Vegetation History and Archaeobotany

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 75–84 | Cite as

Inferring the agrobiodiversity of Vitis vinifera L. (grapevine) in ancient Greece by comparative shape analysis of archaeological and modern seeds

  • Clémence Pagnoux
  • Laurent Bouby
  • Sarah Ivorra
  • Christophe Petit
  • Soultana-Maria Valamoti
  • Thierry Pastor
  • Sandrine Picq
  • Jean-Frédéric Terral
Original Article


The origins and biogeographical history of Vitis vinifera L. (domesticated grapevine) remain largely unknown. Shape and size have long been used as criteria to distinguish between wild and domesticated grape pips. Here we have analyzed variations of seed morphology in order to provide accurate criteria for the discrimination of different groups of varieties. Diversity in present-day cultivars and wild grapevines of Greek and east Mediterranean origin in relation to other Asiatic and European varieties and wild grapevines provides the basis for our analysis, which aims to allow the characterization of the ancient diversity of cultivated grapes in relation to present-day cultivars. Geometric morphometric analyses (Elliptic Fourier Transform method) have been used to characterize the seed shape and size of modern and archaeological material using 40 variables per seed. 197 archaeological grape pips from the 7th century bc sanctuary of Hera in Samos, Greece were compared with an extended reference collection of 269 modern cultivars and 83 wild populations, 10,518 seeds in total. Our study confirms the relationships between seed shape and domestication. Modern diversity is partly structured by the geographical origin of cultivars, but influence of other factors may play a significant role in clustering. The wide diversity of varieties offered at the Heraion of Samos during the Archaic Period, including cultivars growing on the island, imported grapes and wild morphotypes, is related to the history and geographical location of the island as well as to the diversity in the geographical range of pilgrims making offerings to the sanctuary.


Grape pip morphology Viticulture Archaic Period Archaeobotany Diversity Geometric morphometry 



We would like first to acknowledge Thierry Lacombe (INRA) who has been of great help in selecting the historical cultivars to include in our reference collection. We are grateful to INRA Domaine de Vassal (Marseillan, France) which provided pips from modern wild grapevines and cultivars, and especially to Sandrine Lalet (INRA) who helped during sampling. We are grateful to Dušanka Kučan and Felix Bittmann (Niedersächsisches Institut für historische Küstenforschung, NIhK) who gave access to the archaeobotanical material. We thank the referees for useful and constructive comments.

Supplementary material

334_2014_482_MOESM1_ESM.doc (325 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 325 kb)
334_2014_482_MOESM2_ESM.doc (60 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 59 kb)
334_2014_482_MOESM3_ESM.doc (37 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOC 37 kb)
334_2014_482_MOESM4_ESM.doc (64 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOC 64 kb)


