Skip to main content
Log in

Use of an exon-trapping vector for the evaluation of splice-site mutations

  • Published:
Mammalian Genome Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prediction of the effects of splice-site variations by sequence analysis is difficult. In this study we provide the means for a rapid evaluation of the potential for splice-site mutations to interfere with RNA processing. The system may be useful in reverse genetics or mapping studies when isolation and characterization of mRNA is arduous or not possible. In the assay we cloned wild-type and mutant sequences of murine splice-site mutations into an exon-trapping vector and characterized splicing of both recombinant transcripts in a transient cell culture system. Results from this artificial assay were compared with in vivo data from the respective mouse models. We found that the exon-trapping system allows one to confidently predict whether a splice-site variation is going to have a splicing effect in vivo, but the system does not always reflect in vivo splicing in detail. In summary, the exon-trapping system is a reliable and easy-to-use tool for a first evaluation of splice effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreadis A, Nisson PE, Kosik KS, Watkins PC (1993) The exon trapping assay partly discriminates against alternatively spliced exons. Nucleic Acids Res 21:2217–2221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Augustin M, Sedlmeier R, Peters T, Huffstadt U, Kochmann E, et al. (2005) Efficient and fast targeted production of murine models based on ENU mutagenesis. Mamm Genome 16:405–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berget SM (1995) Exon recognition in vertebrate splicing. J Biol Chem 270:2411–2414

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burn TC, Connors TD, Klinger KW, Landes GM (1995) Increased exon-trapping efficiency through modifications to the pSPL3 splicing vector. Gene 161:183–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Church DM, Stotler CJ, Rutter JL, Murrell JR, Trofatter JA, et al. (1994) Isolation of genes from complex sources of mammalian genomic DNA using exon amplification. Nat Genet 6:98–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordes SP (2005) N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis: boarding the mouse mutant express. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69:426–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faustino NA, Cooper TA (2003) Pre-mRNA splicing and human disease. Genes Dev 17:419–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris NL, Senapathy P (1990) Distribution and consensus of branch point signals in eukaryotic genes: a computerized statistical analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 18:3015–3019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyne GF, Goodnow CC (2006) The use of genomewide ENU mutagenesis screens to unravel complex mammalian traits: identifying genes that regulate organ-specific and systemic autoimmunity. Immunol Rev 210:27–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski MM, Wang X, Lu L, Miller DR, Rinchik EM, et al. (2005) The Tennessee Mouse Genome Consortium: identification of ocular mutants. Vis Neurosci 22:595–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig L, Janssen JW, Bartram CR (1995) Exon trap analysis of a NF1 splice-site mutation in a chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patient. Leukemia 9:922–924

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michaud EJ, Culiat CT, Klebig ML, Barker PE, Cain KT, et al. (2005) Efficient gene-driven germ-line point mutagenesis of C57BL/6J mice. BMC Genomics 6:164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett RA, Grabowski PJ, Konarska MM, Seiler S, Sharp PA (1986) Splicing of messenger RNA precursors. Annu Rev Biochem 55:1119–1150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed R (1996) Initial splice-site recognition and pairing during pre-mRNA splicing. Curr Opin Genet Dev 6:215–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reutrakul S, Dumitrescu A, Macchia PE, Moll GW, Vierhapper H, et al. (2002) Complete thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG) deficiency in two families without mutations in coding or promoter regions of the TBG genes: in vitro demonstration of exon skipping. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1045–1051

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Will CL, Luhrmann R (2001) Spliceosomal UsnRNP biogenesis, structure and function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13:290–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson L, Ching YH, Farias M, Hartford SA, Howell G, et al. (2005) Random mutagenesis of proximal mouse chromosome 5 uncovers predominantly embryonic lethal mutations. Genome Res 15:1095–1105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Thomas Peters and Martin Augustin for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported in part by the European Genomics Initiative on Disorders of plasma membrane Amino acid Transporters (EuGINDAT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Sedlmeier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, B., Koppius, A. & Sedlmeier, R. Use of an exon-trapping vector for the evaluation of splice-site mutations. Mamm Genome 18, 670–676 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-007-9047-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-007-9047-z

Keywords

Navigation