Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arable weed seeds as indicators of regional cereal provenance: a case study from Iron Age and Roman central-southern Britain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability to provenance crop remains from archaeological sites remains an outstanding research question in archaeology. Archaeobotanists have previously identified the movement of cereals on the basis of regional variations in the presence of cereal grain, chaff and weed seeds (the consumer–producer debate), and weed seeds indicative of certain soil types, principally at Danebury hillfort. Whilst the former approach has been heavily criticised over the last decade, the qualitative methods of the latter have not been evaluated. The first interregional trade in cereals in Britain is currently dated to the Iron Age hillfort societies of the mid 1st millennium bc. Several centuries later, the development of urban settlements in the Late Iron Age and Roman period resulted in populations reliant on food which was produced elsewhere. Using the case study of central-southern Britain, centred on the oppidum (large fortified settlement) and civitas capital of Silchester, this paper presents the first regional quantitative analysis of arable weed seeds in order to identify the origin of the cereals consumed there. Analysis of the weed seeds which were present with the fine sieve by-products of the glume wheat Triticum spelta (spelt) shows that the weed floras of samples from diverse geological areas can be separated on the basis of the soil requirements of individual taxa. A preliminary finding is that, rather than being supplied with cereals from the wider landscape of the chalk region of the Hampshire Downs, the crops were grown close to Late Iron Age Silchester. The method presented here requires further high quality samples to evaluate this conclusion and other instances of cereal movement in the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrete GS, Mattingly DJ (1999) Feeding the city: the organization, operation, and scale of the supply system for Rome. In: Potter D, Mattingly D (eds) Life, death, and entertainment in the Roman Empire. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 171–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendrey R, Hayes TE, Palmer MR (2009) Patterns of Iron Age horse supply: an analysis of strontium isotope ratios in teeth. Archaeometry 51:140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birbeck V (2000) Archaeological investigations on the A34 Newbury Bypass, Berkshire/Hampshire, 1991–1997: Technical reports. Wessex Archaeology, Salisbury, pp 47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaard A (2004) Neolithic farming in central Europe: an archaeobotanical study of crop husbandry practices. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaard A (2011) Plant use and crop husbandry in an early Neolithic village: Vaihingen an der Enz, Baden-Württemberg. Habelt, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaard A, Jones G, Charles M, Hodgson J (2001) On the archaeobotanical inference of crop sowing time using the FIBS method. J Archaeol Sci 28:1,171–1,183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaard A, Henton E, Evans J, Twiss K, Charles M, Vaiglova P, Russell N (2014) Locating land use at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey: the implications of 87Sr/86Sr signatures in plants and sheep tooth sequences. Archaeometry 56:860–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaard A, Hodgson J, Nitsch E et al (2016) Combining functional weed ecology and crop stable isotope ratios to identify cultivation intensity: a comparison of cereal production regimes in Haute Provence, France and Asturias, Spain. Veget Hist Archaeobot 25:57–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth P, Dodd A, Robinson M, Smith A (2007) The Thames through time: the archaeology of the gravel terraces of the upper and middle Thames: the early historical period, ad 1–1000. Oxford University School of Archaeology, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman A, Wilson A (2013) Introduction: quantifying Roman agriculture. In: Bowman A, Wilson A (eds) The Roman agricultural economy: organization, investment, and production. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Branch N, Green C (2004) The environmental history of Surrey. In: Cotton J, Crocker G, Graham A (eds) Aspects of archaeology and history in Surrey: towards a research framework for the county. Surrey Archaeological Society, Guildford, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewis A, Bowman P, Rose F (1996) The flora of Hampshire. Harley Books, Colchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G (2000a) Plant utilization: the evidence from charred plant remains. In: Cunliffe B (ed) The Danebury environs programme: the prehistory of a Wessex landscape. Institute of Archaeology, Oxford, pp 45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G (2000b) The charred plant remains. In: Cunliffe B, Poole C (ed) The Danebury environs programme: the prehistory of a Wessex landscape. vol 2, part 3: Suddern Farm, Middle Wallop, Hants, 1991 and 1996. Institute of Archaeology, Oxford, pp 193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G (2008a) Plant utilization in the countryside around Danebury: a Roman perspective. In: Cunliffe B (ed) The Danebury environs Roman Programme: a Wessex landscape in the Roman era, vol 1. Overview, English Heritage and Oxford School of Archaeology, Oxford, pp 53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G (2008b) Charred plant remains. In: Cunliffe B (ed) The Danebury environs Roman programme: a Wessex landscape during the Roman era, vol 2, part 3: Fullerton, Hants, 2000 and 2001. English Heritage and Oxford University School of Archaeology, Oxford, pp 161–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G (2008c) Plant remains. In: Cunliffe B (ed) The Danebury environs Roman programme: a Wessex landscape during the Roman era, vol 2, part 2: Grateley South, Grateley, Hants, 1998 and 1999. English Heritage and Oxford University School of Archaeology, Oxford, pp 166–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G (2008d) Charred and mineralized plant remains. In: Cunliffe B (ed) The Danebury environs Roman programme: a Wessex landscape during the Roman era, vol 2, part 1: Houghton Down, Longstock, Hants, 1997. English Heritage and Oxford University School of Archaeology, Oxford, pp 146–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G (2008e) Plant remains. In: Cunliffe B (ed) The Danebury environs Roman programme: a Wessex landscape during the Roman era, vol 2, part 5: Rowbury Farm, Wherwell, Hants, 2003. English Heritage and Oxford University School of Archaeology, Oxford, pp 146–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers WJ (1991) The carbonised and mineralised plant remains. In: Bellamy P (ed) Investigations of the prehistoric landscape along the route of the A303. Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club and Archaeological Society, vol 47, pp 36–41

  • Carruthers W (1995) Plant remains. In: Fasham P, Keevil G, Coe D, Newman R (eds) Brighton Hill South (Hatch Warren): an Iron Age farmstead and deserted medieval village in Hampshire. Trust for Wessex Archaeology, Salisbury, pp 56–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers W (2010) Charred and waterlogged plant remains. In: Framework, Archaeology (eds) Landscape evolution in the Middle Thames Valley: Heathrow Terminal 5 excavations, vol 2. CD Rom. Framework Archaeology, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers W (2011) Charred and mineralised plant remains. In: Ford B, Teague S, Biddulph E (eds) Winchester—a city in the making: archaeological excavations between 2002 and 2007 on the sites of Northgate House, Staple Gardens and the former Winchester Library, Jewry St. (Oxford Archaeology Monograph 12) Oxbow, Oxford, pp 363–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles M (1998) Fodder from dung: the recognition and interpretation of dung-derived plant material from archaeological sites. Environ Archaeol 1:111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles S, Lowe J, Ford S (2011) Excavation of a Roman enclosure at Park Prewett Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire. Proc Hampsh Field Club Archaeol Soc 66:39–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley M (2005) The flora of Berkshire. Brambley Books, Harpenden

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton J (2000) Coins and power in Late Iron Age Britain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe B (1984) Danebury: an Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire. Vol 1: the excavations 1969–1978: the site. CBA Research Report No 52a, vol 1. CBA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe B (2012) Calleva in context. In: Fulford M (ed) Silchester and the study of Romano-British urbanism. (Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series Number 90) Journal of Roman Archaeology, Portsmouth, Rhode Island, pp 15–21

  • Cunliffe B, Poole C (2000) The Danebury environs programme: the prehistory of a Wessex landscape, vol1. Introduction. English Heritage and Oxford University School of Archaeology, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe B, Poole C (2008) The Danebury Environs Roman programme: a Wessex landscape during the Roman era, vol 1. Overview. English Heritage and Oxford University School of Archaeology, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis A (2004) The plant remains. In: Dunwoodie L (ed) Pre-Boudican and later activity on the site of the Forum. (Museum of London Archaeology Service, Archaeology Studies Series 13). MOLAS, London, pp 54–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis O (2013) Re-interpreting the Danebury assemblage: houses, households, and community. Proc Prehist Soc 79:353–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derreumaux M, Lepetz S (2008) Food supply at two successive military settlements in Arras (France): an archaeobotanical and archaeozoological approach. In: Stallibrass S, Thomas R (eds) Feeding the Roman army: the archaeology of production and supply in NW Europe. Oxbow, Oxford, pp 52–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ede J (2000) Charred plant remains from Bagnor Road. In: Birbeck V (ed) Archaeological investigations on the A34 Newbury Bypass, Berkshire/Hampshire, 1991–1997: Technical reports. Wessex Archaeology, Salisbury, pp 47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot S, Bendrey R, Whitlam J, Rauf Aziz K, Evans J (2015) Preliminary ethnoarchaeological research on modern animal husbandry in Bestansur, Iraqi Kurdistan: Integrating animal, plant and environmental data. Environ Archaeol 20:283–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdkamp P (2008) Grain market intervention in the Roman world. In: Alston R, van Nijf OM (eds) Feeding the ancient Greek city. Peeters, Leuven, pp 109–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdkamp P (2012) A forum on trade—the grain trade in the Roman world. In: Scheidl W (ed) The Cambridge companion to the Roman economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 304–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn A, Austin P (2001) Archaeobotanical evidence. In: Barber A, Holbrook N (authors) A Romano-British settlement to the rear of Denchworth road, Wantage, Oxfordshire: evaluation and excavation in 1996 and 1998. Oxoniensia 66:325–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentino G, Caracuta V, Casiello G, Longobardi F, Sacco A (2012) Studying ancient crop provenance: implications from δ13C and δ15N values of charred barley in a Middle Bronze Age silo at Ebla (NW Syria). Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 26:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentino G, Ferrio JP, Bogaard A, Araus JL, Riehl S (2014) Stable isotopes in archaeobotanical research. Veget Hist Archaeobot 24:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firbank L (1988) Agrostemma Githago L. (Lychnis Githago (L.) Scop. J Ecol 76:1,232–1,246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer V (2006) Charred cereals and other remains. In: Niblett R (author) Verulamium: excavations within the Roman Town 1986–1988. Britannia 37:53–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulford M (2000) The organisation of legionary supply: the Claudian invasion of Britain. In: Brewer R (ed) Roman fortresses and their legions. Society of Antiquaries, London, pp 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulford M, Timby J (2000) Late Iron Age and Roman Silchester: excavations on the site of the Forum Basilica, 1977, 1980–1986 (Britannia Monograph Series 15). Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall A (2003) Recognition and characterisation of turves in archaeological occupation deposits by means of macrofossil plant remains. (Centre for Archaeology Report 16/2003) English Heritage, Portsmouth

  • Hamilton WD, Haselgrove C, Gosden C (2015) The impact of Bayesian chronologies in the British Iron Age. World Archaeol 47:642–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselgrove C (1982) Wealth, prestige and power: the dynamics of Late Iron Age political centralization in south-east England. In: Renfrew A, Shennan S (eds) Ranking, resource and exchange. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbæk H (1964) The Isca grain, a Roman plant introduction in Britain. New Phytol 63:158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JD (2007) The dynamics of social change in Later Iron Age eastern and south-eastern England c. 300 bcad 43. In: Haselgrove C, Moore T (eds) The later Iron Age in Britain and beyond. Oxbow, Oxford, pp 16–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JD (2011) How did British middle and late pre-Roman Iron Age societies work (if they did)? In: Moore T, Armada X (eds) Atlantic Europe in the first millennium bc: crossing the divide. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 242–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Preston CD, Roy DB (2004) PLANTATT. Attributes of British and Irish plants: status, size, life history, geography and habitats. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Huntingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G (1984) Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: ethnographic models from Greece. In: Casparie W, van Zeist W (eds) Plants and ancient man: studies in palaeoethnobotany. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 43–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G (1991) Numerical analysis in archaeobotany. In: Van Zeist W, Wasylikowa K, Behre KE (eds) Progress in Old World palaeoethnobotany. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G, Bogaard A, Halstead P, Charles M, Smith H (1999) Identifying the intensity of crop husbandry practices on the basis of weed floras. Ann Brit School Athens 94:167–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones G, Charles M, Bogaard A, Hodgson J (2010) Crops and weeds: the role of functional weed ecology in the identification of crop husbandry methods. J Archaeol Sci 37:70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HL (ed) (1924) The geography of Strabo. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M (1981) The development of crop husbandry. In: Jones M, Dimbleby G (eds) The environment of man: the Iron Age to the Anglo-Saxon period. (BAR British Series 87). British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, pp 95–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M (1984) The plant remains. In: Cunliffe B (ed) Danebury: an Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire, vol 2, the excavations, 1969–1978: the finds. (Council for British Archaeology Research Report 52). CBA, London, pp 483–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M (1985) Archaeobotany beyond subsistence reconstruction. In: Barker G, Gamble C (eds) Beyond domestication in prehistoric Europe. Academic Press, London, pp 107–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M (2007) A feast of Beltain? Reflections on the rich Danebury harvests. In: Gosden C, Hamerow H, de Jersey P, Lock P (eds) Communities and connections: essays in honour of Barry Cunliffe. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 142–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M, Robinson M (1984) The crop plants. In: Miles D (ed) Archaeology at Barton Court Farm, Abingdon, Oxon. Oxford Archaeological Unit and Council for British Archaeology, Oxford, pp 9:E10–9:F8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay QON (1971a) Anthemis cotula L.. J Ecol 59:623–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay QON (1971b) Anthemis arvensis L.. J Ecol 59:637–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 15:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot E, Stevens RE (2012) Stable isotope investigations of charred barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum spelta) grains from Danebury hillfort: implications for palaeodietary reconstructions. J Archaeol Sci 39:656–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.10.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodwick L (2014) Condiments before Claudius: new plant foods at the Late Iron Age oppidum at Silchester, UK. Veget Hist Archaeobot 23:543–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodwick LA (2015) An archaeobotanical analysis of Silchester and the wider region. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Oxford