  1. Aradhya MK, Dangl GS, Prins BH, Boursiquot JM, Walker MA, Meredith CP, Simon CJ (2003) Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated grape, Vitis vinifera L. Genet Res Camb 81:179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold C, Gillet F, Gobat JM (1998) Situation de la vigne sauvage Vitis vinifera ssp. silvestris en Europe. Vitis 37:159–170Google Scholar
  3. Arroyo-García R, Ruiz-García L, Bolling L, Ocete R et al (2006) Multiple origins of cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sativa) based on chloroplast DNA polymorphism. Mol Ecol 15:3,707–3,714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacilieri R, Lacombe T, Le Cunff L, Di Vecchi-Staraz M, Laucou V, Genna B, Peros JP, This P, Boursiquot JM (2013) Genetic structure in cultivated grapevines is linked to geography and human selection. BMC Plant Biol 2013:13–25Google Scholar
  5. Barnard H, Dooley AN, Areshian G, Gasparyan G, Faull KF (2011) Chemical evidence for wine production around 4000 BCE in the Late Chalcolithic Near Eastern Highlands. J Arch Sci 38:977–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonhomme V, Picq S, Gaucherel C, Claude J (2014) Momocs: outline Analysis using R. J Stat Software 56:1–24Google Scholar
  7. Bouby L, Marinval P (2001) La vigne et les débuts de la viticulture en France : l’apport de l’archéobotanique. Gallia 58:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouby L, Terral JF, Ivorra S, Marinval P, Pradat B, Ruas MP (2006) Vers une approche bio-archéologique de l’histoire de la vigne cultivée et de la viticulture : problématique, choix méthodologiques et premiers résultats. Archéologie du Midi Médiéval 23–24:61–74Google Scholar
  9. Bouby L, Terral JF, Figueiral I, Ivorra S, Lacombe T, Pastor T, Picq S, Buffat L, Fabre L, Jung C, Marinval P, Petitot H, Tardy C (2010) La vigne sauvage (Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris) : une plante cultivée dans les établissements viticoles de Narbonnaise ? In: Delhon C, Théry-Parisot I, Thiébault S (eds) Des Hommes et des plantes. Exploitation du milieu et gestion des ressources végétales de la Préhistoire à nos jours. XXXe rencontres internationales l’archéologie et d’histoire d’Antibes. APDCA, Antibes, pp 129–139Google Scholar
  10. Bouby L, Figueiral I, Bouchette A, Rovira N, Ivorra S, Lacombe T, Pastor T, Picq S, Marinval P, Terral JF (2013) Bioarchaeological insights into the process of domestication of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) during Roman time in Southern France. PLoS ONE 8:e63195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brun JP (2003) Le vin et l’huile dans la Méditerranée antique. Errance, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Brun JP (2004) Archéologie du vin et de l’huile. De la préhistoire à l’époque hellénistique, ErranceGoogle Scholar
  13. Di Vora A, Castelletti L (1995) Indagine preliminare sull’archaeolgia della vite (Vitis vinifera L.) in base ai caratteri diagnostici del vinacciolo. Riv Archaeol dell’Antica Prov e Dioc di Como 176:333–376Google Scholar
  14. Figueiral I, Bouby L, Buffat L, Petitot H, Terral JF (2010) Archaeobotany, vine growing and wine producing in Roman Southern France: le site of Gasquinoy (Béziers, France). J Arch Sci 37:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Figueiral I, Pomarèdes H, Court-Picon M, Bouby L, Tardy C, Terral JF (2014) New insights into Mediterranean Gallo-Roman farming: a closer look at archaeological wells in Southern France. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12520-014-0181-8 Google Scholar
  16. Foxhall L (1998) Cargoes of the heart’s desire: the character of trade in the archaic Mediterranean world. In: Fisher N, Van Wees N (eds) Archaic Greece. New approaches and new evidence, Duckworth, London, pp 295–309Google Scholar
  17. Grassi F, Labra M, Imazio S, Spada A, Sgorbati S, Scienza A, Sala F (2003) Evidence of a secondary grapevine domestication centre detected by SSR analysis. Theor Appl Genet 107:1,315–1,320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansen J, Renfrew JM (1978) Palaeolithic-Neolithic seed remains at Franchthi cave, Greece. Nature 271:349–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacquat C, Martinoli D (1999) Vitis vinifera L.: wild or cultivated? Study of the grape pips found at Petra, Jordan, 150 bcad 40. Veget Hist Archaeobot 8:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kučan D (1995) Zur Ernährung und dem Gebrauch von Pflanzen im Heraion von Samos im 7. Jhd v. Chr. Jb DAI 110:1–64Google Scholar
  21. Kučan D (2000) Rapport synthétique sur les recherches archéobotaniques dans le sanctuaire d’Héra de l’île de Samos. Pallas 52:99–108Google Scholar
  22. Kuhl FP, Giardina CR (1982) Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comput Vision Graph 18:259–278Google Scholar
  23. Lacombe T (2012) Contribution à l’étude de l’histoire évolutive de la vigne cultivée (Vitis vinifera L.) par l’analyse de la diversité génétique neutre et de gènes d’intérêt, Doctoral Thesis, Montpellier SupAgroGoogle Scholar
  24. Lacombe T, Boursiquot JM, Laucou V, Di Vecchi-Staraz M, Peros JP, This P (2013) Large-scale parentage analysis in an extended set of grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). Theor Appl Genet 126:401–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levadoux L (1956) Les populations sauvages et cultivées de Vitis vinifera L. Ann de l’Amélioration des Plantes 6:59–117Google Scholar
  26. Mangafa M, Kotsakis K (1996) A new method for the identification of wild and cultivated charred grape seeds. J Arch Sci 23:409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Margaritis E, Jones M (2006) Beyond cereals: crop processing and Vitis vinifera L. Ethnography, experiments and charred grape remains from Hellenistic Greece. J Arch Sci 33:784–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGovern PE (2004) Ancient wine: the search for origins of viniculture. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  29. McGovern PE, Glusker DL, Exner LJ, Voigt MM (1996) Neolithic resinated wine. Nature 381:480–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller N (2008) Sweeter than wine? The use of the grape in early Western Asia. Antiquity 82:937–946Google Scholar
