Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cultivation with deliberation: cereals and their growing conditions in prehistory

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The subject of this study is the evaluation of the relationship between cereals grown in prehistory (ca. 5500 bc–ad 600) and environmental conditions during their cultivation on the land that is now the Czech Republic. Charred cereal macroremains were taken from 84 archaeological sites. The representation of species at individual sites was assessed with regard to site altitude, average temperature, precipitation, length of the growing season, soil types and soil productivity within a 1 km buffer zone around each archaeological site. The suitability of using present day environmental data to describe past environmental differences among archaeological sites was verified by expressing environmental conditions using Ellenberg indication values of macroremains of wild taxa. The results of the cereals-environmental conditions analysis show that the most important factor for the crop choice was the period of time of its cultivation. After eliminating the effect of time and length of the growing season, soil quality and altitude become conclusive variables, however with different importance in various periods. The main differences between the macroremain assemblages are represented by the varying proportions of cultivated wheats and barley. In the Neolithic (Proto–Eneolithic) there was no observable effect of environmental factors on the cereal composition. In the Middle Eneolithic–Middle Bronze Age soil type was the main factor in the selection of barley or emmer. In the Late Bronze–Early Iron Ages precipitation, altitude and Chernozems were the decisive factors influencing cereal cultivation while in the Late Iron Age–Migration Period heat load index, precipitation, and the proportion of Fluvisols were the primary determinants. It seems that prehistoric cereal varieties had ecological needs similar to present-day species and the selection of crops took place with respect to local conditions and an effort to achieve an optimum yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakels C (1997) The beginning of manuring in western Europe. Antiquity 71:442–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakels C (2005) Crops produced in the southern Netherlands and Northern France during the early medieval period: a comparison. Veget Hist Archaeobot 14:394–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakels C (2009) The Western European loess belt. Agrarian history, 5300 BC–AD1000. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakels C (2014) The choice of a crop and its underlying reasons: examples from western central Europe 500 BCE–CE 900. In: Chevalier A, Marinova E, Peña-Chocarro L (eds) Plants and people, choices and diversity through time. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Behre K-E, Jacomet S (1991) The ecological interpretation of archaeobotanical data. In: Van Zeist W, Wasylikowa K, Behre K-E (eds) Progress in old world palaeoethnobotany. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 81–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24:43–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop RR, Church MJ, Rowly-Conwy PA (2009) Cereals, fruits and nuts in the Scottish Neolithic. Proc Soc Antiqu Scotl 139:47–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaard A (2004) Neolithic farming in Central Europe. An archaeobotanical study of crop husbandry practices. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaard A (2012) Middening and manuring in Neolithic Europe: issues of plausibility, intensity and archaeological method. In: Jones RL (ed) Manure matters: Historical, archaeological and ethnographic perspectives. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham, pp 25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaard A, Fraser RA, Heaton THE et al (2013) Crop manuring and intensive land management by Europe’s first farmers. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:12,589–12,594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouby L, Boissinot P, Marinval P (2011) Never mind the bottle. Archaeobotanical evidence of beer-brewing in Mediterranean France and the consumption of alcoholic beverages during the 5th century BC. Hum Ecol 39:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappers RTJ (1995) A palaeoecological model for the interpretation of wild plant species. Veget Hist Archaeobot 4:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappers RTJ, Bekker RM, Jans JEA (2006) Digitale zadenatlas van Nederland. Groningen archaeological studies 4. Barkhuis, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles M, Jones G, Hodgson JG (1997) FIBS in archaeobotany: functional interpretation of weed floras in relation to husbandry practices. J Archaeol Sci 24:1,151–1,161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier A, Marinova E, Peña-Chocarro L (eds) (2007) Plants and People: choices and diversity through time. Early agricultural remnants and technical heritage (EARTH): 8,000 years of resilience and innovation, vol 1. Oxbow Books, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras DA (ed) (2016) The archaeology of human-environment interactions: Strategies for investigating anthropogenic landscapes, dynamic environments, and climate change in the human past. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Demján P, Dreslerová D (2016) Modelling distribution of archaeological settlement evidence based on heterogeneous spatial and temporal data. J Archaeol Sci 69:100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobeš M, Metlička M (2014) Raný eneolit v jihozápadních Čechách. Archeologie západních Čech. Suppl. 1. Západočeské muzeum v Plzni, Plzeň

  • Dreslerová D, Kočár P (2013) Trends in cereal cultivation in the Czech Republic from the Neolithic to the Migration period (5500 BC–AD 580). Veget Hist Archaeobot 22:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreslerová D, Kočár P, Chuman T, Šefrna L, Poništiak Å (2013) Variety in cereal production in the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages in relation to environmental conditions. J Archaeol Sci 40:1,988–2,000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreslerová D, Kočár P, Chuman T (2016) Pravěké osídlení, půdy a zemědělské strategie—Prehistoric societies, soils and agricultural strategies. Archeologické rozhledy 68:19–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H, Weber E, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica 18. Goltze, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot M, Lentjes D, Zeiler J (eds) (2013) Barely surviving or more than enough? The environmental archaeology of subsistence, specialisation and surplus food production. Sidestone Press, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson S (2000) Carbonized cereal grains and weed seeds in prehistoric houses—an experimental perspective. J Archaeol Sci 27:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyulai F (2010) Archaeobotany in Hungary. Archeolingua, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberle J, Mikysková J (2006) Relation of cereals yields and variability to soil-climate and production characteristics of districts of the Czech Republic. J Cent Eur Agric 7–4:661–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajnalová E (1989) Evidence of a carbonized loaf of bread and cereals from Bratislava—Devín. Slovenská Archeológia 37:89–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajnalová M, Dreslerová D (2010) Ethnobotany of einkorn and emmer in Romania and Slovakia: towards interpretation of archaeological evidence. Památky archeologické 101:169–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday G, Beadle M (1983) Consolidated index to Flora Europaea. CUP Archive, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead P, O´Shea J (1989) Introduction: cultural responses to risk and uncertainty. In: Halstead P, O´Shea J (eds) Bad year economics. Cultural responses to risk and uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman G (1991) Phytosociology and ancient weed floras: taking account of taphonomy and changes in cultivation methods. In: Harris DR, Thomas KD (eds) Modelling ecological change. Perspectives from neoecology, palaeoecology and environmental archaeology. UCL, London, pp 27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ST, Williams JW (2004) Modern analogs in Quaternary paleoecology: here today, gone yesterday, gone tomorrow? Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 32:495–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacomet S (1987) Prähistorische Getreidefunde. Eigenverlag, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacomet S (2006) Identification of Cereal Remains from Archaeological Sites, 2nd edn. https://ipna.unibas.ch/archbot/pdf/Cereal_Id_Manual_engl.pdf

  • Jiráň L, Venclová N (eds) (2013) The prehistory of Bohemia, Vol 1–7. Instutite of Archaeology of the CAS Prague, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R (ed) (2012) Manure matters. Historical, archaeological and ethnographic perspectives. Ashgate, Farnham Surrey, Burlington

  • Jones G, Halstead P (1995) Maslins, mixtures and monocrops: on the interpretation of archaeobotanical crop samples of heterogeneous composition. J Archaeol Sci 22:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirleis W, Klooß S, Kroll H, Műller J (2012) Crop growing and gathering in the northern German Neolithic: a review supplemented by new results. Veget Hist Archaeobot 21:221–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kočár P, Dreslerová D (2010) Archeobotanické nálezy pěstovaných rostlin v pravěku České republiky—Archeobotanical finds of cultivated plants in the prehistory of the Czech Republic. Památky archeologické 101:203–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Schneider M, Caneppele A, Heiss AG (2015) Land use, economy and cult in late Iron Age ritual centres: an archaeobotanical study of the La Tène site at Sandberg-Roseldorf, Lower Austria. Veget Hist Archaeobot 24:517–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreisz S (2009) Malting. In: Eßlingen HM (ed) Handbook of brewing: processes, technology, markets. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 147–164

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuz A (2004) Landwirtschaft im Umbruch? Archäobotanische Untersuchungen zu den Jahrhunderten um Christi Geburt in Hessen und Mainfranken. Ber RGK 85:97–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Laghetti G, Fiorentino G, Hammer K et al (2009) On the trail of the last autochthonous Italian einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.) and emmer (Triticum dicoccon Schrank) populations: a mission impossible? Genet Resour Crop Evol 56:1,163–1,170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti Lippi M, Bellini C, Mori Secci M (2010) Palaeovegetational reconstruction based on pollen and seeds/fruits from a Bronze Age archaeological site in Tuscany (Italy). Plant Biosyst 144:902–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Keon D (2002) Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load index. J Veg Sci 13:603–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Němeček J, Mašát K, Džatko M (1985) Systém bodového hodnocení produkčního potenciálu BPEJ (System of point valuation of productivity of BPEJ). Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation e VÚMOP, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall SDM (1989) Palaeoethnobotany. A handbook of procedures. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersson M (2006) Djurhållning och betesdrift. djur, människor och landskap ivästra Östergötland under yngre bronsålder och äldre järnålder [Animal Husbandry and Organised Grazing. Animals, People and Landscape in Western Östergötland during the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age). Riksantikvarieämbetet, Linköping

  • Pliny the Elder: The Natural History (translation Bostock J, Riley HT). Taylor and Francis (1855) Book 18, Chap. 40. https://perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Plin.+Nat.+toc

  • Procopiou H (2014) Barley meal processing in the Aegean World: a look at diversity. In: Van Gijn A, Whittaker JC, Anderson PC (eds) Exploring and explaining diversity in agricultural technology. Oxbow Press, Oxford, pp 243–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Rösch M (1998) The history of crops and crop weeds in south-western Germany from the Neolithic period to modern times, as shown by archaeobotanical evidence. Veget Hist Archaeobot 7:109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rösch M (2013) Land use and food production in central Europe from the Neolithic to the medieval period: change of landscape, soils and agricultural systems according to archaeobotanical data. In: Kerig T, Zimmermann A (eds) Economic archaeology: from structure to performance in European archaeology. Habelt, Bonn, pp 109–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadori L, Mercuri AM, Mariotti M (2010) Reconstructing past cultural landscape and human impact using pollen and plant macroremains. Plant Biosyst 144:940–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salač V (2013) Bohemia as a model territory for research on transport and trade in prehistory. In: Kerig T, Zimmermann A (eds) Economic archaeology. From structure to performance in European archaeology. Universitätsforsch prähist Archäol 237. Habelt, Bonn, pp 265–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Šálková T (2010) Analýza rostlinných makrozbytků z objektů sídliště mladší doby bronzové v Březnici. In: Furmánek V, Miroššayová E (eds) Popolnicové polia a doba halštatská. Archeologický ústav SAV, Nitra, pp 308–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Schibler J, Hüster-Plogmann, H, Jacomet S, Brombacher C, Gross-Klee E, Rast-Eicher A (1997) Ökonomie und Ökologie neolithischer und bronzezeitlicher Ufersiedlungen am Zürichsee. Monogr Kantonsarchäol Zürich 20. Fotorotar, Zürich und Egg

  • Sigaut F (2014) Crops and agricultural developments in Western Europe. In: Chevalier A, Marinova E, Peña-Chocarro L (eds) Plants and people: choices and diversity through time. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Špaldon E, Andraščík M, Bechyně M et al (1982) Rostlinná výroba. Státní zemědělské nakladatelství, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Stika HP (1996) Traces of a possible Celtic brewery in Eberdingen-Hochdorf, Kreis Ludwigsburg, southwest Germany. Veget Hist Archaeobot 5:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tempír Z (1976) K rozšireniu pestovania pšenice dvojzrnej (Triticum dicoccon Schrank) v západnich Karpatoch. Agrikultura 14. Slovenske poľnohospodarske muzeum, Nitra, pp 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempír Z (2007) Feldfrüchte und Unkraut der Völkerwanderungszeit in Březno. In: Pleinerova I (ed) Březno und germanische Siedlungen der jüngeren Völkerwanderungszeit in Böhmen. Archeologický ústav AV ČR, Praha, pp 97–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolasz R, Miková T, Valeriánová A, Voženílek V (eds) (2007) Atlas podnebí Česka [Climate atlas of Czechia]. Český hydrometeorologický ústav, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen M (1992) Crop husbandry regimes. An archaeobotanical study of farming in northern England. Sheffield Archaeol Monogr 3. Collis, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltr V (2012) Concept of soil fertility and soil productivity evaluation of agricultural sites in the Czech Republic. Arch Agron Soil Sci 58(Suppl 1):S243–S251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voltr V, Hruška, M, Froněk P, Hlavsa T (2014) Fertility and productivity of soils in the Czech Republic. In: Proceedings, 9th International Soil Science Congress. Side, Antalya, pp 1,018–1,025

  • Wasylikowa K (1981) The role of fossil weeds for the study of former agriculture. Zeitschr Archäol 15:11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann WH (1999) Why was cattle-stalling introduced in prehistory? The significance of byre and stable and of outwintering. In: Fabech C, Ringtved J (eds) Settlement and landscape. Jutland Archaeological Society, Ǻrhus, pp 295–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary D, Hopf M (2000) Domestication of plants in the old world. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Luděk Šefrna and Čeněk Čišecký for useful comments, and the technical support. Institutional support was provided by the Institute of Archaeology of Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague (RVO:67985912).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Archaeology of the CAS, Prague, v.v.i., Letenská 4, 11801, Praha 1, Czech Republic

    Dagmar Dreslerová, Petr Kočár & Adéla Pokorná

  2. Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 6, 128 43, Praha 2, Czech Republic

    Tomáš Chuman

Authors
  1. Dagmar Dreslerová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Petr Kočár
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tomáš Chuman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adéla Pokorná
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dagmar Dreslerová.

Additional information

Communicated by C. C. Bakels.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLS 377 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dreslerová, D., Kočár, P., Chuman, T. et al. Cultivation with deliberation: cereals and their growing conditions in prehistory. Veget Hist Archaeobot 26, 513–526 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-017-0609-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-017-0609-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation