Abstract
Mice are important models for biomedical research because of the possibility of standardizing genetic background and environmental conditions, which both affect phenotypic variability. Inbred mouse strains as well as F1 hybrid mice are routinely used as genetically defined animal models; however, only a few studies investigated the variance of phenotypic parameters in inbred versus F1 hybrid mice and the potential interference of the genetic background with different housing conditions. Thus, we analyzed the ranges of clinical chemical and hematologic parameters in C3H and C57BL/6 inbred mice and their reciprocal F1 hybrids (B6C3F1, C3B6F1) in two different mouse facilities. Two thirds of the blood parameters examined in the same strain differed between the facilities for both the inbred strains and the F1 hybrid lines. The relation of the values between inbred and F1 hybrid mice was also affected by the facility. The variance of blood parameters in F1 hybrid mice compared with their parental inbred strains was inconsistent in one facility but generally smaller in the other facility. A subsequent study of F1 hybrid animals derived from the parental strains C3H and BALB/c, which was done in the latter housing unit, detected no general difference in the variance of blood parameters between F1 hybrid and inbred mice. Our study clearly demonstrates the possibility of major interactions between genotype and environment regarding the variance of clinical chemical and hematologic parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown SD, Balling R (2001) Systematic approaches to mouse mutagenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 11: 268–273
Champy MF, Selloum M, Piard L, Zeitler V, Caradec C, et al. (2004) Mouse functional genomics requires standardization of mouse handling and housing conditions. Mamm Genome 15: 768–783
Greiling H, Gressner AM (1995) Lehrbuch der Klinischen Chemie und Pathobiochemie (Stuttgart: Schattauer)
Hough TA, Nolan PM, Tsipouri V, Toye AA, Gray IC, et al. (2002) Novel phenotypes identified by plasma biochemical screening in the mouse. Mamm Genome 13: 595–602
Hrabé de Angelis MH, Flaswinkel H, Fuchs H, Rathkolb B, Soewarto D, et al. (2000) Genome-wide, large-scale production of mutant mice by ENU mutagenesis. Nat Genet 25: 444–447
Kile BT, Mason-Garrison CL, Justice MJ (2003) Sex and strain-related differences in the peripheral blood cell values of inbred mouse strains. Mamm Genome 14: 81–85
Loeb WF, Quimby FW (1999) The clinical chemistry of laboratory animals (Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis)
Olsson IA, Dahlborn K (2002) Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: a review of “environmental enrichment.” Lab Anim 36: 243–270
Paigen K, Eppig JT (2000) A mouse phenome project. Mamm Genome 11: 715–17
Rathkolb B, Decker T, Fuchs E, Soewarto D, Fella C, et al. (2000a) The clinical-chemical screen in the Munich ENU Mouse Mutagenesis Project: screening for clinically relevant phenotypes. Mamm Genome 11: 543–546
Rathkolb B, Fuchs E, Kolb HJ, Renner-Muller I, Krebs O, et al. (2000b) Large-scale N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis of mice—from phenotypes to genes. Exp Physiol 85: 635–644
Russ A, Stumm G, Augustin M, Sedlmeier R, Wattler S, et al. (2002) Random mutagenesis in the mouse as a tool in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 7: 1175–1183
Van Zutphen LFM, Baumans V, Beynen AC (2001) Principles of laboratory animal science (London: Elsevier)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the German Human Genome Project (DHGP) (BR) and the National Genome Research Network (NGFN) (MK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klempt, M., Rathkolb, B., Fuchs, E. et al. Genotype-specific environmental impact on the variance of blood values in inbred and F1 hybrid mice. Mamm Genome 17, 93–102 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-005-0119-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-005-0119-7