Not finding Nemo: limited reef-scale retention in a coral reef fish
- 702 Downloads
The spatial scale of larval dispersal is a key predictor of marine metapopulation dynamics and an important factor in the design of reserve networks. Over the past 15 yr, studies of larval dispersal in coral reef fishes have generated accumulating evidence of consistently high levels of self-recruitment and local retention at various spatial scales. These findings have, to a certain degree, created a paradigm shift toward the perception that large fractions of locally produced recruitment may be the rule rather than the exception. Here we examined the degree of localized settlement in an anemonefish, Amphiprion bicinctus, at a solitary coral reef in the central Red Sea by integrating estimates of self-recruitment obtained from genetic parentage analysis with predictions of local retention derived from a biophysical dispersal model parameterized with real-time physical forcing. Self-recruitment at the reef scale (c. 0.7 km2) was virtually absent during two consecutive January spawning events (1.4 % in 2012 and 0 % in 2013). Predicted levels of local retention at the reef scale varied temporally, but were comparatively low for both simulations (7 % in 2012 and 0 % in 2013). At the same time, the spatial scale of simulated dispersal was restricted to approximately 20 km from the source. Model predictions of reef-scale larval retention were highly dependent on biological parameters, underlining the need for further empirical validations of larval traits over a range of species. Overall, our findings present an urgent caution when assuming the potential for self-replenishment in small marine reserves.
KeywordsLarval dispersal Self-recruitment Local retention Parentage analysis Biophysical model Red Sea
We thank Glenn Almany, Simon Thorrold, Andrea Manica, and two anonymous reviewers for discussions and comments on earlier drafts of the paper; Maha Khalil for the preparation of reef charts and polygon files; and the numerous volunteers who assisted with fieldwork. Financial support was provided in part by KAUST baseline research funds (to MLB) and the Saudi-ARAMCO Marine Environmental Research Center.
- Baguette M, Legrand D, Fréville H, Van Dyck H, Ducatez S (2012) Evolutionary ecology of dispersal in fragmented landscape. In: Clobert J, Baguette M, Benton TG, and Bullock JM (eds) Dispersal ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, pp 381–391Google Scholar
- Bitume EV, Bonte D, Magalhães S, San Martin G, Van Dongen S, Bach F, Anderson JM, Olivieri I, Nieberding CM (2011) Heritability and artificial selection on ambulatory dispersal distance in Tetranychus urticae: effects of density and maternal effects. PLoS One 6:e26927CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonte D, Van Dyck H, Bullock JM, Coulon A, Delgado M, Gibbs M, Lehouck V, Matthysen E, Mustin K, Saastamoinen M, Schtickzelle N, Stevens VM, Vandewoestijne S, Baguette M, Barton K, Benton TG, Chaput-Bardy A, Clobert J, Dytham C, Hovestadt T, Meier CM, Palmer SCF, Turlure C, Travis JMJ (2012) Costs of dispersal. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 87:290–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cowen RK, Lwiza KMM, Sponaugle S, Paris CB, Olson DB (2000) Connectivity of marine populations: open or closed? Science 287:857–859 Cowen RK, Paris C (2003) The role of long distance dispersal versus local retention in replenishing marine populations. Gulf Caribb 14:129–138Google Scholar
- Saenz-Agudelo P, Jones GP, Thorrold SR, Planes S (2011) Connectivity dominates larval replenishment in a coastal reef fish metapopulation. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:2954–2961Google Scholar
- Sponaugle S, Cowen RK, Shanks A, Morgan SG, Leis JM, Pineda J, Boehlert GW, Kingsford MJ, Lindeman KC, Grimes C, Munro JL (2002) Predicting self-recruitment in marine populations: biophysical correlates and mechanisms. Bull Mar Sci 70:341–375Google Scholar
- Swearer SE, Shima JS, Hellberg ME, Thorrold SR, Jones GP, Robertson DR, Morgan SG, Selkoe KA, Ruiz GM, Warner RR (2002) Evidence of self-recruitment in demersal marine populations. Bull Mar Sci 70:251–271Google Scholar
- Warner RR, Cowen RK (2002) Local retention of production in marine populations: evidence, mechanisms, and consequences. Bull Mar Sci 70:245–249Google Scholar