Coral Reefs

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 71–81 | Cite as

Larval settlement preferences and post-settlement survival of the threatened Caribbean corals Acropora palmata and A. cervicornis

  • R. Ritson-Williams
  • Valerie J. Paul
  • S. N. Arnold
  • R. S. Steneck


The settlement specificity of two threatened Caribbean corals, Acropora palmata and A. cervicornis, was tested by measuring their rates of larval metamorphosis in response to crustose coralline algae (CCA) and other substrata. In the no-choice experiments, the coral larvae were placed in six treatments: filtered seawater (FSW), a fragment of biofilmed dead skeleton of A. palmata, or a fragment of one of four species of CCA (Hydrolithon boergesenii, Porolithon pachydermum, Paragoniolithon solubile, and Titanoderma prototypum). Within each CCA treatment, there were three different substrata on which to settle and metamorphose: (1) the CCA surface, (2) the rock under the CCA, or (3) the plastic dish. The 5-day-old larvae of both A. palmata and A. cervicornis had similar rates of total metamorphosis (all substrata combined) in every treatment (excluding FSW) even in the absence of CCA. However, there were differences in larval behavior among the CCA species since the larvae settled and metamorphosed on different substrata in the presence of different CCA species. In the no-choice experiments the larvae of both corals had higher rates of metamorphosis on the top surfaces of H. boergesenii and/or T. prototypum than on P. pachydermum. In the choice experiments, the coral larvae were offered two species of CCA in the same dish. When given a choice, both species of coral larvae had more settlement and metamorphosis on the surface of H. boergesenii or T. prototypum or clean rock than onto the surface of P. solubile. After 6 weeks in the field, transplanted A. palmata recruits had approximately 15% survival on both T. prototypum and H. boergesenii, but A. cervicornis recruits only survived on T. prototypum (13%). Some, but not all, CCA species facilitated the larval settlement and post-settlement survival of these two threatened corals, highlighting the importance of benthic community composition for successful coral recruitment.


Larval ecology Settlement Metamorphosis Post-settlement survival Coralline algae Coral reefs Threatened species 


  1. Adey WH, Macintyre IG (1973) Crustose coralline algae: a re-evaluation in the geological sciences. Geol Soc Am Bull 84:883–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adey WH, Vassar MJ (1975) Colonization, succession and growth rates of tropical crustose coralline algae (Rhodophyta, Cryptonemiales). Phycologia 14:55–69Google Scholar
  3. Adey WH, Townsend RA, Boykins WT (1982) The crustose coralline algae (Rhodophyta: Corallinaceae) of the Hawaiian islands. Smithson Contrib Mar Sci 15:1–74Google Scholar
  4. Aronson R, Precht W (2001) White band disease and the changing face of Caribbean coral reefs. Hydrobiologia 460:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baird AH, Morse ANC (2004) Induction of metamorphosis in larvae of the brooding corals Acropora palifera and Stylophora pistillata. Mar Freshw Res 55:469–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nyström M (2004) Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429:827–833CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Birrell CL, McCook LJ, Willis BL, Harrington L (2008) Chemical effects of macroalgae on larval settlement of the broadcast spawning coral Acropora millepora. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Golbuu Y, Richmond RH (2007) Substratum preferences in planula larvae of two species of scleractinian corals, Goniastrea retiformis and Stylaraea punctata. Mar Biol 152:639–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrington L, Fabricius K, De’ath G, Negri A (2004) Recognition and selection of settlement substrata determine post-settlement survival in corals. Ecology 85:3428–3437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heyward AJ, Negri AP (1999) Natural inducers for coral larval metamorphosis. Coral Reefs 18:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson J (1992) Pleistocene perspectives on coral reef community structure. Am Zool 32:719–731Google Scholar
  12. Johnson CR, Muir DG, Reysenbach AL (1991) Characteristic bacteria associated with surfaces of coralline algae: a hypothesis for bacterial induction of marine invertebrate larvae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 74:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knowlton N (2001) The future of coral reefs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5419–5425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuffner IB, Paul VJ (2004) Effects of the benthic cyanobacterium Lyngbya majuscula on the larval settlement of the reef corals Acropora surculosa and Pocillopora damicornis. Coral Reefs 23:455–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuffner IB, Walters LJ, Becerro MA, Paul VJ, Ritson-Williams R, Beach K (2006) Inhibition of coral recruitment by macroalgae and cyanobacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 323:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuffner IB, Andersson AJ, Jokiel PL, Rodgers KS, Mackenzie FT (2007) Decreased abundance of crustose coralline algae due to ocean acidification. Nat Geosci 1:114–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Littler MM, Littler DS (1995) A new bacterial disease impacts Pacific coral reefs. Science 267:1356–1360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Littler MM, Littler DS (1997) Disease-induced mass mortality of crustose coralline algae on coral reefs provides rationale for the conservation of herbivorous fish stocks. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:719–724Google Scholar
  19. Macintyre IG (1997) Reevaluating the role of crustose coralline algae in the construction of coral reefs. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:725–730Google Scholar
  20. Macintyre IG, Glynn PW, Steneck RS (2001) Holocene history of Holandes Cays algal ridge, Panama: an algal coated storm deposit. Coral Reefs 20:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller M, Bourque A, Bohnsack J (2002) An analysis of the loss of acroporid corals at Looe Key, Florida, USA: 1983–2000. Coral Reefs 21:179–182Google Scholar
  22. Morse DE, Hooker N, Morse ANC, Jensen RA (1988) Control of larval metamorphosis and recruitment in sympatric agariciid corals. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 116:193–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mumby PJ, Steneck R (2008) Coral reef management and conservation in the light of rapidly-evolving ecological paradigms. Trends Ecol Evol 23:555–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Negri AP, Webster NS, Hill RT, Heyward AJ (2001) Metamorphosis of broadcast spawning corals in response to bacteria isolated from crustose algae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 223:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. NMFS (2006) Endangered and threatened species: final listing determinations for Elkhorn coral and Staghorn coral. Fed Regist 71:26852–26861Google Scholar
  26. Nugues MM, Szmant AM (2006) Coral settlement onto Halimeda opuntia: a fatal attraction to an ephemeral substrate? Coral Reefs 25:585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pandolfi JM, Bradbury RH, Sala E, Hughes TP, Bjorndal KA, Cooke RG, McArdle D, McClenachan L, Newman MJH, Peredes G, Warner RR, Jackson JBC (2003) Global trajectories of the long-term decline of coral reef ecosystems. Science 301:955–958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Raimondi PT, Morse ANC (2000) The consequences of complex larval behavior in a coral. Ecology 81:3193–3211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ritson-Williams R, Arnold S, Fogarty N, Steneck RS, Vermeij MJA, Paul VJ (2009) New perspectives on ecological mechanisms affecting coral recruitment on reefs. Smithson Contrib Mar Sci 38:437–457Google Scholar
  30. Steneck RS (1986) The ecology of coralline algal crusts: convergent patterns and adaptative strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:273–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steneck RS, Adey WH (1976) The role of environment in control of morphology in Lithophyllum congestum, a Caribbean algal ridge builder. Bot Mar 19:197–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steneck RS, Testa V (1997) Are calcareous algae important to reefs today or in the past? Symposium summary. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:685–688Google Scholar
  33. Steneck RS, Hacker SD, Dethier MN (1991) Mechanisms of competitive dominance between crustose coralline algae: an herbivore-mediated competitive reversal. Ecology 72:938–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steneck RS, Macintyre IG, Reid RP (1997) A unique algal ridge system in Exuma Cays, Bahamas. Coral Reefs 16:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vermeij MJA, Sandin S (2008) Density-dependent settlement and mortality structure the earliest life phases of a coral population. Ecology 89:1994–2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Vermeij MJA, Smith JE, Smith CM, Thurber RV, Sandin SA (2009) Survival and settlement success of coral planulae: independent and synergistic effects of macroalgae and microbes. Oecologia 159:325–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Webster NS, Smith LD, Heyward AJ, Watts JEM, Webb RI, Blackall LL, Negri AP (2004) Metamorphosis of a scleractinian coral in response to microbial biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1213–1221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. West JM, Salm RV (2003) Resistance and resilience to coral bleaching: implications for coral reef conservation and management. Conserv Biol 17:956–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Ritson-Williams
    • 1
  • Valerie J. Paul
    • 1
  • S. N. Arnold
    • 2
  • R. S. Steneck
    • 2
  1. 1.Smithsonian Marine Station at Fort PierceFort PierceUSA
  2. 2.School of Marine Sciences, Darling Marine CenterUniversity of MaineWalpoleUSA

Personalised recommendations