone, G. Cangemi, S. Ioppolo, J. Cult. Herit. 2, 199 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. W.J. Lorenz, F. Mansfeld, in Fundamental Aspects of Corrosion Protection by Surface Modification, ed. by E. McCafferty, C.R. Clayton, J. Oudar (Proc. Ser. PV 84-3) (The Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ, 1984), p. 144

  12. C. Price, D. Hallam, G. Heath, D. Creagh, J. Ashton, An electrochemical study of waxes for bronze sculpture. In Metal95 – International Conference on Metal Conservation, Semur en Auxois, France, 25–28 September 1995, ed. by I.D. MacLeod, S.L. Pennec, L. Robbiola (James & James, , 1997), pp. 233–241

  13. L.A. Ellingson, T. Shedlosky, G.P. Bierwagen, E.R. de la Rie, L.B. Brostoff, Stud. Conserv. 49, 53 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. L.B. Brostoff, E.R. de la Rie, Research into protective coating system for outdoor bronze sculpture and ornamentation. In Metal95 – International Conference on Metal Conservation, Semur en Auxois, France, 25–28 September 1995, ed. by I.D. MacLeod, S.L. Pennec, L. Robbiola (James & James, , 1997), pp. 242–244

  15. A. Carullo, F. Ferraris, M. Parvis, E. Vallan, E. Angelini, P. Spinelli, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 49, 371 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Angelini.

Additional information

PACS

68.55.Jk; 68.35.Dv; 68.37.Hk; 68.55.Nq; 81.05.Bx

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Angelini, E., Grassini, S., Corbellini, S. et al. Potentialities of XRF and EIS portable instruments for the characterisation of ancient artefacts. Appl. Phys. A 83, 643–649 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-006-3546-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-006-3546-8

Keywords

Navigation