Mammalian Genome

, Volume 7, Issue 9, pp 650–653 | Cite as

A threshold model analysis of deafness in Dalmatians

  • T. R. Famula
  • A. M. Oberbauer
  • C. A. Sousa
Original Contribution


To elucidate the inheritance of deafness in Dalmatian dogs, 825 dogs in 111 litters were evaluated for abnormalities in hearing through the brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER). Recorded along with their quality of hearing (normal, unilaterally deaf, or bilaterally deaf) were the sex, coat color, eye color and the presence or absence of a color patch. The analysis considered deafness an ordered categorical trait in a threshold model. The underlying, unobservable continuous variate of the threshold model was assumed to be a linear function of sex of dog, coat color (black or liver and white), color patch (presence or absence), eye color, the deafness phenotype of the parents and a random family effect. Twenty-six percent of dogs were deaf in at least one ear. Eye color, color patch, sex and the hearing status of the parents were all significant contributions to deafness. The heritability of deafness, on the continuous unobservable scale, was 0.21. This value was computed after correction for eye color, color patch, parental hearing status and sex, implying that significant genetic variation exists beyond the contribution of several single loci.


Normal Hearing Threshold Model Color Patch Endocochlear Potential Brainstem Auditory Evoke Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, H., Henricson, B., Lundquist, P.G., Wedenberg, E., Wersäll, J. (1968). Genetic hearing impairment in the Dalmatian dog. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 232, 1–34.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, K.S., Bergsma, D.R., Barrow, M.V. (1971). Animal models of pigment and hearing abnormalities in man. In Birth Defects: Original Article Series, D. Bergsma, ed., vol VII, no 4. (Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins), pp. 102–109.Google Scholar
  3. Cable, J., Barkway, C., Steel, K.P. (1992). Characteristics of stria vascularis melanocytes of viable dominant spotting (Wv/Wv) mouse mutants. Hear. Res. 64, 6–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cable, J., Jackson, I.J., Steel, K.P. (1993). Light (Blt), a mutation that causes melanocyte death, affects stria vascularis function in the mouse inner ear. Pigm. Cell Res. 6, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cable, J., Huzar, D., Jaenisch, R., Steel, K.P. (1994). Effects of mutations at the W locus (c-kit) on inner ear pigmentation and function in the mouse. Pigm. Cell Res. 7, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dempster, E.R., Lerner, I.M. (1950). Heritability of threshold characters. Genetics 35, 212–235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Erickson, C.A. (1993). From the crest to the periphery: control of pigment cell migration and lineage segregation. Pigm. Cell Res. 6, 336–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falconer, D.S. (1989). Introduction to quantitative genetics. (London: Longman Scientific and Technical), pp. 300–312.Google Scholar
  9. Gianola, D., Foulley, J.L. (1983). Sire evaluation for ordered categorical data with a threshold model. Genet. Sel. Evol. 15, 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greibrokk, T. (1994). Hereditary deafness in the Dalmatian: relationship to eye and coat color. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 30, 170–176.Google Scholar
  11. Harville, D.A., Mee, R.W. (1984). A mixed model procedure for analyzing ordered categorical data. Biometrics 40, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayes, H.M., Wilson, G.P., Fenner, W.R., Wyman, M. (1981). Canine congenital deafness: epidemiologic study of 272 cases. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 17, 473–476.Google Scholar
  13. Holliday, T.A., Te Selle, M.E. (1985). Brainstem auditory evoked potentials of dogs: wave forms and effects of electrode positions. Am. J. Vet. Res 46, 845–851.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Holliday, T.A., Nelson, H.J., Williams, D.C., Willits, N. (1992). Unilateral and bilateral brainstem auditory-evoked response abnormalities in 900 Dalmatian dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 6, 166–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnsson, L.G., Hawkins, J.E., Murasaki, A.A., Preston, R.E. (1973). Vascular anatomy and pathology in the cochlea in Dalmatian dogs. In Vascular Disorders and Hearing Defects, A.J. De Lorenzo, ed. (Baltimore: University Park Press), pp. 249–293.Google Scholar
  16. Mair, I.W.A. (1976). Hereditary deafness in the Dalmatian dog. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 212, 1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nelson, H.J. (1991). Deafness in Dalmatians—1986. Spots of news. J. Br. Dalmatian Club 362, 10–12.Google Scholar
  18. Rawitz, B. (1896). Gehörorgan und Gehirn eines weissen Hundes mit blauen Augen. Morphol. Arb. 6, 545–553.Google Scholar
  19. Schaible, R.H. (1982). Animal model of syndrome characterized by piebaldism and sensorineural deafness. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 34, 156A.Google Scholar
  20. Searle, A.G. (1968). Comparative genetics of coat colour in mammals. (London: Logos Press Ltd.), pp. 164–73.Google Scholar
  21. Sims, M.H., Moore, R.E. (1984). Auditory evoked response in the clinically normal dog: early latency components. Am. J. Vet. Res. 45, 2019–2027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Steel, K.P., Bock, G.R. (1983). Hereditary inner-ear abnormalities in animals. Arch. Otolaryngol. 109, 22–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Strain, G.M., Kearney, M.T., Gignac, I.J., Levesque, D.C., Nelson, H.J., Tedford, B.L., Remson, L.G. (1992). Brainstem auditory-evoked potential assessment of congenital deafness in Dalmatians: associations with phenotypic markers. J. Vet. Int. Med. 6, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Suga, F., Hattler, K.W. (1970). Physiological and histopathological correlates of hereditary deafness in animals. Laryngoscope 80, 81–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. Famula
    • 1
  • A. M. Oberbauer
    • 1
  • C. A. Sousa
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Animal ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Animal Dermatology ClinicSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations