Coral Reefs

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 211–222 | Cite as

“Choice” and destiny: the substrate composition and mechanical stability of settlement structures can mediate coral recruit fate in post-bleached reefs

  • Shreya Yadav
  • Pooja Rathod
  • Teresa Alcoverro
  • Rohan Arthur
Report

Abstract

Increasingly frequent and intense ocean warming events seriously test the buffer and recovery capacities of tropical coral reefs. Post-disturbance, available settlement structures on a reef (often dead coral skeletons) vary considerably in their mechanical stability and substrate composition, critically influencing coral recruit settlement choice and fate. In the wake of a coral mass mortality in the Lakshadweep archipelago, we examine (1) the relative availability of recruit settlement structures (from stable to unstable: reef platform, dead massive coral, consolidated rubble, dead corymbose coral, dead tabular coral, and unconsolidated rubble) in 12 recovering reefs across three atolls in the archipelago, (2) the substrate composition [crustose coralline algae (CCA), mixed turf, macroalgae] of these structural forms, and (3) whether the choice and fate of young coral are mediated by the substrate and stability of different structural forms. For this, we measured the abundance and distribution of recruit (<1 cm), juvenile (1–5 cm), and young adult (5–10) corals of 24 common coral genera. Four years after the mass mortality, reefs differed considerably in composition of settlement structures. The structures themselves varied significantly in substrate cover with dead tables largely covered in CCA [60 ± 6.05 % (SE)] and dead corymbose coral dominated by mixed turf (61.83 ± 3.8 %). The youngest visible recruits (<1 cm) clearly preferred CCA-rich structures such as dead massives and tables. However, older size classes were rarely found on unstable structures (strongly “avoiding” tables, Ivlev’s electivity index, E = −0.5). Our results indicate that while substrate cover might mediate coral choice, the mechanical stability of settlement structures is critical in determining post-settlement coral survival. The composition and availability of settlement structures on a reef may serve as a characteristic signature of its recovery potential, aiding in assessments of reef resilience.

