Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effizienz einer minimalen psychosozialen Intervention bei Patienten mit subakuten Kreuzschmerzen

  • Literatur im Fokus
  • Published:
Manuelle Medizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Jellema P, Windt DAWM van der, Horst HE van der et al. (2005) Should treatment of (sub)acute low back pain be aimed at psychosocial prognostic factors? Results of a cluster-randomised clinical trial in general practice. BMJ 331: 84–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jellema P, Windt DAWM van der, Horst HE van der et al. (2005) Why is a treatment aimed at psychosocial factors not effective in patients with (sub)acute low back pain? Pain 118: 350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jellema P, Horst HE van der, Vlaeyen JWS et al. (2006) Predictors of outcome in patients with (sub)acute low back pain differ across treatment groups. Spine 31: 1699–1705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jellema P, Roer N van der, Windt DAWM van der et al. (2007) Low back pain in general practice: cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychosocial intervention versus usual care. Eur Spine J 16: 1812–1821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roer van der, Boos N, Tulder MW van (2006) Economic evaluations: a new avenue of outcome assessment in spinal disorders. Eur J Spine 15: S109–S117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. UK BEAM Trial Team (2004) United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ 329: 1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rivero-Arias O, Gray A, Frost H et al. (2006) Cost-utility analysis of physiotherapy treatment compared with physiotherapy advice in low back pain. Spine 31: 1381–1387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Luijsterburg PAJ, Lamers LM, Verhagen AP et al. (2007) Cost-effectiveness of physical therapy and general practitioner care for sciatica. Spine 32: 1942–1948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seferlis T, Lindholm L, Nemeth G (2000) Cost-minimisation analysis of three conservative treatment programmes in 180 sick-listed for acute low-back pain. Scand J Prim Health Care 18: 53–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Briggs AH, O’Brien BJ (2001) The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Econ 10: 179–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tulder MW van (2002) Low back pain. Best practice and research. Clin Rheumatol 16: 761–775

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lucas N (2005) Psychosocial factors in osteopathic practice: to what extent should they be assessed? Int J Osteopath Med 8: 49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Langworthy JM, Breen AC (2006) Psychosocial factors and their predictive value in chiropractic patients with low back pain: a prospective inception cohort study. Chiropr Osteopat 15: 5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Zamora J et al. (2005) The transition from acute to subacute and chronic low back pain. A study based on determinants of quality of life and prediction of chronic disability. Spine 30: 1786–1792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hilfiker R, Bachmann LM, Heitz CAM et al. (2007) Value of predictive instruments to determine persisting restriction of function in patients with subacute non-specific low back pain. Systematic review. Eur Spine J 16: 1755–1775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Tulder M van et al. (2001) Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain in working-age adults: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 26: 262–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Pohjolainen T et al. (2003) Mini-intervention for subacute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine 28: 533–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hay EM, Mullis R, Lewis M et al. (2005) Comparison of physical treatments versus a brief pain management programme for back pain in primary care: a randomised clinical trial in physiotherapy practice. Lancet 365: 2024–2030

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liddle SD, Gracey JK, Baxter GD (2007) Advice for the management of low back pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Man Ther 12: 310–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Effizienz einer minimalen psychosozialen Intervention bei Patienten mit subakuten Kreuzschmerzen. Manuelle Medizin 46, 32–39 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00337-007-0570-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00337-007-0570-5

Navigation