Coral Reefs

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 1047–1057 | Cite as

Regional restoration benchmarks for Acropora cervicornis

  • Stephanie A. Schopmeyer
  • Diego Lirman
  • Erich Bartels
  • David S. Gilliam
  • Elizabeth A. Goergen
  • Sean P. Griffin
  • Meaghan E. Johnson
  • Caitlin Lustic
  • Kerry Maxwell
  • Cory S. Walter
Report

Abstract

Coral gardening plays an important role in the recovery of depleted populations of threatened Acropora cervicornis in the Caribbean. Over the past decade, high survival coupled with fast growth of in situ nursery corals have allowed practitioners to create healthy and genotypically diverse nursery stocks. Currently, thousands of corals are propagated and outplanted onto degraded reefs on a yearly basis, representing a substantial increase in the abundance, biomass, and overall footprint of A. cervicornis. Here, we combined an extensive dataset collected by restoration practitioners to document early (1–2 yr) restoration success metrics in Florida and Puerto Rico, USA. By reporting region-specific data on the impacts of fragment collection on donor colonies, survivorship and productivity of nursery corals, and survivorship and productivity of outplanted corals during normal conditions, we provide the basis for a stop-light indicator framework for new or existing restoration programs to evaluate their performance. We show that current restoration methods are very effective, that no excess damage is caused to donor colonies, and that once outplanted, corals behave just as wild colonies. We also provide science-based benchmarks that can be used by programs to evaluate successes and challenges of their efforts, and to make modifications where needed. We propose that up to 10% of the biomass can be collected from healthy, large A. cervicornis donor colonies for nursery propagation. We also propose the following benchmarks for the first year of activities for A. cervicornis restoration: (1) >75% live tissue cover on donor colonies; (2) >80% survivorship of nursery corals; and (3) >70% survivorship of outplanted corals. Finally, we report productivity means of 4.4 cm yr−1 for nursery corals and 4.8 cm yr−1 for outplants as a frame of reference for ranking performance within programs. Such benchmarks, and potential subsequent adaptive actions, are needed to fully assess the long-term success of coral restoration and species recovery programs.

Keywords

Acropora cervicornis Restoration Species recovery Survival Productivity Growth 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the many divers who assisted with nursery maintenance, coral outplanting, and data collection for this manuscript, especially: MIA: C. Drury, R. Santos, B. Huntington, R. Gomez, R. Christian, B. Teare, C. Hill, D. Vita, J. Cole, M. Coogan, L. Harmen, M. McKinney; BC: B. Bliss, A. Brownlee, S. Bush, K. Correia, K, Cucinotta, N. D’Antonio, P. Espitia, D. Fahy, A. Halperin, L. Kabay, M. Lopez Padierna, Z. Ostroff, J. Stein, C. Walton; MK: W. Sharp, J. Hunt, J. Snook, J. Hornbeck, W. Crowder, N. Corby, K. Erickson, B. Reckenbeil, E. Hart; LK: S. Hammett, K. Correia; TNC: J. Bailey, T. Ziegler; and PR: T. Moore, M. Nemeth, H. Ruiz, P. Rodriguez. We also appreciate the insight and advice of C. Drury and S. Miller. Research activities were funded by The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Award #NA09NFF4630332).