Keywords

Reef recovery Post-settlement survival Substrate cues Structural stability 

References

  1. Alvarez-Filip L, Dulvy NK, Gill JA, Côté IM, Watkinson AR (2009) Flattening of Caribbean coral reefs: region-wide declines in architectural complexity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:3019–3025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold SN, Steneck RS, Mumby PJ (2010) Running the gauntlet: inhibitory effects of algal turfs on the processes of coral recruitment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 414:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur R, Done TJ, Marsh H (2005) Benthic recovery four years after an El-Ninõ-induced coral mass mortality in the Lakshadweep atolls. Curr Sci (Bangalore) 89:694–699Google Scholar
  4. Arthur R, Done TJ, Marsh H, Harriott V (2006) Local processes strongly influence post-bleaching benthic recovery in the Lakshadweep Atolls. Coral Reefs 25:427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belliveau SA, Paul VJ (2002) Effects of herbivory and nutrients on the early colonization of crustose coralline and fleshy algae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 232:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolker B, Skaug H, Magnusson A and Nielsen A (2012) Generalized linear mixed models using AD model builder. R package version 0.6.5. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth edition. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonaldo RM, Bellwood DR (2011) Parrotfish predation on massive Porites on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 30:259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Box SJ, Mumby PJ (2007) Effect of macroalgal competition on growth and survival of juvenile Caribbean corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 342:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brandl SJ, Hoey AS, Bellwood DR (2014) Micro-topography mediates interactions between corals, algae and herbivorous fishes on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 33:421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brawley SH, Adey WH (1977) Territorial behavior of threespot damselfish (Eupomacentrus planifrons) increases reef algal biomass and productivity. Coral Reefs 2:45–51Google Scholar
  11. Cooper W, Lirman D, Schmale M, Lipscomb D (2007) Consumption of coral spat by histophagic ciliates. Coral Reefs 26:249–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darling ES, Alvarez-Filip L, Oliver TA, McClanahan TR, Côté IM (2012) Evaluating the life-history strategies of reef corals from species traits. Ecol Lett 15:1378–1386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixon DL, Abrego D, Hay ME (2014) Chemically mediated behavior of recruiting corals and fishes: a tipping point that may limit reef recovery. Science 345:892–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Done TJ (1992) Phase shifts in coral reef communities and their ecological significance. Hydrobiologia 247:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edmunds PJ, Bruno JF, Carlon DB (2004) Effects of depth and microhabitat on growth and survivorship of juvenile corals in the Florida Keys. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 278:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elmhirst T, Connolly SR, Hughes TP (2009) Connectivity, regime shifts and the resilience of coral reefs. Coral Reefs 28:949–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fong P, Paul VJ (2011) Coral reef algae. In Dubinsky Z, Stambler N (eds) Coral Reefs: an ecosystem in transition. Springer Science Business Media, pp 241–272Google Scholar
  18. Fox HE, Pet JS, Dahuri R, Caldwell RL (2003) Recovery in rubble fields: long-term impacts of blast fishing. Mar Pollut Bull 46:1024–1031CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Frost BW (1977) Feeding behavior of Calanus pacificus in mixtures of food particles. Limnol Oceanogr 22:472–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon TAC, Cowburn B, Sluka RD (2015) Defended territories of an aggressive damselfish contain lower juvenile coral density than adjacent non-defended areas on Kenyan lagoon patch reefs. Coral Reefs 34:13–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrington L, Fabricius K, De’ath G, Negri A (2004) Recognition and selection of settlement substrata determine post-settlement survival in corals. Ecology 85:3428–3437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heyward AJ, Negri AP (1999) Natural inducers for coral larval metamorphosis. Coral Reefs 18:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoey AS, Bellwood DR (2010) Damselfish territories as a refuge for macroalgae on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 29:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hughes TP (1994) Catastrophes, phase shifts, and large-scale degradation of a Caribbean coral reef. Science 265:1547–1551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hughes TP, Baird AH, Dinsdale EA, Moltschaniwskyj NA, Pratchett MS, Tanner JE, Willis BE (2000) Supply-side ecology works both ways: the link between benthic adults, fecundity, and larval recruits. Ecology 81:2241–2249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hughes TP, Rodrigues MJ, Bellwood DR, Ceccarelli D, Hoegh- Guldberg O, McCook LJ, Moltschaniwskyj N, Pratchett MS, Steneck RS, Willis BE (2007) Phase shifts, herbivory, and the resilience of coral reefs to climate change. Curr Biol 17:360–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ivlev VS (1961) Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  28. Jompa J, McCook LJ (2002) Effects of competition and herbivory on interactions between a hard coral and a brown alga. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 271:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karkarey R, Kelkar N, Lobo AS, Alcoverro T, Arthur R (2014) Long-lived groupers require structurally stable reefs in the face of repeated climate change disturbances. Coral Reefs 33:289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kerry JT, Bellwood DR (2015) Do tabular corals constitute keystone structures for fishes on coral reefs? Coral Reefs 35:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuffner IB, Walters LJ, Becerro M, Paul VJ, Ritson-Williams R, Beach K (2006) Inhibition of coral recruitment by macroalgae and cyanobacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 323:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Madin JS, Connolly SR (2006) Ecological consequences of major hydrodynamic disturbances on coral reefs. Nature 444:477–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Madin JS, Baird AH, Domelas M, Connolly SR (2014) Mechanical vulnerability explains size-dependent mortality of reef corals. Ecol Lett 17:1008–1015PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McCook LJ, Jompa J, Diaz-Pulido G (2001) Competition between corals and algae on coral reefs: a review of evidence and mechanisms. Coral Reefs 19:400–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Montgomery WL (1980) The impact of non-selective grazing by the giant blue damselfish, Microspathodon dorsalis, on algal communities in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Bull Mar Sci 47:9–24Google Scholar
  36. Morse DE, Hooker N, Morse ANC, Jensen RA (1988) Control of larval metamorphosis and recruitment in sympatric agariciid corals. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 116:193–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mumby PJ, Steneck R (2008) Coral reef management and conservation in the light of rapidly-evolving ecological paradigms. Trends Ecol Evol 23:555–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Norström AV, Nyström M, Lokrantz J, Folke C (2009) Alternative states on coral reefs: beyond coral–macroalgal phase shifts. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 376:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nozawa Y, Tanaka K, Reimer JD (2010) Reconsideration of the surface structure of settlement plates used in coral recruitment studies. Zool Stud 50:53–60Google Scholar
  40. Penin L, Michonneau F, Baird AH, Connolly SR, Pratchett MS, Kayal M, Adjeroud M (2010) Early post-settlement mortality and the structure of coral assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 408:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Penin L, Adjeroud M (2013) Relative importance of recruitment and post-settlement processes in the maintenance of coral assemblages in an insular, fragmented reef system. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 473:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  43. Raimondi PT, Morse ANC (2000) The consequences of complex larval behavior in a coral. Ecology 81:3193–3211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ritson-Williams R, Arnold SN, Fogarty ND, Steneck RS, Vermeij MJA, Paul VJ (2009) New perspectives on ecological mechanisms affecting coral recruitment on reefs. Smithson Contrib Mar Sci 38:437–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ritson-Williams R, Paul VJ, Arnold SN, Steneck RS (2010) Larval settlement preferences and post-settlement survival of the threatened Caribbean corals Acropora palmata and A. cervicornis. Coral Reefs 29:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roth MS, Knowlton N (2009) Distribution, abundance, and micro- habitat characterization of small juvenile coral at Palmyra Atoll. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 376:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sammarco PW, Williams AH (1982) Damselfish territoriality: influence of Diadema distribution and implications for coral community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 8:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trapon ML, Pratchett MS, Hoey AS (2013a) Spatial variation in abundance, size and orientation of juvenile corals related to the biomass of parrotfishes on the Great Barrier Reef. Australia. PLoS One 8:e57788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Trapon ML, Pratchett MS, Hoey AS, Baird AH (2013b) Influence of fish grazing and sedimentation on the early post-settlement survival of the tabular coral Acropora cytherea. Coral Reefs 32:1051–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Underwood AJ, Fairweather PG (1989) Supply-side ecology and benthic marine assemblages. Trends Ecol Evol 4:16–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Dyke F (2002) Conservation biology: foundations, concepts, applications. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vermeij MJA (2005) Substrate composition and adult distribution determine recruitment patterns in a Caribbean brooding coral. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 295:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vermeij MJA, Fogarty ND, Miller MW (2006) Pelagic conditions affect larval behavior, survival, and settlement patterns in the Caribbean coral Montastrea faveolata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 310:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vermeij MJA, Marhaver KL, Huijbers CM, Nagelkerken I, Simpson SD (2010) Coral larvae move toward reef sounds. PLoS One 5:e1066Google Scholar
  56. Vermeij MJA, Dailer ML, Smith CM (2011) Crustose coralline algae can suppress macroalgal growth and recruitment on Hawaiian coral reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 422:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Willis BL, Oliver JK (1990) Direct tracking of coral larvae: implications for dispersal studies of planktonic larvae in topographically complex habitats. Ophelia 32:145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yau KKW, Wang K, Lee AH (2003) Zero-inflated negative binomial mixed regression modeling of over-dispersed count data with extra zeros. Biom J 45:437–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zuur AF, Ieon EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GA (2009) Zero-truncated and zero-inflated models for count data. In: Zuur AF, Ieon EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GA (eds) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York, pp 261–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shreya Yadav
    • 1
  • Pooja Rathod
    • 2
  • Teresa Alcoverro
    • 3
    • 1
  • Rohan Arthur
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Nature Conservation FoundationMysoreIndia
  2. 2.National Center for Biological SciencesBengaluruIndia
  3. 3.Department of Marine Ecology, Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB)Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)BlanesSpain

Personalised recommendations