Skip to main content
Log in

Epibiotic mutualists alter coral susceptibility and response to biotic disturbance through cascading trait-mediated indirect interactions

  • Report
  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biotic disturbances are important drivers of community structure, but interactions among community members can determine trajectories of response and recovery. On coral reefs in French Polynesia, epibiotic amphipods induce the formation of branch-like “fingers” on flat colonies of encrusting Montipora coral. The fingers form as coral encrusts the amphipods’ tubes and lead to significant changes in colony morphology. I tested whether the induced morphological changes affect Montipora’s susceptibility to predation by pincushion (Culcita novaeguineae) and crown-of-thorns sea stars (Acanthaster planci). Montipora with fingers were less likely to be attacked and more likely to survive attack than colonies without fingers. Furthermore, the presence of fingers altered A. planci prey preference. Sea stars preferred Montipora without fingers over other common coral genera, but preferred other genera when Montipora had fingers. Amphipods indirectly affected Montipora’s resistance and resilience to predation, and the susceptibility of other coral genera to predation, through induced morphological changes. Such trait-mediated indirect interactions likely play an important role in determining how species respond to periodic sea star outbreaks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Abrams PA (1995) Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities. Am Nat 146:112–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA, Matsuda H (1996) Positive indirect effects between prey species that share predators. Ecology 77:610–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergsma G (2009) Tube-dwelling coral symbionts induce significant morphological change in Montipora. Symbiosis 49:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergsma G, Martinez C (2011) Mutualist-induced morphological changes enhance growth and survival of corals. Mar Biol. doi: 10.1007/s00227-011-1731-6

  • Berumen ML, Pratchett MS (2006) Recovery without resilience: persistent disturbance and long-term shifts in the structure of fish and coral communities at Tiahura Reef, Moorea. Coral Reefs 25:647–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Pennings SC, Richards CL (2003) Phenotypic plasticity and interactions among plants. Ecology 84:1115–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson J (1978) Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 59:211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colgan MW (1987) Coral reef recovery on Guam (Micronesia) after catastrophic predation by Acanthaster planci. Ecology 68:1592–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De’ath G, Moran PJ (1998) Factors affecting the behaviour of crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster planci L.) on the Great Barrier Reef: 2: feeding preferences. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 220:107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devantier LM, Endean R (1988) The scallop Pedum spondyloideum mitigates the effects of Acanthaster planci predation on the host coral Porites: host defense facilitated by exaptation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 47:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM, Heithaus MR, Walters CJ (2003) Behaviorally mediated indirect interactions in marine communities and their conservation implications. Ecology 84:1151–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure G (1989) Degradation of coral reefs at Moorea Island (French Polynesia) by Acanthaster planci. J Coast Res 5:295–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn PW (1987) Some ecological consequences of coral-crustacean guard mutualisms in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Symbiosis 4:301–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Gochfeld DJ (2004) Predation-induced morphological and behavioral defenses in a hard coral: implications for foraging behavior of coral-feeding butterfly fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 267:145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME (1986) Associational plant defenses and the maintenance of species diversity: turning competitors into accomplices. Am Nat 128:617–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition, and structure of prey communities. Theor Popul Biol 12:197–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kayal M, Lenihan H, Pau C, Penin L, Adjeroud M (2011) Associational refuges among corals mediate impacts of a crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci outbreak. Coral Reefs. doi:10.1007/s00338-011-0763-1

  • Keesing JK (1990) Feeding biology of the crown-of-thorns starfish, Acanthaster planci, (Linnaeus). James Cook University of North Queensland, Townsville, p 197

    Google Scholar 

  • Keesing JK (1992) Influence of persistent sub-infestation density Acanthaster planci (L.) and high density Echinometra mathaei (de Blainville) populations on coral reef community structure in Okinawa, Japan. Proceedings of the 7th international Coral Reef Symposium vol 2, pp 769–779

  • Levenbach S (2008) Community-wide ramifications of an associational refuge on shallow rocky reefs. Ecology 89:2819–2828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Stress and Behavior 27:215–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madin EMP, Gaines SD, Warner RR (2010) Field evidence for pervasive indirect effects of fishing on prey foraging behavior. Ecology 91:3563–3571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Offenberg J, Macintosh DJ, Nielsen MG (2006) Indirect ant-protection against crab herbivory: damage-induced susceptibility to crab grazing may lead to its reduction on ant-colonized trees. Funct Ecol 20:52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacor SD, Werner EE (2000) Predator effects on an assemblage of consumers through induced changes in consumer foraging behavior. Ecology 81:1998–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter JW (1972) Predation by Acanthaster and its effects on coral species diversity. Am Nat 106:487–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett MS (2001) Influence of coral symbionts on feeding preferences of crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci in the western Pacific. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 214:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett MS (2007) Feeding preferences of Acanthaster planci (Echinodermata : Asteroidea) under controlled conditions of food availability. Pac Sci 61:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2001) Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology 82:523–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD (2003) Trait-mediated effects in rocky intertidal food chains: Predator risk cues alter prey feeding rates. Ecology 84:629–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Peacor SD (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank C. Martinez, J. Gowan, T. Adam, N. Price, and K. Seydel for assistance in the field, W. Rice for advice on statistics, and S. Holbrook, R. Schmitt, G. Hofmann, R. Pelc, H. Sweatman, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (OCE 04-17412) and gifts from the Worster family and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. This work is a contribution of the Moorea Coral Reef Long Term Ecological Research site and the UC Berkeley Richard B. Gump South Pacific Research Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. S. Bergsma.

Additional information

Communicated by Biology Editor Dr. Hugh Sweatman.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 32 kb)

338_2011_861_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Plate S1: (a) Amphipod-induced finger structures extend from an encrusting Montipora colony. Colonies with fingers exhibited morphologies resembling those of branching corals. (b) A colony of Acropora digitifera used in a feeding trial. Pairs of corals were presented to predators on cinder blocks, so that a sea star feeding on one coral in the pair could easily detect the other. The Acanthaster planci pictured is feeding on a Montipora sp. without fingers that had been paired with the A. digitifera. (c) The feeding scar left by a pin-cushion star (Culcita novaguineae) on a Montipora colony during a feeding trial. The C. novaguineae consumed plating coral along the colony’s edge, but stopped when it encountered finger structures (indicated by arrows). (d) Feeding scar left by a crown-of-thorns sea star (Acanthaster planci) on a Montipora sp. colony in the wild. The A. planci (bottom right) fed on encrusting Montipora until it encountered finger structures (top center) and a Porites sp. colony (top left), then retreated (TIFF 11413 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergsma, G.S. Epibiotic mutualists alter coral susceptibility and response to biotic disturbance through cascading trait-mediated indirect interactions. Coral Reefs 31, 461–469 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-011-0861-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-011-0861-0

Keywords

Navigation