Advertisement

Coral Reefs

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 1119–1125 | Cite as

Association with a sea anemone alters the skin microbiome of clownfish

  • Zoe A. PratteEmail author
  • Nastassia V. Patin
  • Mary E. McWhirt
  • Alicia M. Caughman
  • Darren J. Parris
  • Frank J. Stewart
Note

Abstract

Host-associated microbes play important roles in animal health. Clownfish and anemones form a mutualistic relationship where external surfaces are in constant contact with one another. The effects of this mutualism on the skin mucosal microbiome of clownfish are unknown. We monitored the mucosal microbiome of the clownfish Amphiprion clarkii before, during and after association (hosting) with the anemone Entacmaea quadricolor. Microbiome composition differed significantly between hosting and non-hosting clownfish. Upon separation of clownfish from anemones, the microbiome of post-hosting fish converged to resemble that of non-hosting fish. Bacterial sequence variants that significantly distinguished hosting from non-hosting clownfish were more abundant in the anemone microbiome and that of hosting fish, compared to non-hosting fish, suggesting transfer from or enrichment by the anemone. These results show that direct contact mutualism results in significant but reversible microbiome shifts, raising questions about a potential microbial role in mediating the fish–anemone interaction.

Keywords

Amphiprion clarkii Entacmaea quadricolor Symbiosis Clownfish Anemone Mutualism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Simons Foundation (award 346253 of FJS) and the Teasley Endowment to the Georgia Institute of Technology. We are grateful to the Physiological Research Laboratory staff at the Georgia Institute of Technology for the dedicated care of the research animals, and to Sustainable Aquatics for supplying animals. Research was conducted under IACUC permit A100024. ZAP, FJS, NVP and DJP developed the experimental design. ZAP, NVP, MEM and AMC performed the experimental procedures. ZAP, NVP and FJS contributed to data analysis, and ZAP and FJS wrote the manuscript with editorial assistance from all authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amir A, McDonald D, Navas-Molina JA, Kopylova E, Morton JT, Zech Xu Z, Kightley EP, Thompson LR, Hyde ER, Gonzalez A, Knight R (2017) Deblur Rapidly Resolves Single-Nucleotide Community Sequence Patterns. mSystems 2:Google Scholar
  2. Ángeles Esteban M (2012) An overview of the immunological defenses in fish skin. ISRN ImmunolGoogle Scholar
  3. Buffie CG, Pamer EG (2013) Microbiota-mediated colonization resistance against intestinal pathogens. Nat Rev Immunol 13:790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantley AM, Clardy J (2015) Animals in a bacterial world: opportunities for chemical ecology. Nat Prod Rep 32:888–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen MY, Parfrey LW (2018) Incubation with macroalgae induces large shifts in water column microbiota, but minor changes to the epibiota of co‐occurring macroalgae. Mol EcolGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiarello M, Auguet J-C, Bettarel Y, Bouvier C, Claverie T, Graham NAJ, Rieuvilleneuve F, Sucré E, Bouvier T, Villéger S (2018) Skin microbiome of coral reef fish is highly variable and driven by host phylogeny and diet. Microbiome 6:147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleveland A, Verde EA, Lee RW (2011) Nutritional exchange in a tropical tripartite symbiosis: direct evidence for the transfer of nutrients from anemonefish to host anemone and zooxanthellae. Mar Biol 158:589–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dobson ADW, Jackson SA, Kennedy J, Margassery LM, Flemer B, O’Leary N, Morrissey JP, O’Gara F (2015) Marine Sponges – Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. In: Kim S-K (ed) Springer Handbook of Marine Biotechnology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 219–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott JK, Mariscal RN, Roux KH (1994) Do anemonefishes use molecular mimicry to avoid being stung by host anemones? J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 179:99–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ezenwa VO, Gerardo NM, Inouye DW, Medina M, Xavier JB (2012) Animal Behavior and the Microbiome. Science (80-) 338:198 LP-199Google Scholar
  11. Fautin DG (1991) The anemonefish symbiosis: what is known and what is not. Symbiosis 10:23–46Google Scholar
  12. Gilbert JA, Quinn RA, Debelius J, Xu ZZ, Morton J, Garg N, Jansson JK, Dorrestein PC, Knight R (2016) Microbiome-wide association studies link dynamic microbial consortia to disease. Nature 535:94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Godwin J, Fautin DG (1992) Defense of Host Actinians by Anemonefishes. Copeia 1992:902–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kau AL, Ahern PP, Griffin NW, Goodman AL, Gordon JI (2011) Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature 474:327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lubbock R (1980) Why are clownfishes not stung by sea anemones? Proc R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci 207:35 LP-61Google Scholar
  16. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mebs D (2009) Chemical biology of the mutualistic relationships of sea anemones with fish and crustaceans. Toxicon 54:1071–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Porat D, Chadwick-Furman NE (2004) Effects of anemonefish on giant sea anemones: expansion behavior, growth, and survival. 513–520Google Scholar
  19. Porat D, Chadwick-Furman NE (2005) Effects of anemonefish on giant sea anemones: ammonium uptake, zooxanthella content and tissue regeneration. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 38:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pratte ZA, Richardson LL, Mills DK (2015) Microbiota shifts in the surface mucopolysaccharide layer of corals transferred from natural to aquaria settings. J Invertebr Pathol 125:42–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pratte ZA, Longo GO, Burns AS, Hay ME, Stewart FJ (2017) Contact with turf algae alters the coral microbiome: contact versus systemic impacts. Coral ReefsGoogle Scholar
  22. Pratte ZA, Besson M, Hollman RD, Stewart FJ (2018) The gills ofreef fish support a distinct microbiome influenced by host-specific factors. Appl Environ Microb.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00063-18 Google Scholar
  23. Schmidt V, Gomez-Chiarri M, Roy C, Smith K, Amaral-Zettler L (2017) Subtle Microbiome Manipulation Using Probiotics Reduces Antibiotic-Associated Mortality in Fish. mSystems 2:Google Scholar
  24. Theis KR, Venkataraman A, Dycus JA, Koonter KD, Schmitt-Matzen EN, Wagner AP, Holekamp KE, Schmidt TM (2013) Symbiotic bacteria appear to mediate hyena social odors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:19832 LP-19837Google Scholar
  25. Verde EA, Cleveland A, Lee RW (2015) Nutritional exchange in a tropical tripartite symbiosis II: direct evidence for the transfer of nutrients from host anemone and zooxanthellae to anemonefish. Mar Biol 162:0Google Scholar
  26. Verhulst NO, Takken W, Dicke M, Schraa G, Smallegange RC (2010) Chemical ecology of interactions between human skin microbiota and mosquitoes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations