Abstract
Congenic strains continue to be a fundamental resource for dissecting the genetic basis of complex traits. Traditionally, genetic variants (QTLs) that account for phenotypic variation in a panel of congenic strains are sought first by comparing phenotypes for each strain to the host (reference) strain, and then by examining the results to identify a common chromosome segment that provides the best match between genotype and phenotype across the panel. However, this “common-segment” method has significant limitations, including the subjective nature of the genetic model and an inability to deal formally with strain phenotypes that do not fit the model. We propose an alternative that we call “sequential” analysis and that is based on a unique principle of QTL analysis where each strain, corresponding to a single genotype, is tested individually for QTL effects rather than testing the congenic panel collectively for common effects across heterogeneous backgrounds. A minimum spanning tree, based on principles of graph theory, is used to determine the optimal sequence of strain comparisons. For two traits in two panels of congenic strains in mice, we compared results for the sequential method with the common-segment method as well as with two standard methods of QTL analysis, namely, interval mapping and multiple linear regression. The general utility of the sequential method was demonstrated with analysis of five additional traits in congenic panels from mice and rats. Sequential analysis rigorously resolved phenotypic heterogeneity among strains in the congenic panels and found QTLs that other methods failed to detect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abiola O, Angel JM, Avner P, Bachmanov AA, Belknap JK et al (2003) The nature and identification of quantitative trait loci: a community’s view. Nat Rev Genet 4:911–916
Altschuler D, Daly MJ, Lander ES (2008) Genetic mapping in human disease. Science 322:881–888
Belknap JK (2003) Chromosome substitution strains: some quantitative considerations for genome scans and fine mapping. Mamm Genome 14:723–732
Brem RB, Kruglyak L (2005) The landscape of genetic complexity across 5, 700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:1572–1577
Broman KW, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill GA (2003) R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19:889–890
Churchill GA, Airey DC, Allayee H, Angel JM, Attie AD et al (2004) The collaborative cross, a community resource for the analysis of complex traits. Nat Genet 36:1133–1137
Cilila GT, Garrett MR, Lee SJ, Liu J, Rapp JP (2001) High-resolution mapping of the blood pressure QTL on chromosome 7 using Dahl rat congenic strains. Genomics 72:51–60
Corman T, Leiseson C, Rivest R, Stein C (2003) Introduction to algorithms, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Doerge RW, Churchill GA (1996) Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics 142:285–294
Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R (2004) Least angle regression. Ann Stats 32:407–499
Fawcett GL, Roseman CC, Jarvis JP, Wang B, Wolf JB et al (2008) Genetic architecture of adiposity and organ weight using combined generation QTL analysis. Obesity 16:1861–1868
Flaherty L (1981) Congenic strains. In: the mouse in biomedical research, Vol. 1. History, genetics, and wild mice. Academic Press, New York, pp 215–222
Flint J, Mott R (2008) Applying mouse complex-trait resources to behavioural genetics. Nature 456:724–727
Fridman E, Pleban T, Zamir D (2000) A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an invertase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:4718–4723
Glazier AM, Nadeau JH, Aitman TJ (2002) Finding genes that underlie complex traits. Science 298:2345–2349
Gregorová S, Divina P, Storchova R, Trachtulec Z, Fotopulosova V et al (2008) Mouse consomic strains: exploiting genetic divergence between Mus m. musculus and Mus m. domesticus subspecies. Genome Res 18:509–515
Hirschhorn JN (2009) Genomewide association studies—illuminating biologic pathways. N Engl J Med 360:1699–1701
Huberle A, Beyeen AD, Ockinger J, Ayturan M, Jagodic M et al (2009) Advanced intercross line mapping suggests that ncf1 (ean6) regulates severity in an animal model of Guillain-Barre syndrome. J Immunol 182:4432–4438
Iakoubova OA, Olsson CL, Dains KM, Ross DA, Andalibi A et al (2001) Genome-tagged mice (GTM): two sets of genome-wide congenic strains. Genomics 74:89–104
Irwin MR (1939) A genetic analysis of species differences in Columbidae. Genetics 24:709–721
Kenney-Hunt JP, Wang B, Norgard EA, Fawcett G, Falk D et al (2008) Pleiotropic patterns of quantitative trait loci for seventy murine skeletal traits. Genetics 178:2275–2288
Kroymann J, Mitchell-Olds T (2005) Epistasis and balanced polymorphism influencing complex trait variation. Nature 435:95–98
Kruglyak L (2008) The road to genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet 9:314–318
Lander ES, Botstein D (1989) Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185–199
Lander ES, Schork NJ (1994) Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 30:2037–2048
Lauwerys BR, Wakeland EK (2005) Genetics of lupus nephritis. Lupus 14:2–12
Legare ME, Frankel WN (2000) Multiple seizure susceptibility genes on chromosome 7 in SWXL-4 congenic mouse strains. Genomics 70:62–65
Legare ME, Bartlett FS, Frankel WN (2000) A major effect QTL determined by multiple genes in epileptic EL mice. Genome Res 10:42–48
Manolio TA, Brooks LD, Collins FS (2008) A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease. J Clin Invest 118:1590–1605
Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA et al (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461:747–753
Markel P, Shu P, Ebeling C, Carlson GA, Nagle DL et al (1997) Theoretical and empirical issues for marker-assisted breeding of congenic mouse strains. Nat Genet 17:280–284
Matin A, Collin GB, Asada Y, Varnum D, Nadeau JH (1999) Susceptibility to testicular germ-cell tumors in a 129.MOLF-Chr 19 chromosome substitution strain. Nat Genet 23:237–240
Millward CA, Burrage LC, Shao H, Sinasac DS, Kawasoe JH et al (2009) Genetic factors for resistance to diet-induced obesity and associated metabolic traits on mouse chromosome 17. Mamm Genome 20:71–82
Morel L, Blenman KR, Croker BP, Wakeland EK (2001) The major murine systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility locus, Sle1, is a cluster of functionally related genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:1787–1792
Moreno C, Kaldunski ML, Wang T, Roman RJ, Greene AS et al (2007) Multiple blood pressure loci on rat chromosome 13 attenuate development of hypertension in the Dahl S hypertensive rat. Physiol Genomics 31:228–235
Nadeau JH, Singer JB, Matin A, Lander ES (2000) Analyzing complex genetic traits with chromosome substitution strains. Nat Genet 24:221–225
Nathan BM, Hodges CA, Supelak PJ, Burrage LC, Nadeau JH et al (2006) A quantitative trait locus on chromosome 6 regulates the onset of puberty in mice. Endocrinology 147:5132–5138
Pomp D, Nehrenberg D, Estrada-Smith D (2008) Complex genetics of obesity in mouse models. Annu Rev Nutr 28:331–435
Shao H, Burrage LC, Sinasac DS, Hill AE, Ernest SR et al (2008) Genetic architecture of complex traits: large phenotypic effects and pervasive epistasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19910–19914
Shultz KL, Donahue LR, Bouxsein ML, Baylink DJ, Rosen CJ et al (2003) Congenic strains of mice for verification and genetic decomposition of quantitative trait loci for femoral bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 18:175–185
Silver LM (1995) Mouse genetics: concepts and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Singer JB, Hill AE, Burrage LC, Olszens KR, Song J et al (2004) Genetic dissection of complex traits with chromosome substitution strains of mice. Science 304:445–448
Sinha H, David L, Pascon RC, Clauder-Munster S, Krishnakumar S et al (2008) Sequential elimination of major-effect contributors identifies additional quantitative trait loci conditioning high-temperature growth in yeast. Genetics 180:1661–1670
Snell GD (1948) Methods for the study of histocompatibility genes. J Genet 49:87–108
Snell GD (1958) Histocompatibility genes of the mouse. I. Demonstration of weak histocompatibility differences by immunization and controlled tumour dosage. J Natl Cancer Inst 20:787–824
Snell GS (1978) Congenic resistant strains of mice. In: Morse HC (ed) Origins of inbred mice. Academic Press, New York, pp 119–155
Steinmetz LM, Sinha H, Richards DR, Spiegelman JI, Oefner PJ et al (2002) Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Nature 416:326–330
Takada T, Mita A, Maeno A, Sakai T, Shitara H et al (2008) Mouse inter-subspecific consomic strains for genetic dissection of quantitative complex traits. Genome Res 18:500–508
Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc B 58:267–288
Yamanouchi J, Rainbow D, Serra P, Howlett S, Hunter K et al (2007) Interleukin-2 gene variation impairs regulatory T cell function and causes autoimmunity. Nat Genet 39:329–337
Youngren KK, Nadeau JH, Matin A (2003) Testicular cancer susceptibility in the 129.MOLF-Chr19 mouse strain: additive effects, gene interactions and epigenetic modifications. Hum Mol Genet 12:389–398
Zhu J, Zhang B, Schadt EE (2008) A systems biology approach to drug discovery. Adv Genet 60:603–635
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Richard J. Roman, Andrew S. Greene, Mary L. Kaldunski, and Jozef Lazar for their contributions to the rat studies. This work was supported in part by NIH grants CA75056, CA116867, and RR12305 to JHN, grants HL54998 and HL82798 to AJC and HJJ, and grant HD048960 to MRP. DSS was supported by a fellowship from the Canadian Diabetes Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shao, H., Sinasac, D.S., Burrage, L.C. et al. Analyzing complex traits with congenic strains. Mamm Genome 21, 276–286 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-010-9267-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-010-9267-5