Coral Reefs

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 217–223 | Cite as

Coral reef rehabilitation through transplantation of staghorn corals: effects of artificial stabilization and mechanical damages

Report

Abstract

In order to develop and test a low-cost method of coral reef rehabilitation, the staghorn corals Acropora muricata and A. vaughani were transplanted to a shallow site with unstable substrate. To avoid abrasion, dislodgement and transport due to water movement, the transplanted corals were tied to string sections, which were connected at the seabed to form a grid. This created stability and improved the survival of the corals. The average increase in weight of live coral over 1 year was 56%, eight times more than the control treatment with unattached coral branches. This difference was mainly due to a reduced partial mortality among smaller coral fragments in the stabilized treatment. Survival was positively related to initial size among the loosely placed coral branches, whereas the attached treatment showed a negative relation between size and relative increase in weight of the surviving parts of the coral branches. Coral fragments were not significantly affected by severe physical damage simulating the effects of handling.

Keywords

Coral reef rehabilitation Coral transplantation Coral growth Acropora muricata Acropora vaughani 

References

  1. Alcala AC, Gomez ED (1979) Recolonization and growth of hermatypic corals in dynamite-blasted coral reefs in the central Visayas, Philippines. In: Proc Int Symp Mar Biogeogr EYOI S Hemisphere, pp 645-661Google Scholar
  2. Alcala AC, Gomez ED (1987) Dynamiting coral reefs for fish: a resource-destructive fishing method In: Salvat B (ed) Human impacts on coral reefs: facts and recommendations. Antenne Museum, French Polynesia, pp 51-60Google Scholar
  3. Auberson B (1982) Coral transplantation: an approach to the reestablishment of damaged reefs. Kalikasan 11:158-172Google Scholar
  4. Berker LC, Mueller E (1999) The culture, transplantation and storage of Montastrea faveolata, Acropora cervicornis and A. palmata: what we have learned so far. In: Proc Int Conf on Scientific Aspects of Coral Reef Assessment, Monitoring and Restoration, National Coral Reef Institute, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkeland C, Randall RH, Grimm G (1979) Three methods of coral transplantation for the purpose of reestablishing a coral community in the thermal effluent area at the Tanguisson power plant. Tech Rep 60, University of GuamGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchon P, Jones B, Kalbfleisch W (1997) Anatomy of a fringing reef around Grand Cayman: storm rubble, not coral framework. J Sediment Res 67:1-16Google Scholar
  7. Bowden-Kerby A (1997) Coral transplantation in sheltered habitats using unattached fragments and cultured colonies. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:2063-2068Google Scholar
  8. Brown BE, Dunne RP (1988) The environmental impact of coral mining on coral reefs in the Maldives. Environ Conserv 15:159-166Google Scholar
  9. Bruno JF (1998) Fragmentation in Madracis mirabilis (Duchassaing and Michelotti): how common is size-specific fragment survivorship in corals? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 230:169-181Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter KE, Alcala AC (1977) Muro-ami and Kayakas reef fisheries, benefit or bane? Philipp J Fish 15:217-135Google Scholar
  11. Clark S, Edwards AJ (1995) Coral transplantation as an aid to reef rehabilitation: evaluation of a case study in the Maldive Islands. Coral Reefs 14:201-213Google Scholar
  12. Connell JH (1973) Population ecology of reef-building corals. In: Jones OA, Endean R (eds) Biology and geology of coral reefs. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards AJ, Clark S (1999) Coral transplantation: a useful management tool or misguided meddling? Mar Pollut Bull 37:474-487Google Scholar
  14. Fox HE, Pet JS, Daburi R, Caldwell RL (2000) Recovery in rubble fields: long term impacts of blast fishing. Proc 9th Int Coral Reef SympGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilmore MD, Hall BR (1976) Life history, grow habits and constructional roles of Acropora cervicornis in the patch reef environment. J Sediment Petrol 46:519-522Google Scholar
  16. Guzman HM (1991) Restoration of coral reefs in Pacific Costa Rica. Conserv Biol 5:189-195Google Scholar
  17. Hall VR (1997) Interspecific differences in the regeneration of artificial injuries on scleractinian corals. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 212:9-23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harriott VJ, Fisk DA (1988a) Accelerated regeneration of hard corals: a manual for coral reef users and managers. Tech Memo 16, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Google Scholar
  19. Harriott VJ, Fisk DA (1988b) Coral transplantation as a reef management option. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp, pp 375-379Google Scholar
  20. Highsmith RC (1982) Reproduction by fragmentation in corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7:207-226Google Scholar
  21. Highsmith RC, Riggs AC, D'Antonio CM (1980) Survival of hurricane-generated coral (Acropora palmata) fragments and a disturbance model of reef calcification growth rates. Oecologia 46(3):322-329Google Scholar
  22. Hildemann WH, Linthicum DS, Vann DC (1975) Transplantation and immunoincompatibility reactions among reef-building corals. Immunogenetics 2:269-284Google Scholar
  23. Hudson JH (2000) History and use of quick-setting Portland cement to transplant corals: two decades of proof that it works. Proc 9th Int Coral Reef SympGoogle Scholar
  24. Hudson JH, Diaz R (1988) Damage survey and restoration of MN Wellwood grounding site, Molasses Reef, Key Largo National Marine Sanctuary. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:231-236Google Scholar
  25. Hughes TP, Jackson JBC (1985) Population dynamics and life histories of foliaceous corals. Ecol Monogr 55(2):141-166Google Scholar
  26. Kaly UL (1995) Experimental test of the effects of methods of attachment and handling on the rapid transplantation of corals. Tech Rep1, CRC Reef Research Centre, Townsville, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  27. Knowlton N, Lang JC, Keller BD (1988) Fates of staghorn coral isolates on hurricane-damaged reefs in Jamaica: the role of predators. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:83-88Google Scholar
  28. Kobayashi A (1984) Regeneration and regrowth of fragmented colonies of the hermatypic corals Acropora formosa and Acropora nasuta. Galaxia 3:13-23Google Scholar
  29. Lewis JB (1991) Testing the coral fragment size-dependent survivorship hypothesis for the calcareous hydrozoan Millepora complanata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 70:101Google Scholar
  30. Liddle MJ, Kay AM (1987) Resistance, survival and recovery of trampled corals on the Great Barrier Reef. Biol Conserv 42:1-18Google Scholar
  31. Lindahl U (1998) Low-tech rehabilitation of degraded coral reefs through transplantation of staghorn corals. Ambio 27:645-650Google Scholar
  32. Lindahl U, Öhman MC, Schelten CK (2001) The 1997/1998 mass mortality of corals: effects on fish communities on a Tanzanian coral reef. Mar Pollut Bull 42(2):127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Maragos JE (1974) Coral transplantation: a method to create, preserve and manage coral reefs. UNIHI-SEAGRANT-AR-74-03, CORMAR-14, University of HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  34. Maragos JE (1978) Coral growth: geometrical relationships. In: Stoddart DR, Johannes RE (eds) Coral reef research methods. UNESCO, Paris, pp 543–550Google Scholar
  35. Nagelkerken I, Bouma S, van den Akker S, Bak RPM (2000) Growth and survival of unattached Madracis mirabilis fragments transplanted to different reef sites, and the implication for reef rehabilitation. Bull Mar Sci 66(2):497-505Google Scholar
  36. Newman HN, Chuan CS (1994) Transplanting a coral reef: a Singapore community project. Coast Manage Tropical Asia 3:11-14Google Scholar
  37. Plucer-Rosario G, Randall RH (1987) Preservation of rare coral species by transplantation and examination of their recruitment and growth. Bull Mar Sci 41:585-593Google Scholar
  38. Riegl B, Luke KE (1998) Ecological parameters of dynamited reefs in the northern Red Sea and their relevance to reef rehabilitation. Mar Pollut Bull 37:488-498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rinkevich B (2000) Steps toward the evaluation of coral reef restoration by using small branch fragments. Mar Biol 136:807-812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rinkevich B, Loya Y (1985) Intraspecific competition in a reef coral: effects on growth and reproduction. Oecologia 66:100-105Google Scholar
  41. Rogers CS, Suchanek TH, Pecora FA (1982) Effects of Hurricanes David and Frederick (1979) on shallow Acropora palmata reef communities: St Croix, US Virgin Islands. Bull Mar Sci 32:532-548Google Scholar
  42. Sano M, Shimizu M, Nose Y (1987) Long-term effects of destruction of hermatypic corals by Acanthaster planci infestation on reef fish communities at Iriomote Island, Japan. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 37:191-199Google Scholar
  43. Schumacher H, Schillak L (1994) Integrated electrochemical and biogenic deposition of hard material—a nature–like colonization substrate. Bull Mar Sci 55:672-679Google Scholar
  44. Smith LD, Hughes TP (1999) An experimental assessment of survival, re-attachment and fecundity of coral fragments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 235:147-164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spurgeon JPG, Lindahl U (2000) Economics of coral reef restoration. In: Cesar H (ed) Collected essays on the economics of coral reefs. CORDIO, Kalmar University, Kalmar, Sweden, pp 125-136Google Scholar
  46. Tomlinson D, Pratt R (1999) Commercial applications of coral reef restoration. In: Proc Int Conf on Scientific Aspects of Coral Reef Assessment, Monitoring and Restoration, National Coral Reef Institute, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  47. Tunnicliffe V (1981) Breakage and propagation of the stony coral Acropora cervicornis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:2427-2431Google Scholar
  48. Yap HT, Gomez ED (1984) Growth of Acropora pulchra II. Responses of natural and transplanted colonies to temperature and day length. Mar Biol 81:209-215Google Scholar
  49. Yap HT, Alino PM, Gomez ED (1992) Trends in growth and mortality of three coral species (Anthozoa: Scleractinia), including effects of transplantation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 83:91-101Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kristineberg Marine Research StationFiskebackskilSweden

Personalised recommendations