  31. Myles S, Boyko AR, Owens CL, Brown CJ, Grassi F, Aradhya MK, Prins B, Reynolds A, Chia JM, Ware D, Bustamante CD, Buckler ES (2011) Genetic structure and domestication history of the grape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3,530–3,535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Negrul AM (1946) Origin and classification of cultivated grape. In: Baranov AKY, Lazarevski MA, Palibin TV, Prosmoserdov NN (eds) The Ampelography of the USSR, vol 1. Pischepromizdat, Moscow, pp 159–216Google Scholar
  33. Olmo HP (1995) The origin and domestication of the vinifera grape. In: McGovern PE, Fleming JS, Katz SH (eds) The origins and ancient history of wine (Food and nutrition in history and anthropology series 11). Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, pp 31–43Google Scholar
  34. Orrù M, Grillo O, Lovicu G, Venora G, Bacchetta G (2013) Morphological characterization of Vitis vinifera L. by image analysis and comparison with archaeological remains. Veget Hist Archaeobot 22:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Picq S (2012) Diversité et évolution chez Vitis vinifera L. de traits impliqués dans le syndrome de domestication et dans la biologie de la reproduction, Doctoral thesis, Université Montpellier 2Google Scholar
  36. Picq S, Santoni S, Lacombe T, Latreille M, Weber A, Ardisson M, Ivorra S, Maghradze D, Arroyo-Garcia R, This P, Terral JF, Bacilieri R (2012) A small XY chromosomal region explains sex determination in wild dioecious grapevines and the reversal to hermaphroditism in domesticated V. vinifera L. BMC Plant BiolGoogle Scholar
  37. Renfrew JM (1966) A report on recent finds of carbonized cereal grains and seeds from Prehistoric Thessaly. Thessalika 5:21–36Google Scholar
  38. Renfrew JM (1989) Carbonized grains and seeds. In: Gimbutas M, Winn S, Shimanbuku D (eds) Achilleion: a Neolithic settlement in Thessaly, Greece, 6400–5600 bc. Institute of Archaeology, UCLA, pp 307–310Google Scholar
  39. Renfrew JM (1995) Palaeoethnobotanical finds of Vitis from Greece. In: McGovern PE, Fleming JS, Katz SH (eds) The origins and ancient history of wine (Food and nutrition in history and anthropology, series 11). Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, pp 255–267Google Scholar
  40. Sarpaki A (1995) Toumba Balomenou, Chaeronia: plant remains from the early and middle neolithic levels. In: Kroll H, Pasternak M (eds) Res archaeobotanicae. Oetker-Voges, Kiel, pp 281–300Google Scholar
  41. Sefc KM, Lopes MS, Lefort F et al (2000) Microsatellite variability in grapevine cultivars from different European regions and evaluation of assignment testing to assess the geographic origin of cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 100:498–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shipley G (1987) A history of Samos. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith H, Jones G (1990) Experiments on the effects of charring on cultivated grape seeds. J Arch Sci 17:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stummer A (1911) Zur Urgeschichte der Rebe und des Weinbaues. Mitt Anthropol Ges Wien 61:283–296Google Scholar
  45. Terral JF, Tabard E, Bouby L, Ivorra S, Pastor T, Figueiral I, Picq S, Chevance JB, Jung C, Fabre L, Tardy C, Compan M, Bacilieri R, Lacombe T, This P (2010) Evolution and history of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) under domestication: new morphometric perspectives to understand seed domestication syndrome and reveal origins of ancient European cultivars. Ann Bot 105:443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Terral JF, Newton C, Ivorra S, Gros-Balthazard M, Gros-Balthazard M, de Tito Morais C, Picq S, Tengberg M, Pintaud JC (2012) Insights into the complex historical biogeography of date palm agrobiodiversity (Phoenix dactylifera L.) using geometric morphometrical analysis of modern seeds from various origins and Egyptian ancient material. J Biogeogr 39:929–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. This P, Lacombe T, Thomas MR (2006) Historical origins and genetic diversity of wine grapes. Trends Genet 22:511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Valamoti SM, Mangafa M, Koukouli-Chrysanthaki C, Malamidou D (2007) Grape-pressings from northern Greece: the earliest wine in the Aegean? Antiquity 81:54–61Google Scholar
  49. Zohary D (1995) The domestication of the grapevine Vitis vinifera L in the Near East. In: McGovern PE, Fleming JS, Katz SH (eds) The origins and ancient history of wine (Food and nutrition in history and anthropology, series 11). Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, pp 23–30Google Scholar
  50. Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E (2012) Domestication of plants in the Old World, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clémence Pagnoux
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laurent Bouby
    • 2
  • Sarah Ivorra
    • 2
  • Christophe Petit
    • 1
  • Soultana-Maria Valamoti
    • 3
  • Thierry Pastor
    • 2
  • Sandrine Picq
    • 2
  • Jean-Frédéric Terral
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, UMR 7041Maison de l’Archéologie et de l’EthnologieNanterreFrance
  2. 2.Centre de Bio-Archéologie et d’Ecologie, UMR 5059Institut de botaniqueMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.Department of ArchaeologyAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  4. 4.Université Montpellier 2Montpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations