Abstract
Imprinted genes are defined by their parent-of-origin-specific monoallelic expression. Although the epigenetic mechanisms regulating imprinted gene expression have been widely studied, their functional importance is still unclear. Imprinted genes are associated with a number of physiologies, including placental function and foetal growth, energy homeostasis, and brain and behaviour. This review focuses on genomic imprinting in the brain and on two imprinted genes in particular, Nesp and paternal Grb10, which, when manipulated in animals, have been shown to influence adult behaviour. These two genes are of particular interest as they are expressed in discrete and overlapping neural regions, recognised as key “imprinting hot spots” in the brain. Furthermore, these two genes do not appear to influence placental function and/or maternal provisioning of offspring. Consequently, by understanding their behavioural function we may begin to shed light on the evolutionary significance of imprinted genes in the adult brain, independent of the recognised role in maternal care. In addition, we discuss the potential future directions of research investigating the function of these two genes and the behavioural role of imprinted genes more generally.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramowitz LK, Bartolomei MS (2012) Genomic imprinting: recognition and marking of imprinted loci. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22:72–78
Bartolomucci A, Possenti R, Mahata SK, Fischer-Colbrie R, Loh YP, Salton SR (2011) The extended granin family: structure, function, and biomedical implications. Endocr Rev 32:755–797
Bauer R, Ischia R, Marksteiner J, Kapeller I, Fischer-Colbrie R (1999) Localization of neuroendocrine secretory protein 55 messenger RNA in the rat brain. Neuroscience 91:685–694
Cassidy SB, Dykens E, Williams CA (2000) Prader–Willi and Angelman syndromes: sister imprinted disorders. Am J Med Genet 97:136–146
Champagne FA, Curley JP, Swaney WT, Hasen NS, Keverne EB (2009) Paternal influence on female behavior: the role of Peg3 in exploration, olfaction, and neuroendocrine regulation of maternal behavior of female mice. Behav Neurosci 123:469
Charalambous M, Cowley M, Geoghegan F, Smith FM, Radford EJ, Marlow BP, Graham CF, Hurst LD, Ward A (2010) Maternally-inherited Grb10 reduces placental size and efficiency. Dev Biol 337:1–8
Choi JD, Underkoffler LA, Wood AJ, Collins JN, Williams PT, Golden JA, Schuster EF Jr, Loomes KM, Oakey RJ (2005) A novel variant of Inpp 5f is imprinted in brain, and its expression is correlated with differential methylation of an internal CpG island. Mol Cell Biol 25:5514–5522
Curley JP, Barton S, Surani A, Keverne EB (2004) Coadaptation in mother and infant regulated by a paternally expressed imprinted gene. Proc Biol Sci 271:1303–1309
Davies W, Isles AR, Wilkinson LS (2005) Imprinted gene expression in the brain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:421–430
Davis JF, Krause EG, Melhorn SJ, Sakai RR, Benoit SC (2009) Dominant rats are natural risk takers and display increased motivation for food reward. Neuroscience 162:23–30
Ferguson-Smith AC (2011) Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nat Rev Genet 12:565–575
Fischer-Colbrie R, Eder S, Lovisetti-Scamihorn P, Becker A, Laslop A (2002) Neuroendocrine secretory protein 55. Ann N Y Acad Sci 971:317–322
Fowden AL, Sibley C, Reik W, Constancial M (2006) Imprinted genes, placental development and fetal growth. Horm Res 65:50–58
Francks C, Maegawa S, Lauren J, Abrahams BS, Velayos-Baeza A, Medland SE, Colella S, Groszer M, McAuley EZ, Caffrey TM, Timmusk T, Pruunsild P, Koppel I, Lind PA, Matsumoto-Itaba N, Nicod J, Xiong L, Joober R, Enard W, Krinsky B, Nanba E, Richardson AJ, Riley BP, Martin NG, Strittmatter SM, Moller HJ, Rujescu D, St Clair D, Muglia P, Roos JL, Fisher SE, Wade-Martins R, Rouleau GA, Stein JF, Karayiorgou M, Geschwind DH, Ragoussis J, Kendler KS, Airaksinen MS, Oshimura M, DeLisi LE, Monaco AP (2007) LRRTM1 on chromosome 2p12 is a maternally suppressed gene that is associated paternally with handedness and schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 12:1129–1139
Garfield AS, Cowley M, Smith FM, Moorwood K, Stewart-Cox JE, Gilroy K, Baker S, Xia J, Dalley JW, Hurst LD, Wilkinson LS, Isles AR, Ward A (2011) Distinct physiological and behavioural functions for parental alleles of imprinted Grb10. Nature 469:534–538
Gregg C, Zhang J, Weissbourd B, Luo S, Schroth GP, Haig D, Dulac C (2010) High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 329:643–648
Gutierrez-Marcos JF, Constância M, Burton GJ (2012) Maternal to offspring resource allocation in plants and mammals. Placenta 33(suppl 2):e3–e10
Haig D (2000) The kinship theory of genomic imprinting. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:9–32
Haig D, Graham C (1991) Genomic imprinting and the strange case of the insulin-like growth factor II receptor. Cell 64:1045
Holt LJ, Siddle K (2005) Grb10 and Grb14: enigmatic regulators of insulin action and more? Biochem J 388(Pt 2):393–406
Holt LJ, Lyons RJ, Ryan AS, Beale SM, Ward A, Cooney GJ, Daly RJ (2009) Dual ablation of Grb10 and Grb14 in mice reveals their combined role in regulation of insulin signaling and glucose homeostasis. Mol Endocrinol 23:1406–1414
Humby T, Wilkinson L, Dawson G (2005) Assaying aspects of attention and impulse control in mice using the 5‐choice serial reaction time task. Curr Protoc Neurosci Chap. 8, Unit 8.5H. doi:10.1002/0471142301.ns0805hs31
Humby T, Eddy JB, Good MA, Reichelt AC, Wilkinson LS (2013) A novel translational assay of response inhibition and impulsivity: effects of prefrontal cortex lesions, drugs used in ADHD, and serotonin 2C receptor antagonism. Neuropsychopharmacology. doi:10.1038/npp.2013.112
Isles AR, Holland AJ (2005) Imprinted genes and mother–offspring interactions. Early Hum Dev 81:73–77
Isles AR, Baum MJ, Ma D, Keverne EB, Allen ND (2001) Urinary odour preferences in mice. Nature 409:783–784
Isles AR, Humby T, Wilkinson LS (2003) Measuring impulsivity in mice using a novel operant delayed reinforcement task: effects of behavioural manipulations and d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 170:376–382
Isles AR, Davies W, Wilkinson LS (2006) Genomic imprinting and the social brain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361:2229–2237
John RM, Lefebvre L (2011) Developmental regulation of somatic imprints. Differentiation 81:270–280
Kelsey G, Feil R (2013) New insights into establishment and maintenance of DNA methylation imprints in mammals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368:20110336
Keverne EB (1997) Genomic imprinting in the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7:463–468
Lefebvre L, Viville S, Barton SC, Ishino F, Keverne EB, Surani MA (1998) Abnormal maternal behaviour and growth retardation associated with loss of the imprinted gene Mest. Nat Genet 20:163–169
Lovisetti-Scamihorn P, Fischer-Colbrie R, Leitner B, Scherzer G, Winkler H (1999) Relative amounts and molecular forms of NESP55 in various bovine tissues. Brain Res 829:99–106
McNamara GI, Isles AR (2013) Dosage sensitivity of imprinted genes expressed in the brain: 15q11–q13 and neuropsychiatric illness. Biochem Soc Trans 41:721–726
Muscatelli F, Abrous DN, Massacrier A, Boccaccio I, Le Moal M, Cau P, Cremer H (2000) Disruption of the mouse Necdin gene results in hypothalamic and behavioral alterations reminiscent of the human Prader–Willi syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 9:3101–3110
Plagge A, Gordon E, Dean W, Boiani R, Cinti S, Peters J, Kelsey G (2004) The imprinted signaling protein XLαs is required for postnatal adaptation to feeding. Nat Genet 36:818–826
Plagge A, Isles AR, Gordon E, Humby T, Dean W, Gritsch S, Fischer-Colbrie R, Wilkinson LS, Kelsey G (2005) Imprinted Nesp55 influences behavioral reactivity to novel environments. Mol Cell Biol 25:3019–3026
Relkovic D, Doe CM, Humby T, Johnstone KA, Resnick JL, Holland AJ, Hagan JJ, Wilkinson LS, Isles AR (2010) Behavioural and cognitive abnormalities in an imprinting centre deletion mouse model for Prader–Willi syndrome. Eur J Neurosci 31:156–164
Rougeulle C, Glatt H, Lalande M (1997) The Angelman syndrome candidate gene, UBE3A/E6-AP, is imprinted in brain. Nat Genet 17:14–15
Sanz LA, Chamberlain S, Sabourin J-C, Henckel A, Magnuson T, Hugnot J-P, Feil R, Arnaud P (2008) A mono-allelic bivalent chromatin domain controls tissue-specific imprinting at Grb10. EMBO J 27:2523–2532
Smallwood SA, Tomizawa S, Krueger F, Ruf N, Carli N, Segonds-Pichon A, Sato S, Hata K, Andrews SR, Kelsey G (2011) Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Nat Genet 43:811–814
Smith FM, Garfield AS, Ward A (2006) Regulation of growth and metabolism by imprinted genes. Cytogenet Genome Res 113:279–291
Swaney WT, Curley JP, Champagne FA, Keverne EB (2007) Genomic imprinting mediates sexual experience-dependent olfactory learning in male mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:6084–6089
Wang F, Zhu J, Zhu H, Zhang Q, Lin Z, Hu H (2011) Bidirectional control of social hierarchy by synaptic efficacy in medial prefrontal cortex. Science 334:693–697
Wilkinson LS, Davies W, Isles AR (2007) Genomic imprinting effects on brain development and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:832–843
Wolf JB, Hager R (2006) A maternal–offspring coadaptation theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting. PLoS Biol 4:e380
Xie W, Barr CL, Kim A, Yue F, Lee AY, Eubanks J, Dempster EL, Ren B (2012) Base-resolution analyses of sequence and parent-of-origin dependent DNA methylation in the mouse genome. Cell 148:816–831
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dent, C.L., Isles, A.R. Brain-expressed imprinted genes and adult behaviour: the example of Nesp and Grb10 . Mamm Genome 25, 87–93 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-013-9472-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-013-9472-0