Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Molecular characterization of the translocation breakpoints in the Down syndrome mouse model Ts65Dn

  • Published:
Mammalian Genome Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 November 2011

Abstract

Ts65Dn is a mouse model of Down syndrome: a syndrome that results from chromosome (Chr) 21 trisomy and is associated with congenital defects, cognitive impairment, and ultimately Alzheimer’s disease. Ts65Dn mice have segmental trisomy for distal mouse Chr 16, a region sharing conserved synteny with human Chr 21. As a result, this strain harbors three copies of over half of the human Chr 21 orthologs. The trisomic segment of Chr 16 is present as a translocation chromosome (Mmu1716), with breakpoints that have not been defined previously. To molecularly characterize the Chrs 16 and 17 breakpoints on the translocation chromosome in Ts65Dn mice, we used a selective enrichment and high-throughput paired-end sequencing approach. Analysis of paired-end reads flanking the Chr 16, Chr 17 junction on Mmu1716 and de novo assembly of the reads directly spanning the junction provided the precise locations of the Chrs 16 and 17 breakpoints at 84,351,351 and 9,426,822 bp, respectively. These data provide the basis for low-cost, highly efficient genotyping of Ts65Dn mice. More importantly, these data provide, for the first time, complete characterization of gene dosage in Ts65Dn mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akeson EC, Davisson MT (2001) Mitotic chromosome preparations from mouse cells for karyotyping. Curr Protoc Hum Genet Chapter 4: Unit 4.10

  • Akeson EC, Lambert JP, Narayanswami S, Gardiner K, Bechtel LJ, Davisson MT (2001) Ts65Dn-localization of the translocation breakpoint and trisomic gene content in a mouse model for Down syndrome. Cytogenet Cell Genet 93:270–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa AC, Stasko MR, Schmidt C, Davisson MT (2010) Behavioral validation of the Ts65Dn mouse model for Down syndrome of a genetic background free of the retinal degeneration mutation Pde6b(rd1). Behav Brain Res 206:52–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ascenzo M, Meacham C, Kitzman J, Middle C, Knight J, Winer R, Kukricar M, Richmond T, Albert TJ, Czechanski A, Donahue LR, Affourtit J, Jeddeloh JA, Reinholdt L (2009) Mutation discovery in the mouse using genetically guided array capture and resequencing. Mamm Genome 20:424–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davisson MT, Schmidt C, Reeves RH, Irving NG, Akeson EC, Harris BS, Bronson RT (1993) Segmental trisomy as a mouse model for Down syndrome. Prog Clin Biol Res 384:117–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davisson M, Akeson E, Schmidt C, Harris B, Farley J, Handel MA (2007) Impact of trisomy on fertility and meiosis in male mice. Hum Reprod 22:468–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges E, Rooks M, Xuan Z, Bhattacharjee A, Benjamin Gordon D, Brizuela L, Richard McCombie W, Hannon GJ (2009) Hybrid selection of discrete genomic intervals on custom-designed microarrays for massively parallel sequencing. Nat Protoc 4:960–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kabotyanski EB, Gomelsky L, Han JO, Stamato TD, Roth DB (1998) Double-strand break repair in Ku86- and XRCC4-deficient cells. Nucleic Acids Res 26:5333–5342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kahlem P, Sultan M, Herwig R, Steinfath M, Balzereit D, Eppens B, Saran NG, Pletcher MT, South ST, Stetten G, Lehrach H, Reeves RH, Yaspo ML (2004) Transcript level alterations reflect gene dosage effects across multiple tissues in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Genome Res 14:1258–1267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Yu T, Morishima M, Pao A, LaDuca J, Conroy J, Nowak N, Matsui S, Shiraishi I, Yu YE (2007) Duplication of the entire 22.9 Mb human chromosome 21 syntenic region on mouse chromosome 16 causes cardiovascular and gastrointestinal abnormalities. Hum Mol Genet 16:1359–1366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu DP, Schmidt C, Billings T, Davisson MT (2003) Quantitative PCR genotyping assay for the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome. Biotechniques 35:1170–1174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi H, Duvall N, Cherry SM, Reeves RH, Roper RJ (2010) PCR prescreen for genotyping the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome. Biotechniques 48:35–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore CS, Lee JS, Birren B, Stetten G, Baxter LL, Reeves RH (1999) Integration of cytogenetic with recombinational and physical maps of mouse chromosome 16. Genomics 59:1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves RH, Irving NG, Moran TH, Wohn A, Kitt C, Sisodia SS, Schmidt C, Bronson RT, Davisson MT (1995) A mouse model for Down syndrome exhibits learning and behaviour deficits. Nat Genet 11:177–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reinholdt LG, Czechanski A, Kamdar S, King BL, Sun F, Handel MA (2009) Meiotic behavior of aneuploid chromatin in mouse models of Down syndrome. Chromosoma 118:723–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby PW, Dieckmann M, Rhodes C, Berg P (1977) Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. J Mol Biol 113:237–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell WL, Bangham JW, Russell LB (1998) Differential response of mouse male germ-cell stages to radiation-induced specific-locus and dominant mutations. Genetics 148:1567–1578

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talkowski ME, Ernst C, Heilbut A, Chiang C, Hanscom C, Lindgren A, Kirby A, Liu S, Muddukrishna B, Ohsumi TK, Shen Y, Borowsky M, Daly MJ, Morton CC, Gusella JF (2011) Next-generation sequencing strategies enable routine detection of balanced chromosome rearrangements for clinical diagnostics and genetic research. Am J Hum Genet 88:469–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilella AJ, Severin J, Ureta-Vidal A, Heng L, Durbin R, Birney E (2009) EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: Complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. Genome Res 19:327–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the High Throughput Sequencing and Genome Sciences cores at The Jackson Laboratory for their excellent services and advice. The Transgenic Genotyping core at The Jackson Laboratory provided DNA samples and genotyping data that were critical for validation. This work was supported by funding from NICHD CYTO-01, a Cancer Center Core Grant at The Jackson Laboratory (CA34196), and NIH DE021034 (RJR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura G. Reinholdt.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9367-x

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

335_2011_9357_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx

Supplementary Table 1 Ensembl and NCBI gene annotations and Ensembl-predicted human orthologs for Mmu17, from 0 to 9,426,822 bp. Ensembl prediction of orthology is based on maximum likelihood phylogenetic gene trees (Vilella et al. 2009). Orthology information is not available (N/A) from Ensembl for noncoding RNA genes and for genes that are predicted by NCBI (RefSeq) only. Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 92 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reinholdt, L.G., Ding, Y., Gilbert, G.T. et al. Molecular characterization of the translocation breakpoints in the Down syndrome mouse model Ts65Dn. Mamm Genome 22, 685–691 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9357-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9357-z

Keywords

Navigation