Skip to main content

Plasticity in skeletal characteristics of nursery-raised staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis

Abstract

Staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis, is a threatened species and the primary focus of western Atlantic reef restoration efforts to date. We compared linear extension, calcification rate, and skeletal density of nursery-raised A. cervicornis branches reared for 6 months either on blocks attached to substratum or hanging from PVC trees in the water column. We demonstrate that branches grown on the substratum had significantly higher skeletal density, measured using computerized tomography, and lower linear extension rates compared to water-column fragments. Calcification rates determined with buoyant weighing were not statistically different between the two grow-out methods, but did vary among coral genotypes. Whereas skeletal density and extension rates were plastic traits that depended on grow-out method, calcification rate was conserved. Our results show that the two rearing methods generate the same amount of calcium carbonate skeleton but produce colonies with different skeletal characteristics and suggest that there is genetically based variability in coral calcification performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Alevizon WS, Porter JW (2015) Coral loss and fish guild stability on a Caribbean coral reef: 1974–2000. Environ Biol Fish 98:1035–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson RB, Precht WF (2001) White-band disease and the changing face of Caribbean coral reefs. Hydrobiologia 460:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baums IB (2008) A restoration genetics guide for coral reef conservation. Mol Ecol 17:2796–2811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baums IB, Hughes CR, Hellberg ME (2005) Mendelian microsatellite loci for the Caribbean coral Acropora palmata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 288:115–127

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baums IB, Johnson ME, Devlin-Durante MK, Miller MW (2010) Host population genetic structure and zooxanthellae diversity of two reef-building coral species along the Florida Reef Tract and wider Caribbean. Coral Reefs 29:835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buddemeier RW, Kinzie RA III (1976) Coral growth. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 14:183–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AL, McConnaughey TA (2003) Geochemical perspectives on coral mineralization. In: Dove PM, De Yoreo JJ, Weiner S (eds) Biomineralization. Reviews in mineralogy and geochemistry. Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, VA, pp 151–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury C, Dale KE, Panlilio JM, Miller SV, Lirman D, Larson EA, Bartels E, Crawford DL, Oleksiak MF (2016) Genomic variation among populations of threatened coral: Acropora cervicornis. BMC Genomics 17:286

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Enochs IC, Manzello DP, Carlton R, Schopmeyer S, van Hooidonk R, Lirman D (2014) Effects of light and elevated pCO2 on the growth and photochemical efficiency of Acropora cervicornis. Coral Reefs 33:477–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster AB (1979) Phenotypic plasticity in the reef corals Montastraea annularis (Ellis & Solander) and Siderastrea siderea (Ellis & Solander). J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 39:25–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goreau TF (1959) The ecology of Jamaican coral reefs I. Species composition and zonation. Ecology 40:67–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard D (2013) Holocene accretion rates and styles for Caribbean coral reefs: Lessons for the past and future. In: Verwer K, Playton TE, Harris PM (eds) Deposits, architecture, and controls of carbonate margin, slope, and basinal settings., SEPM Special Publication No 105Society for Sedimentary Geology, Tulsa, pp 264–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson ME, Lustic C, Bartels E et al (2011) Caribbean Acropora restoration guide: best practices for propagation and population enhancement. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, p 54

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokiel PL, Maragos JE, Franzisket L (1978) Coral growth: buoyant weight technique. In: Stoddart DR, Johannes RE (eds) Coral reefs: research methods. UNESCO, Paris, pp 529–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokiel PL, Jury CP, Kuffner IB (2016) Coral calcification and ocean acidification. In: Hubbard DK, Rogers CS, Lipps JH, Stanley GD Jr (eds) Coral reefs at the crossroads., Coral reefs of the world 6Springer, Netherlands, pp 7–45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuffner IB, Hickey TD, Morrison JM (2013) Calcification rates of the massive coral Siderastrea siderea and crustose coralline algae along the Florida Keys (USA) outer-reef tract. Coral Reefs 32:987–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lirman D, Schopmeyer S (2016) Ecological solutions to reef degradation: optimizing coral reef restoration in the Caribbean and Western Atlantic. PeerJ 4:e2597

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lirman D, Schopmeyer S, Galvan V, Drury C, Baker AC, Baums IB (2014) Growth dynamics of the threatened caribbean staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis: influence of host genotype, symbiont identity, colony size, and environmental setting. PLoS One 9:e107253

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr KE, Patterson JT (2017) Intraspecific variation in phenotype among nursery-reared staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis (Lamarck, 1816). J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 486:87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre IG, Burke RB, Stuckenrath R (1977) Thickest recorded Holocene reef section, Isla Pérez core hole, Alacran Reef, Mexico. Geology 5:749–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller MW, Kerr K, Williams DE (2016) Reef-scale trends in Florida Acropora spp. abundance and the effects of population enhancement. PeerJ 4:e2523

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison JM, Kuffner IB, Hickey TD (2013) Methods for monitoring corals and crustose coralline algae to quantify in situ calcification rates. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1159, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA

  • NMFS N (2006) Endangered and threatened species: final listing determinations for elkhorn coral and staghorn coral. Federal Register 71:26852–26861

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell KE, Lohr KE, Bartels E, Patterson JT (2017) Evaluation of staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis, Lamarck 1816) production techniques in an ocean-based nursery with consideration of coral genotype. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 487:53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Precht WF, Robbart ML, Aronson RB (2004) The potential listing of Acropora species under the US Endangered Species Act. Mar Pollut Bull 49:534–536

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shinn EA (1966) Coral growth rate, an environmental indicator. J Paleontol 40:233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LW, Barshis D, Birkeland C (2007) Phenotypic plasticity for skeletal growth, density and calcification of Porites lobata in response to habitat type. Coral Reefs 26:559–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis BL, Ayre DJ (1985) Asexual reproduction and genetic determination of growth form in the coral Pavona cactus: biochemical genetic and immunogenic evidence. Oecologia 65:516–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the US Geological Survey (USGS) Coastal and Marine Geology Program. We thank the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary for permits to work with Acropora cervicornis (USGS permit under Kuffner: FKNMS-2013-024-A2 and Mote Marine Laboratory working under authorization of The Nature Conservancy permit: FKNMS-2011-150-A2). We thank J. Morrison, C. Walter, B. Reynolds, and L. Bartlett for help in the field and laboratory. We appreciate NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program and Ocean Acidification Program help in funding the CT scanning equipment. We also thank I. Baums for identifying the genotypes of the nursery corals. All data in support of conclusions drawn in this manuscript are published and freely available for download in USGS data release at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7HH6H72. Any use of trade names herein was for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilsa B. Kuffner.

Additional information

Communicated by Biology Editor Dr. Mark Vermeij

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuffner, I.B., Bartels, E., Stathakopoulos, A. et al. Plasticity in skeletal characteristics of nursery-raised staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis . Coral Reefs 36, 679–684 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-017-1560-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-017-1560-2

Keywords

  • Coral growth
  • Buoyant weight
  • Coral restoration
  • Calcification
  • Genotype effects
  • Coral nurseries