  • Lodwick LA (2017) Agricultural innovations at a Late Iron Age oppidum: archaeobotanical evidence for flax, food and fodder from Calleva Atrebatum, UK. Quat Int 460:198–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.02.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madgwick R, Mulville J (2015) Feasting on fore-limbs: conspicuous consumption and identity in later prehistoric Britain. Antiquity 89:629–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madgwick R, Lewis J, Grimes V, Guest P (2017) On the hoof: exploring the supply of animals to the Roman legionary fortress at Caerleon using strontium (87Sr/86Sr) isotope analysis. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-017-0539-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathers S, Smith N (2000) Geology of the Reading district—a brief explanation of the geological map. Sheet explanation of the British geological survey. 1:50,000 Sheet 268 Reading (England and Wales). British Geological Society Keyworth, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly D (2006) An imperial possession: Britain in the Roman empire, 54 bcad 409. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna R (2012) Carbonized and waterlogged plant macrofossils and charcoal. In: Preston S (ed) Settlement and landscape archaeology in the middle Thames valley: Slough and environs (Thames Valley Archaeological Service Monograph 14). TVAS, Reading, pp 161–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Met Office (2015). http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/weather/climate/. Accessed 28 Jun 2015

  • Minniti C, Valenzuela-Lamas S, Evans J, Albarella U (2014) Widening the market. Strontium isotope analysis on cattle teeth from Owslebury (Hampshire, UK) highlights changes in livestock supply between the Iron Age and the Roman period. J Archaeol Sci 42:305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore T (2007) Perceiving communities: exchange, landscapes and social networks in the later Iron Age of western Britain. Oxf J Archaeol 26:79–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore T (2012) Beyond the oppida: polyfocal complexes and late Iron Age societies in southern Britain. Oxf J Archaeol 31:391–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore T (2017) Beyond Iron Age ‘towns’ examining Oppida as examples of low-density urbanism. Oxf J Archaeol 36:287–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/ojoa.12116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural England (2014) National Character Areas—defining England’s natural boundaries. http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/publications/nca/default.aspx. Accessed May 14 2014

  • New JK (1961) Spergula arvensis L.. J Ecol 49:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pals JP, Hakbijl T (1992) Weed and insect infestation of a grain cargo in a ship at the Roman fort of Laurium in Woerden (Province of Zuid-Holland). Rev Palaeobot Palynol 73:287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling R (2009) Charred plant remains. In: Wright J (ed) Excavation of prehistoric and Romano-British sites at Marnel Park and Merton Rise (Popley) Basingstoke, 2004–2008. Wessex Archaeology, Salisbury, pp 54–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling R, Campbell G, Carruthers W, Hunter K, Marshall P (2015) Exploring contamination (intrusion and residuality) in the archaeobotanical record: case studies from central and southern England. Veget Hist Archaeobot 24:85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt M (2010) Re-thinking the southern British oppida: networks, kingdoms and material culture. Eur J Archaeol 13:32–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston C, Pearman D, Hall A (2004) Archaeophytes in Britain. Bot J Linn Soc 145:257–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson M (1981) The Iron Age to early Saxon environment of the upper Thames terraces. In: Jones M, Dimbleby G (eds) The environment of man: the Iron Age to the Anglo-Saxon period (BAR Brit Ser 87). BAR, Oxford, pp 251–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson M (1992) Environmental archaeology of the river gravels: past achievements and future directions. In: Fulford M, Nichols E (eds) Developing landscapes of lowland Britain. Society of Antiquaries, London, pp 47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskams S (1999) The hinterlands of Roman York: present patterns and future strategies. In: Hurst H (ed) The Coloniae of Roman Britain: new studies and a review. (Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 36) Journal of Roman Archaeology, Portsmouth, Rhode Island, 45–72

  • Sauer E (2002) The Roman invasion of Britain (ad 43) in imperial perspective: a response to Frere and Fulford. Oxf J Archaeol 21:333–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples N (2010) Social relations in later prehistory: Wessex in the first millennium bc. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace C (2010) New flora of the British Isles, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens C (1996) Iron Age and Roman agriculture in the upper Thames valley: archaeobotanical and social perspectives. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Cambridge

  • Stevens C (2003) An investigation of agricultural consumption and production models for prehistoric and Roman Britain. Environ Archaeol 8:61–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straker V (1987) Carbonized cereal grain from first-century London: a summary of the evidence for importation and crop processing. In: Marsden P (ed) The Roman Forum site in London. H.M.S.O., London, pp 151–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers J, Campbell G (2008) Charred plant remains. In: Cunliffe B (ed) The Danebury Environs Roman programme: a Wessex landscape during the Roman era. vol 2, Part 4: Thruxton, Hants, 2002. English Heritage and Oxford University School of Archaeology, Oxford, pp 102–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF, Ŝmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide. Biometris, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen M (1989) Charred grain assemblages from Roman-period corn driers in Britain. Archaeol J 146:302–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen M (1994) Reports on the biological remains. In: Bidwell P, Speak S (eds) Excavations at South Shields Roman Fort. (Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle upon Tyne Monograph Series 4). SANT, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp 243–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen M (2014) Arable farming, horticulture, and food: expansion, innovation, and diversity in Roman Britain. In: Millett M, Revell L, Moore A (eds) The Oxford handbook of Roman Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697713.013.046

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen M, Fieller N (1982) Sampling seeds. J Archaeol Sci 9:287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen M, O’Connor TP (1998) The expansion of agricultural production in Late Iron Age and Roman Britain. In: Bayley J (ed) Science in archaeology: an agenda for the future. English Heritage Occasional Paper). EH, London, pp 127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen M (1992) Crop husbandry regimes: an archaeobotanical study of farming in Northern England 1000 bcad 500. Collis Publications, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen M, Jones G (2006) A re-analysis of agricultural production and consumption: implications for understanding the British Iron Age. Veget Hist Archaeobot 15:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen M, Livarda A, Hill A (2007) The archaeobotany of Roman Britain: current state and identification of research priorities. Britannia 38:181–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace MP, Jones G, Charles M, Fraser R, Heaton THE, Bogaard A (2015) Stable carbon isotope evidence for Neolithic and Bronze Age crop water management in the Eastern Mediterranean and Southwest Asia. PLoS One 10(6):e0127085. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss E, Kislev M (2004) Plant remains as indicators of economic activity: a case study from Iron Age Ashkelon. J Archaeol Sci 31:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams D (1979) The plant remains. In: Kenward HK, Williams D (eds) Biological evidence from the Roman warehouses in Coney Street (The Archaeology of York 14). Council for British Archaeology, York, pp 52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright J, Powell A, Barclay A (2009) Excavation of prehistoric and Romano-British sites at Marnel Park and Merton Rise (Popley) Basingstoke, 2004–2008. Wessex Archaeology, Salisbury

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was undertaken during an AHRC funded doctoral research project (Grant number AH/I01215X/1) at the University of Oxford. I am grateful to Mark Robinson and Mike Charles for advice with this research, and to Chris Stevens for providing data from Abingdon Vineyard. Mike Fulford provided comments on the text. I am grateful for the constructive feedback from two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa A. Lodwick.

Additional information

Communicated by M. van der Veen.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lodwick, L.A. Arable weed seeds as indicators of regional cereal provenance: a case study from Iron Age and Roman central-southern Britain. Veget Hist Archaeobot 27, 801–815 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-018-0674-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-018-0674-y

Keywords

Navigation