Supplementary material

338_2017_1596_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)
338_2017_1596_MOESM2_ESM.eps (2.4 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (EPS 2440 kb)
338_2017_1596_MOESM3_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Alvarez-Filip L, Dulvy NK, Gill JA, Côté IM, Watkinson AR (2009) Flattening of Caribbean coral reefs: region-wide declines in architectural complexity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:3019–3025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bak RP, Criens S (1982) Experimental fusion in Atlantic Acropora (Scleractinia). Mar Biol Lett 3:67–72Google Scholar
  3. Baums IB (2008) A restoration genetics guide for coral reef conservation. Mol Ecol 17:2796–2811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baums I, Devlin-Durante M, Brown L, Pinzón J (2009) Nine novel, polymorphic microsatellite markers for the study of threatened Caribbean acroporid corals. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1155–1158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker LC, Mueller E (2001) The culture, transplantation and storage of Montastraea faveolata, Acropora cervicornis and Acropora palmata: what we have learned so far. Bull Mar Sci 69:881–896Google Scholar
  6. Bowden-Kerby A (2001) Low-tech coral reef restoration methods modeled after natural fragmentation processes. Bull Mar Sci 69:915–931Google Scholar
  7. Bruckner AW (2002) Potential application of the U.S. Endangered species act as a conservation strategy. In: Proceedings of the Caribbean Acropora workshop 18–22 April 2002, Miami, FL. NOAA technical memorandum NMFS-OPR-24. National oceanographic and atmospheric administration, Silver Spring, MD, pp 199Google Scholar
  8. Bruckner A, Bruckner R (2001) Condition of restored Acropora palmata fragments off Mona Island, Puerto Rico, 2 years after the Fortuna Reefer ship grounding. Coral Reefs 20:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chamberland V, Petersen D, Latijnhouwers K, Snowden S, Mueller B, Vermeij M (2016) Four-year-old Caribbean Acropora colonies reared from field-collected gametes are sexually mature. Bull Mar Sci 92:263–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drury C, Manzello D, Lirman D (2017) Genotype and local environment dynamically influence growth, disturbance response and survivorship in the threatened coral, Acropora cervicornis. PLoS One 12:e0174000CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards AJ, Gomez ED (2007) Reef restoration concepts and guidelines: making sensible management choices in the face of uncertainty. Coral Reef Targeted Research and Capacity Building for Management Programme, St Lucia, p 38Google Scholar
  12. Edmunds PJ (2007) Evidence for a decadal-scale decline in the growth rates of juvenile scleractinian corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 341:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Epstein N, Bak RPM, Rinkevich B (2001) Strategies for gardening denuded coral reef areas: the applicability of using different types of coral material for reef restoration. Restor Ecol 9:432–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Epstein N, Bak RPM, Rinkevich B (2003) Applying forest restoration principles to coral reef rehabilitation. Aquat Conserv 13:387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fogarty ND (2012) Caribbean acroporid coral hybrids are viable across life history stages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 446:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gladfelter EH, Monahan RK, Gladfelter WB (1978) Growth rates of five reef-building corals in the northeastern Caribbean. Bull Mar Sci 28:728–734Google Scholar
  17. Griffin JN, Schrack EC, Lewis KA, Baums IB, Soomdat N, Silliman BR (2015) Density-dependent effects on initial growth of a branching coral under restoration. Restor Ecol 23:197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffin S, Spathias H, Moore T, Baums I, Griffin B (2012) Scaling up Acropora nurseries in the Caribbean and improving techniques. Proceedings of the 12th international Coral Reef symposium. www.icrs2012.com/proceedings/manuscripts/ICRS2012_20A_2.pdf
  19. Highsmith RC (1982) Reproduction by fragmentation in corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7:207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huntington BE, Miller MW (2013) Location-specific metrics for rapidly estimating the abundance and condition of the threatened coral Acropora cervicornis. Restor Ecol 22:299–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaap WC, Halas JC, Muller RG (1988) Community dynamics of stony corals (Milleporina and Scleractinia) at Key Largo National Marine Sanctuary, Florida, during 1981–1986. In: Proceedings of the 6th int coral reef symposium vol 2, pp 237–243Google Scholar
  22. Johnson ME, Lustic C, Bartels E, Baums IB, Gilliam DS, Larson EA, Lirman D, Miller MW, Nedimyer K, Schopmeyer S (2011) Caribbean Acropora restoration guide: best practices for propagation and population enhancement. The Nature Conservancy, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Kiel C, Huntington B, Miller M (2012) Tractable field metrics for restoration and recovery monitoring of staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis. Endanger Species Res 19:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kramer PR, McField M, Alvarez-Filip L, Drysdale I, Flores MR, Giro A, Pott R (2015) 2015 report card for the Mesoamerican Reef. Healthy Reef Initiative. www.healthyreefs.org
  25. Lirman D, Miller MW (2003) Modeling and monitoring tools to assess recovery status and convergence rates between restored and undisturbed coral reef habitats. Restor Ecol 11:448–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lirman D, Schopmeyer S (2016) Ecological solutions to reef degradation: optimizing coral reef restoration in the Caribbean and Western Atlantic. PeerJ 4:e2597CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Lirman D, Schopmeyer S, Galvan V, Drury C, Baker AC, Baums IB (2014a) Growth dynamics of the threatened Caribbean staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis: influence of host genotype, symbiont identity, colony size, and environmental setting. PLoS One 9:e107253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Lirman D, Formel N, Schopmeyer S, Ault J, Smith S, Gilliam D, Riegl B (2014b) Percent recent mortality (PRM) of stony corals as an ecological indicator of coral reef condition. Ecol Indic 44:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lirman D, Thyberg T, Herlan J, Hill C, Young-Lahiff C, Schopmeyer S, Huntington B, Santos R, Drury C (2010) Propagation of the threatened staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis: methods to minimize the impacts of fragment collection and maximize production. Coral Reefs 29:729–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lohr KE, Bejarano S, Lirman D, Schopmeyer S, Manfrino C (2015) Optimizing the productivity of a coral nursery focused on staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis. Endanger Species Res 27:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Madden CJ, Rudnick DT, McDonald AA, Cunniff KM, Fourqurean JW (2009) Ecological indicators for assessing and communicating seagrass status and trends in Florida Bay. Ecol Indic 9:S68–S82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (2006) Endangered and threatened species: final listing determinations for Elkhorn coral and Staghorn coral. Fed Regist 71:26852–26861Google Scholar
  33. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (2014) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: final listing determinations on proposal to list 66 reef-building coral species and to reclassify elkhorn and staghorn corals. Fed Regist 79:53852–54123Google Scholar
  34. Nedimyer K, Gaines K, Roach S (2011) Coral tree nursery: an innovative approach to growing corals in an ocean-based field nursery. AACL Bioflux 4:442–446Google Scholar
  35. O’Donnell KE, Lohr KE, Bartels E, Patterson JT (2017) Evaluation of staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis, Lamarck 1816) production techniques in an ocean-based nursery with consideration of coral genotype. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 487:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Porter JW, Meier OW (1992) Quantification of loss and change in Floridian reef coral populations. Am Zool 32:625–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Precht WF (2006) Coral reef restoration handbook. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rinkevich B (1995) Restoration strategies for coral reefs damaged by recreational activities: the use of sexual and asexual recruits. Restor Ecol 3:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rinkevich B (2005) Conservation of coral reefs through active restoration measures: recent approaches and last decade progress. Environ Sci Technol 39:4333–4342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rinkevich B (2014) Rebuilding coral reefs: does active reef restoration lead to sustainable reefs? Curr Opin Environ Sustain 7:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schopmeyer SA, Lirman D (2015) Occupation dynamics and impacts of damselfish territoriality on recovering populations of the threatened staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis. PLoS One 10:e0141302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Shafir S, Rinkevich B (2008) The underwater silviculture approach for reef restoration: an emergent aquaculture theme. In: Schwartz SH (ed) Aquaculture research trends. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 279–295Google Scholar
  43. Shafir S, Van Rijn J, Rinkevich B (2006) Steps in the construction of underwater coral nursery, an essential component in reef restoration acts. Mar Biol 149:679–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shaish L, Levy G, Gomez E, Rinkevich B (2008) Fixed and suspended coral nurseries in the Philippines: establishing the first step in the “gardening concept” of reef restoration. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 358:86–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shinn EA (1966) Coral growth rate, an environmental indicator. J Paleontol 40:233–240Google Scholar
  46. Soong K, Chen T (2003) Coral transplantation: regeneration and growth of Acropora fragments in a nursery. Restor Ecol 11:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tunnicliffe V (1981) Breakage and propagation of the stony coral Acropora cervicornis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:2427–2431CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Tunnicliffe V (1983) Caribbean staghorn coral populations: pre-hurricane Allen conditions in Discovery Bay, Jamaica. Bull Mar Sci 33:132–151Google Scholar
  49. Vargas-Ángel B, Thomas JD, Hoke SM (2003) High-latitude Acropora cervicornis thickets off Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA. Coral Reefs 22:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker BK, Larson E, Moulding AL, Gilliam DS (2012) Small-scale mapping of indeterminate arborescent acroporid coral (Acropora cervicornis) patches. Coral Reefs 31:885–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wirt KE, Hallock P, Palandro D, Daly KL (2013) Potential habitat of Acropora spp. on Florida reefs. Appl Geogr 39:118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wirt KE, Hallock P, Palandro D, Lunz KS (2015) Potential habitat of Acropora spp. on reefs of Florida, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands. Glob Ecol Conserv 3:242–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Young C, Schopmeyer S, Lirman D (2012) A review of reef restoration and coral propagation using the threatened genus Acropora in the Caribbean and Western Atlantic. Bull Mar Sci 88:1075–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie A. Schopmeyer
    • 1
  • Diego Lirman
    • 1
  • Erich Bartels
    • 2
  • David S. Gilliam
    • 3
  • Elizabeth A. Goergen
    • 3
  • Sean P. Griffin
    • 4
  • Meaghan E. Johnson
    • 5
  • Caitlin Lustic
    • 5
  • Kerry Maxwell
    • 6
  • Cory S. Walter
    • 2
  1. 1.Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric ScienceUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Tropical Research LaboratoryMote Marine LaboratorySummerland KeyUSA
  3. 3.Halmos College of Natural Sciences and OceanographyNova Southeastern UniversityDania BeachUSA
  4. 4.I.M. Systems GroupNOAA Restoration CenterAguadillaUSA
  5. 5.The Nature ConservancyBig Pine KeyUSA
  6. 6.Florida Marine Research InstituteFish and Wildlife Conservation CommissionMarathonUSA

Personalised recommendations