Mammalian Genome

, Volume 25, Issue 5–6, pp 223–234 | Cite as

The uncharacterized gene 1700093K21Rik and flanking regions are correlated with reproductive isolation in the house mouse, Mus musculus

  • David H. Kass
  • Václav Janoušek
  • Liuyang Wang
  • Priscilla K. Tucker
Article
  • 262 Downloads

Abstract

Reproductive barriers exist between the house mouse subspecies, Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus, members of the Mus musculus species complex, primarily as a result of hybrid male infertility, and a hybrid zone exists where their ranges intersect in Europe. Using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) diagnostic for the two taxa, the extent of introgression across the genome was previously compared in these hybrid populations. Sixty-nine of 1316 autosomal SNPs exhibited reduced introgression in two hybrid zone transects suggesting maladaptive interactions among certain loci. One of these markers is within a region on chromosome 11 that, in other studies, has been associated with hybrid male sterility of these subspecies. We assessed sequence variation in a 20 Mb region on chromosome 11 flanking this marker, and observed its inclusion within a roughly 150 kb stretch of DNA showing elevated sequence differentiation between the two subspecies. Four genes are associated with this genomic subregion, with two entirely encompassed. One of the two genes, the uncharacterized 1700093K21Rik gene, displays distinguishing features consistent with a potential role in reproductive isolation between these subspecies. Along with its expression specifically within spermatogenic cells, we present various sequence analyses that demonstrate a high rate of molecular evolution of this gene, as well as identify a subspecies amino acid variant resulting in a structural difference. Taken together, the data suggest a role for this gene in reproductive isolation.

Supplementary material

335_2014_9506_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (76 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 75 kb)

References

  1. Albrechtová J, Albrecht T, Baird SJE, Macholán M, Rudolfsen G, Munclinger P, Tucker PK, Piálek J (2012) Sperm-related phenotypes implicated in both maintenance and breakdown of a natural species barrier in the house mouse. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:4803–4810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen WR, Skidmore JA, Stewart F, Antczak DF (1993) Effects of fetal genotype and uterine environment on placental development in equids. J Reprod Fert 98:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird SJE, Macholán M (2012) What can the Mus musculus musculus/M. m. domesticus hybrid zone tell us about speciation? In: Macholán M, Baird SJE, Munclinger P, Piálek J (eds) Evolution of the house mouse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 334–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharyya T, Gregorova S, Mihola O, Anger M, Sebestova J, Denny P, Simecek P, Forejt J (2013) Mechanistic basis of infertility of mouse intersubspecific hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:E468–E477PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bímová B, Karn RC, Piálek J (2005) The role of salivary androgen-binding protein in reproductive isolation between two subspecies of house mouse: Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus. Biol Linn Soc 84:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjorkman J, Gould SJ, Crane DI (2002) Pex13, the mouse ortholog of the human peroxisome biogenesis disorder PEX13 gene: gene structure, tissue expression, and localization of the protein to peroxisomes. Genomics 79:162–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boursot P, Belkhir K (2006) Mouse SNPs for evolutionary biology: beware of ascertainment biases. Genome Res 16:1191–1192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Britton-Davidian J, Catalan J, da Graca Ramalhinho M, Auffray JC, Claudia Nunes A, Gazave E, Searle JB, da Luz Mathias M (2005) Chromosomal phylogeny of Robertsonian races of the house mouse on the island of Madeira: testing between alternative mutational processes. Genet Res 86:171–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crespi B, Nosil P (2013) Conflictual speciation: species formation via genomic conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 28:48–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diez-Roux G, Banfi S, Sultan M, Geffers L, Anand S, Rozado D, Magen A, Canidio E, Pagani M, Peluso I, Lin-Marq N, Koch M, Bilio M, Cantiello I, Verde R, De Masi C, Bianchi SA, Cicchini J, Perroud E, Mehmeti S, Dagand E, Schrinner S, Nurnberger A, Schmidt K, Metz K, Zwingmann C, Brieske N, Springer C, Hernandez AM, Herzog S, Grabbe F, Sieverding C, Fischer B, Schrader K, Brockmeyer M, Dettmer S, Helbig C, Alunni V, Battaini MA, Mura C, Henrichsen CN, Garcia-Lopez R, Echevarria D, Puelles E, Garcia-Calero E, Kruse S, Uhr M, Kauck C, Feng GJ, Milyaev N, Ong CK, Kumar L, Lam M, Semple CA, Gyenesei A, Mundlos S, Radelof U, Lehrach H, Sarmientos P, Reymond A, Davidson DR, Dolle P, Antonarakis SE, Yaspo ML, Martinez S, Baldock RA, Eichele G, Ballabio A (2011) A High-Resolution Anatomical atlas of the transcriptome in the mouse embryo. PLoS Biol 9:e1000582PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobzhansky T (1970) Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Dod B, Jermiin LS, Boursot P, Chapman VH, Nielsen JT, Bonhomme F (1993) Counterselection on sex-chromosomes in the Mus-Musculus European hybrid zone. J Evol Biol 6:529–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dzur-Gejdosova M, Simecek P, Gregorova S, Bhattacharyya T, Forejt J (2012) Dissecting the genetic architecture of F1 hybrid sterility in house mice. Evolution 11:3321–3335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flachs P, Mihola O, Simeček P, Gregorová S, Schimenti JC, Matsui Y, Baudat F, de Massy B, Piálek J, Forejt J, Trachtulec Z (2012) Interallelic and intergenic incompatibilities of the Prdm9 (Hst1) gene in mouse hybrid sterility. PLoS Genet 8:e1003044PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forejt J (1996) Hybrid sterility in the mouse. Trends Genet 12:412–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forejt J, Ivanyi P (1974) Genetic studies on male sterility of hybrids between laboratory and wild mice (Mus musculus L.). Genet Res 24:189–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forejt J, Vincek V, Klein J, Lehrach H, Loudova-Mickova M (1991) Genetic mapping of the t-complex region on mouse chromosome 17 including the hybrid sterility-1 gene. Mamm Genome 1:84–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geraldes A, Basset P, Gibson B, Smith KL, Harr B, Yu HT, Bulatova N, Ziv Y, Nachman MW (2008) Inferring the history of speciation in house mice from autosomal, X-linked, Y-linked and mitochondrial genes. Mol Ecol 17:5349–5363PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geraldes A, Basset P, Gibson B, Smith KL, Nachman MW (2011) Higher differentiation among subspecies of the house mouse (Mus musculus) in genomic regions with low recombination. Mol Ecol 20:4722–4736PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gompert Z, Buerkle CA (2009) A powerful regression-based method for admixture mapping of isolation across the gnomes of hybrids. Mol Ecol 18:1207–1212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Good JM, Dean MD, Nachman MW (2008a) A complex genetic basis to X-linked hybrid male sterility between two species of house mice. Genetics 179:2213–2228PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Good JM, Handel MA, Nachman MW (2008b) Asymmetry and polymorphism of hybrid male sterility during the early stages of speciation in house mice. Evolution 62:50–65PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Good JM, Giger T, Dean MD, Nachman MW (2010) Widespread over-expression of the X chromosome in sterile F(1)hybrid mice. PLoS Genet 6:e1001148PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Good JM, Vanderpool D, Smith KL, Nachman MW (2011) Extraordinary sequence divergence at Tsga8, an X-linked gene involved in mouse spermiogenesis. Mol Biol Evol 28:1675–1686PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gregorova S, Divina P, Storchova R, Trachtulec Z, Fotopulosova V, Svenson KL, Donahue LR, Paigen B, Forejt J (2008) Mouse consomic strains: exploiting genetic divergence between Mus m. musculus and Mus m. domesticus subspecies. Genome Res 18:509–515PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hale DW, Washburn LL, Eicher EM (1993) Meiotic abnormalities in hybrid mice of the C57BL/6J × Mus spretus cross suggest a cytogenetic basis for Haldane’s rule of hybrid sterility. Cytogenet Cell Genet 63:221–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harr B (2006a) Genomic islands of differentiation between house mouse subspecies. Genome Res 16:730–737PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harr B (2006b) Regions of high differentiation—worth a check. Genome Res 16:1193–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hong S, Choi I, Woo JM, Oh J, Kim T, Choi E, Kim TW, Jung YK, Kim DH, Sun CH, Yi GS, Eddy EM, Cho C (2005) Identification and integrative analysis of 28 novel genes specifically expressed and developmentally regulated in murine spermatogenic cells. J Biol Chem 280:7685–7693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Howard DJ, Waring GL (1991) Topographic diversity, zone width, and the strength of reproductive isolation in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution 45:1120–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Janousek V, Wang LY, Luzynski K, Dufkova P, Vyskocilova MM, Nachman MW, Munclinger P, Macholan M, Pialek J, Tucker PK (2012) Genome-wide architecture of reproductive isolation in a naturally occurring hybrid zone between Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus. Mol Ecol 21:3032–3047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jiggins CD, McMillan WO, Neukirchen W, Mallet J (1996) What can hybrid zones tell us about speciation? The case of Heliconius erato and H. himera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol J Linn Soc 59:221–242Google Scholar
  33. Keane TM, Goodstadt L, Danecek P, White MA, Wong K, Yalcin B, Heger A, Agam A, Slater G, Goodson M, Furlotte NA, Eskin E, Nellåker C, Whitley H, Cleak J, Janowitz D, Hernandez-Pliego P, Edwards A, Belgard TG, Oliver PL, McIntyre RE, Bhomra A, Nicod J, Gan X, Yuan W, van der Weyden L, Steward CA, Bala S, Stalker J, Mott R, Durbin R, Jackson IJ, Czechanski A, Guerra-Assunção JA, Donahue LR, Reinholdt LG, Payseur BA, Ponting CP, Birney E, Flint J, Adams DJ (2011) Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477:289–294PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Linding R, Jensen LJ, Diella F, Bork P, Gibson TJ, Russell RB (2003) Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics. Structure 11:1453–1459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Macholan M, Munclinger P, Sugerkova M, Dufkova P, Bimova B, Bozikova E, Zima J, Pialek J (2007) Genetic analysis of autosomal and X-linked markers across a mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 61:746–771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Vlcek C, Schimenti JC, Forejt J (2009) A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 323:373–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Monteiro CA, Serrao EA, Pearson GA (2012) Prezygotic barriers to hybridization in marine broadcast spawners: reproductive timing and mating system variation. PLoS One 7:e35978PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oka A, Mita A, Sakurai-Yamatani N, Yamamoto H, Takagi N, Takano-Shimizu T, Toshimori K, Moriwaki K, Shiroishi T (2004) Hybrid breakdown caused by substitution of the X chromosome between two mouse subspecies. Genetics 166:913–924PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oka A, Aoto T, Totsuka Y, Takahashi R, Ueda M, Mita A, Sakurai-Yamatani N, Yamamoto H, Kuriki S, Takagi N, Moriwaki K, Shiroishi T (2007) Disruption of genetic interaction between two autosomal regions and the X chromosome causes reproductive isolation between mouse strains derived from different subspecies. Genetics 175:185–197PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Orr HA (2005) The genetic basis of reproductive isolation: insights from Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6522–6526PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Payseur BA, Krenz JG, Nachman MW (2004) Differential patterns of introgression across the X chromosome in a hybrid zone between two species of house mice. Evolution 58:2064–2078PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shi W, Krella A, Orth A, Yu Y, Fundele R (2005) Widespread disruption of genomic imprinting in adult interspecies mouse (Mus) hybrids. Genesis 43:100–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smadja G, Catalan J, Ganem C (2004) Strong premating divergence in a unimodal hybrid zone between two subspecies of the house mouse. J Evol Biol 17:165–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Storchova R, Gregorova S, Buckiova D, Kyselova V, Divina P, Forejt J (2004) Genetic analysis of X-linked hybrid sterility in the house mouse. Mamm Genome 15:515–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Teeter KC, Payseur BA, Harris LW, Bakewell MA, Thibodeau LM, O’Brien JE, Krenz JG, Sans-Fuentes MA, Nachman MW, Tucker PK (2008) Genome-wide patterns of gene flow across a house mouse hybrid zone. Genome Res 18:67–76PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tucker PK, Sage RD, Warner J, Wilson AC, Eicher EM (1992) Abrupt cline for sex-chromosomes in a hybrid zone between 2 species of mice. Evolution 46:1146–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turner LM, Schwahn DJ, Harr B (2012) Reduced male fertility is common but highly variable in form and severity in a natural house mouse hybrid zone. Evolution 66:443–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Voolstra C, Tautz D, Farbrother P, Eichinger L, Harr B (2007) Contrasting evolution of expression differences in the testis between species and subspecies of the house mouse. Genome Res 17(1):42–49PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vošlajerová Bímová B, Macholán M, Baird SJ, Munclinger P, Dufková P, Laukaitis CM, Karn RC, Luzynski K, Tucker PK, Piálek J (2011) Reinforcement selection acting on the European house mouse hybrid zone. Mol Ecol 20:2403–2424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vrana PB, Guan XJ, Ingram RS, Tilghman SM (1998) Genomic imprinting is disrupted in interspecific Peromyscus hybrids. Nat Genet 20:362–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vyskocilová M, Prazanová G, Piálek J (2009) Polymorphism in hybrid male sterility in wild-derived Mus musculus musculus strains on proximal chromosome 17. Mamm Genome 20:83–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang LY, Luzynski K, Pool JE, Janousek V, Dufkova P, Vyskocilova MM, Teeter KC, Nachman MW, Munclinger P, Macholan M, Pialek J, Tucker PK (2011) Measures of linkage disequilibrium among neighbouring SNPs indicate asymmetries across the house mouse hybrid zone. Mol Ecol 20:2985–3000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. White MA, Steffy B, Wiltshire T, Payseur BA (2011) Genetic dissection of a key reproductive barrier between nascent species of house mice. Genetics 189:289–304PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Phifer-Rixey M, Bmhoff M, Nachman MW (in prep) Insights into divergence among house mouse subspecies inferred from transcriptome sequencingGoogle Scholar
  56. Yang H, Ding Y, Hutchins LN, Szatkiewicz J, Bell TA, Paigen BJ, Graber JH, de Villena FP, Churchill GA (2009) A customized and versatile high-density genotyping array for the mouse. Nat Methods 6:663–666PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yang H, Wang JR, Didion JP, Buus RJ, Bell TA, Welsh CE, Bonhomme F, Yu AH, Nachman MW, Pialek J, Tucker P, Boursot P, McMillan L, Churchill GA, de Villena FP (2011) Subspecific origin and haplotype diversity in the laboratory mouse. Nat Genet 43:648–655PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zechner U, Reule M, Orth A, Bonhomme F, Strack B, Guenet JL, Hameister H, Fundele R (1996) An X-chromosome linked locus contributes to abnormal placental development in mouse interspecific hybrids. Nat Genet 12:398–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • David H. Kass
    • 1
  • Václav Janoušek
    • 2
    • 3
  • Liuyang Wang
    • 4
  • Priscilla K. Tucker
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BiologyEastern Michigan UniversityYpsilantiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Zoology, Faculty of ScienceCharles University in PraguePrague 2Czech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Population BiologyInstitute of Vertebrate Biology, ASCRBrnoCzech Republic
  4. 4.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of ZoologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations