Skip to main content

Use of fractal dimensions to quantify coral shape

Coral Reefs volume 26, pages 541–550 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

A morphometrical method to quantify and characterize coral corallites using Richardson Plots and Kaye’s notion of fractal dimensions is presented. A Jurassic coral species (Aplosmilia spinosa) and five Recent coral species were compared using the Box-Counting Method. This method enables the characterization of their morphologies at calicular and septal levels by their fractal dimensions (structural and textural). Moreover, it is possible to determine differences between species of Montastraea and to tackle the high phenotypic plasticity of Montastraea annularis. The use of fractal dimensions versus conventional methods (e.g., measurements of linear dimensions with a calliper, landmarks, Fourier analyses) to explore a rugged boundary object is discussed. It appears that fractal methods have the potential to considerably simplify the morphometrical and statistical approaches, and be a valuable addition to methods based on Euclidian geometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Alloiteau J (1952) Embranchement des coelentérés. In: Piveteau J (ed) Traité de Paléontologie. Masson, Paris, pp 376–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloiteau J (1957) Contribution à la systématique des madréporaires fossiles. C.N.R.S. éds, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Basillais E (1997) Coral surfaces and fractal dimensions: a new method. Compt Rendus Acad Sci III Sci Vie 320:653–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Basillais E (1998) Functional role of the fractal morphology of corals: a full model of the nutrient turbulent diffusion fluxes to a coral reef. Compt Rendus Acad Sci III Sci Vie 321:295–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosellini FR, Stemann TA (1996) Autecological significance of growth form in the scleractinian Actinacis rollei Reuss (Oligocene, Lessini Mountains, Northern Italy). Boll Soc Paleontol Ital Vol Sp 3:31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury RH, Reichelt RE (1983) Fractal dimension of a coral reef at ecological scales. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:169–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd FA (1979) Phenotypic plasticity in the reef corals Montastraea annularis (Ellis & Solander) and Siderastrea siderea (Ellis & Solander). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 39:25–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd AF (1993) Variation within and among morphospecies of Montastraea. Cour Forsch Inst Senckenberg 164:241–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd AF, Johnson KG (1996) Recognizing species of late Cenozoic Scleractinia and their evolutionary patterns. Paleontol Soc Pap 1:59–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd AF, Klaus JS (2001) The origin and early evolution of the Montastraea “annularis” species complex (Anthozoa: Scleractinia). J Paleontol 75:527–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd AF, Pandolfi JM (2004) Overlapping species boundaries and hybridization within the Montastraea “annularis” reef coral complex in the Pleistocene of the Bahama Islands. Paleobiology 30:396–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd AF, Johnson KG, Potts DC (1994) Recognizing morphospecies in colonial reef corals: I- Landmark-based methods. Paleobiology 20:484–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier JP (1971) Les scléractiniaires de la Mélanésie française. Expédition française sur les récifs coralliens de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Editions de la Fondation Singer-Polignac, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder J (1988) Fractals. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill GA (1967) Madréporaires. II. Quelques précisions sur les septes perforés des polypiers mésozoïques. Mem Soc Geol Fr 106:58–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill GA, Lafuste JG (1971) Madréporaires simples du Dogger d’Afghanistan: étude sur les structures de type Montlivaltia. Mem Soc Geol Fr NS 115:1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouyet JF (1992) Physique et structures fractales, Paris

  • Jelinek HF, Fernandez E (1998) Neurons and fractals: how reliable and useful are calculations of fractal dimensions? J Neurosci Methods 81:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaandorp JA (1994) Fractal modelling growth and form in biology. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaandorp JA, Kübler JE (2001) The algorithmic beauty of seeweeds, sponges, and corals. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaandorp JA, Sloot PMA (2001) Morphological models of radiate accretive growth and the influence of hydrodynamics. J Theor Biol 209:257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye BH (1978) Specification of the ruggedness and/or texture of a fine particle profile by its fractal dimension. Powder Tech 21:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye BH (1986) The description of two-dimensional rugged boundaries in fine particle science by means of fractal dimensions. Powder Tech 46:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye BH (1989) A random walk through fractal dimensions, 1st edn. VCH Publisher, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye BH (1994) A random walk through fractal dimensions, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye BH, Clark GG, Kydar Y (1994) Strategies for evaluating boundary fractal dimensions by computer aided image analysis. Part Part Syst Char 11:411–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton N, Weil LA, Guzman HM (1992) Sibling species in Montastrea annularis, coral bleaching, and the coral climate record. Science 255:330–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koby F (1880–1889) Monographie des polypiers jurassiques de la Suisse. Mémoires de la Société Paléontologique Suisse 7–16:1–582

  • Lathuilière B (1988) Analyse de populations d’isastrées bajociennes (scléractiniaires jurassiques de France). Conséquences taxonomiques stratigraphiques et paléoécologiques. Geobios (Paris) 21:269–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathuilière B (1990) Periseris, scléractiniaire colonial jurassique. Révision structurale et taxinomie de populations bajociennes de l’est de la France. Geobios (Paris) 23:33–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathuilière B (2000a) Coraux constructeurs du Bajocien inférieur de France, 1ère partie. Geobios (Paris) 33:51–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathuilière B (2000b) Coraux constructeurs du Bajocien inférieur de France, 2ème partie. Geobios (Paris) 33:153–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathuilière B, Budd AF (1994) Analyse d’image et analyse morphofonctionnelle des coraux. Compt Rendus Acad Sci IIA Sci Ter Plan 318:1273–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathuilière B, Gill GA (1998) Dendraraea corail scléractiniaire branchu jurassique: structure systématique, écologie. Palaeontogr Abt A Palaeozool-Stratigr 248:145–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebovitch LS, Toth T (1989) A fast algorithm to determine fractal dimensions by box-counting. Phys Lett 141:386–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losa GA, Nonnenmacher TF, Merlini D, Weibel ER (eds) (1997) Fractals in biology and medicine, vol II. Birkhaeuser, Basel

  • Losa GA, Merlini D, Nonnenmacher TF, Weibel ER (eds) (2002) Fractals in biology and medicine, vol III. Birkhaeuser, Basel

  • Mancuso S (2001) The fractal dimension of grapevine leaves as a tool for ampelographic research. HarFA—Harmonic and Fractal Image Analysis 6–8

  • Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, W.H., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand-Stiévenart J (1979) Etude de la variabilité du squelette chez les madrépores. Ph.D. thesis Université de Liège, p 264

  • Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE (eds.) (1996) Advances in morphometrics. NATO ASI series, Plenum Press, New York

  • Martin-Garin B (2005) Climatic control of Oxfordian coral reef distribution in the Tethys Ocean. Including a comparative survey of recent coral communities (Indian Ocean) and a new method of coral morphometrics based on fractal dimensions. Ph.D. thesis Universität Bern, p 253

  • Martin-Garin B, Lathuilière B, Geister J (2002) Récifs, coraux et climats oxfordiens de la Téthys. Doc Lab Geol Facul Sci Lyon 156:154–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Maté JL (2003) Ecological, genetic, and morphological differences among three Pavona (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) species from the Pacific coast of Panama. I. P. varians, P. chiriqiensis, and P. frondifera. Mar Biol 142:427–440

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy H, Kaandorp JA (1996) On modeling environmentally-sensitive growth forms and cellular automata using multiset transformation. Fractals 4:509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merks R, Hoekstra A, Kaandorp J, Sloot P (2003) Models of coral growth: spontaneous branching, compactification and the Laplacian growth assumption. J Theor Biol 224:153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelin H (1840–1848) Iconographie zoophytologique. Description par localités et terrains des polypiers fossiles de France. Bertrand Editions, Paris

  • Morse DR, Lawton JH, Dodson MM, Williamson MH (1985) Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths. Nature 314:731–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moussa B (1999) Biometrics analysis of variation in spatangoid echinoid Linthia from the Maastrichtian and Paleocene of the Lullemmeden Basin, Niger, West Africa. In: Daniela M, Candia C, Bonasero F (eds) Echinoderm Research 1998, Rotterdam, pp 341–346

  • Murray JD (1991) Mathematical biology. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonnenmacher TF, Losa GA, Weibel ER (eds) (1994) Fractals in biology and medicine, vol I. Birkhaeuser, Basel

  • d’Orbigny A (1850) Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey DK, Lathuilière B (1997) Variability in Epistreptophyllum from the Middle Jurassic of Kachchh, Western India: an open question for the taxonomy of Mesozoic scleractinian corals. J Paleontol 71:564–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey DK, McRoberts CA, Pandit MK (1999) Dimorpharaea (Scleractinia, Anthozoa) from the Middle Jurassic of Kachchh, India. J Paleontol 73:1015–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts DC, Budd AF, Garthwaite RL (1993) Soft tissue vs. skeletal approaches to species recognition and phylogeny reconstruction in corals. Cour Forsch Inst Senckenberg 164:221–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Prusinkiewicz P (1993) Modeling and visualization of biological structures. In: Proceeding of Graphics Interface, pp 128–137

  • Prusinkiewicz P, Hammel M, Hanan J, Mech R (1996) Visual models of plant development. In: Rozenberg G, Salomaa A (eds) Handbook of formal languages. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Purkis SJ, Riegl BM, Andréfouët S (2005) Remote sensing of geomorphology and facies patterns on a modern carbonate ramp (Arabian Gulf, Dubai, U.A.E.). J Sediment Res 75:861–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purkis SJ, Riegl BM, Dodge RE (2006) Fractal patterns of coral communities: evidence from remote sensing. In: Proc 10th Int Coral Reef Symp, pp 1753–1762

  • Rohlf FJ (1990) Fitting curves to outlines. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL (eds) 2nd Michigan morphometrics workshop. Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, pp 167–177

  • Rohlf FJ, Slice D (1990) Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39:40–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlák O, Zmeškal O, Komendová B, Dzik P (2002) HarFA—The use of fractal analysis for the determination of cell diameter—model calculation. HarFA—Harmonic and Fractal Image Analysis 19–20

  • Slice D (1993) The fractal analysis of shape. In: Marcus LF, Bello E, Garciá-Valdecasas A (eds) Contributions to morphometrics. Mus Nac Cienc Nat, Madrid, pp 166–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Jr TG, Marks WB, Lang GD, Sheriff Jr WH, Neal EA (1989) A fractal analysis of cell images. J Neurosci Methods 27:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teich MC, Lowen SB (1994) Fractal patterns in auditory nerve-spike trains. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 13:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricot C (1982) Two definitions of fractional dimension. Math Proc Camb Phil Soc 91:57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Veghel MLJ, Bak RPM (1993) Intraspecific variation of a dominant Caribbean reef building coral. Montastrea annularis: genetic, behavioral and morphometric aspects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 92:255–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia EP (1996) Morphometry of microstromatolites in calcrete laminar crusts and a fractal model of their growth. Math Geol 28:87–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia EP, Van Grootel G, Guillemet G (1996) Classification of Chitinozoa (llandoverian, Canada) using image analysis. Microsc Microanal Microstruct 7:461–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veselá M, Zmeškal O, Veselý M, Nežádal M (2002) The use of fractal analysis for the determination of yeast cell diameter. HarFA—Harmonic and Fractal Image Analysis:21–22

  • Vicsek T (1992) Fractal growth phenomena, 2nd edn. World Scientific, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlcek J, Cheung E (1986) Fractal analysis of leaf shapes. Can J For Res 16:124–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram S (2002) A new kind of science. Wolfram Media, Incorporation, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmeškal O, Nežádal M, Buchnícek M, Bzatek T (2001a) HarFA—Harmonic and Fractal Image Analyser, software. http://www.fch.vutbr.cz/lectures/imagesci/. University of Technology, Brno

  • Zmeškal O, Veselý M, Nežádal M, Buchnícek M (2001b) Fractal analysis of image structures. HarFA—Harmonic and Fractal Image Analysis 3–5

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are greatly indebted to the staff of thin-section preparation: Vlado Grečo from the Institute of Geology at Berne, and to Michel Lemoine of the Muséum National d’Histoires Naturelles at Paris for impregnation of Recent coral skeletons with artificial resin. Finally, we are grateful to Martin Engi (Berne), for reviewing our French–German English, and to our reviewers for their constructive remarks. This research was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 21-61834.00).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tethys Ocean, 15 impasse Ramel, 83320, Carqueiranne, France

    B. Martin-Garin

  2. Institut fuer Geologie der Universitaet Bern, Baltzerstrasse 1, 3012, Bern, Switzerland

    B. Martin-Garin

  3. G2R, Nancy-Université, CNRS, BP 239, 54506, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France

    B. Lathuilière

  4. Institut de Géologie de l’Université de Neuchâtel, Rue Emile Argand 11, 2007, Neuchâtel, Switzerland

    E. P. Verrecchia

  5. Abteilung Erdwissenschaften, Paläontologie, Naturhistorisches Museum, Bernastrasse 15, 3005, Bern, Switzerland

    J. Geister

  6. Institut fuer Geologie der Universitaet Bern, Baltzerstrasse 1, 3012, Bern, Switzerland

    J. Geister

Authors
  1. B. Martin-Garin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Lathuilière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. P. Verrecchia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Geister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Martin-Garin.

Additional information

Communicated by Geology Editor B. Riegl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin-Garin, B., Lathuilière, B., Verrecchia, E.P. et al. Use of fractal dimensions to quantify coral shape. Coral Reefs 26, 541–550 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-007-0256-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-007-0256-4

Keywords

  • Fractal
  • Corallite
  • Method
  • Morphology
  • Variability