Skip to main content
Log in

Kritische Betrachtung einer Besprechung

Critical consideration of a critique

  • Kommentar
  • Published:
Manuelle Medizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT et al (2011) Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:S54–S68

  2. Rubinstein SM, Terwee CB, Assendelft WJ et al (2013) Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain: an update of the cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E158–E177

  3. Rubinstein SM, Middelkoop M van, Assendelft WJ et al (2011) Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain: an update of a Cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E825–E846

  4. Walker BF, French SD, Grant W, Green S (2011) A Cochrane review of combined chiropractic interventions for low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:230–242

  5. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF et al (2011) Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 41:1073–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Normand SL (1999) Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting. Stat Med 18:321–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smeets R, Koke A, Lin CW et al (2011) Measures of function in low back pain/disorders: Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63(Suppl 11):S158–S173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, Tulder M van (2009) 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1929–1941

  9. Chandler J, Churchill R, Higgins J et al (2013) Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR). http://editorial-unit.cochrane.org/sites/editorial-unit.cochrane.org/files/uploads/MECIR_conduct_standards%202.3%2002122013.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22. März 2015

  10. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fairbank JC (2007) Use and abuse of oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2787–2789

  12. Madsen MV, Gotzsche PC, Hrobjartsson A (2009) Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomised clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups. BMJ 338:a3115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P et al (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:90–94

Download references

Danksagung

Wir danken dem Herausgeber für die Möglichkeit zu einer Erwiderung.

Interessenkonflikt

H. Franke, J.-D. Franke und G. Fryer geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Fryer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franke, H., Franke, JD. & Fryer, G. Kritische Betrachtung einer Besprechung. Manuelle Medizin 53, 229–232 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00337-015-1234-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00337-015-1234-5

Navigation