Vegetation History and Archaeobotany

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 743–749 | Cite as

Optimal counting limit for fungal spore abundance estimation using Sporormiella as a case study

Original Article

Abstract

The use of non-pollen palynomorphs, and among them spores of coprophilous fungi, has become greatly important in palaeoecological studies. Particularly, the genus Sporormiella has been demonstrated to be the most valuable proxy for the presence of wild and domestic herbivores. This genus could also be used to determine livestock density and reconstruct pastoral pressure during the Holocene. Non-standard counting methods have been established to determine coprophilous fungal spore abundance in sediments. Moreover, these analyses are faced with the recurrent problem of setting the minimum counting sum as small as possible to save time. We researched the reliability of Sporormiella concentration estimates based on different counting sums, using low to high count samples. Box-plots indicate that the variability of inferred Sporormiella concentrations decreases progressively with increasing sums. Statistical comparisons show that the means of box-plots became stabilised after the counts have reached 300–350 exotic marker grains. Moreover, a count of 300–350 exotic marker grains is sufficient to produce a Sporormiella concentration estimate, whatever the amount. Finally, we propose that this counting limit is valid for other fungal spores as well.

Keywords

Non-pollen palynomorphs Coprophilous fungi Sporormiella Counting method 

References

  1. Ahmed SI, Cain RF (1972) Revision of Genera Sporormia and Sporormiella. Can J Bot 50:419–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker AG, Bhagwat SA, Willis KJ (2013) Do dung fungal spores make a good proxy for past distribution of large herbivores? Quat Sci Rev 62:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birck C, Epaillard I, Leccia MF, Crassous C, Morand A, Miaud C, Bertrand C, Cavalli L, Jacquet S, Moullec P, Bonnet R, Sagot C, Franquet E, Nellier YM, Pergua ME, Cottin N, Pignol C, Malet E, Naffrechoux E, Giguet-Covex C, Jouffroy-Bapicot I, Etienne D, Millet L, Sabatier P, Wihelm B, Perren B, Arnaud F (2013) Sentinel lakes: a network for the study and management of mountain lakes in French Alps and in Corsica. Eco Mont 5:41–47Google Scholar
  4. Conedera M, Tinner W, Neff C, Meurer M, Dickens AF, Krebs P (2009) Reconstructing past fire regimes: methods, applications, and relevance to fire management and conservation. Quat Sci Rev 28:555–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cugny C, Mazier F, Galop D (2010) Modern and fossil non-pollen palynomorphs from the Basque mountains (western Pyrenees, France): the use of coprophilous fungi to reconstruct pastoral activity. Veget Hist Archaeobot 19:391–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Currás A, Zamora L, Reed JM, Garciá-Soto E, Ferrero S, Armangol X, Mezquita-Joanes F, Marqués MA, Riera S, Julià R (2012) Climate change and human impact in central Spain during Roman times: high-resolution multi-proxy analysis of a tufa lake record (Somolinos, 1,280 m asl). Catena 89:31–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis MB (1969) Climate changes in southern Connecticut recorded by pollen deposition at Rogers Lake. Ecology 50:409–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doyen E, Vannière B, Berger JF, Arnaud F, Tachikawa K, Bard E (2013a) Land-use changes and environmental dynamics in the Upper Rhone valley since Neolithic times inferred from sediments in Lac Moras. Holocene 23:961–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doyen E, Vannière B, Bichet V, Gauthier E, Richard H, Petit C (2013b) Vegetation history and landscape management from 6500 to 1500 cal. b.p. at Lac d’Antre, Gallo-Roman sanctuary of Villards d’Héria, Jura, France. Veget Hist Archaeobot 22:83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Etienne D, Wilhelm B, Sabatier P, Reyss JL, Arnaud F (2013) Influence of sample location and livestock numbers on Sporormiella concentrations and accumulation rates in surface sediments of Lake Allos, French Alps. J Paleolimnol 49:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fægri K, Iversen J (1989) In: Fægri K, Kaland PE, Krzwywinski K (eds) Textbook of pollen analysis, 4th edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  12. Faith JT (2011) Late Pleistocene climate change, nutrient cycling, and the megafaunal extinctions in North America. Quat Sci Rev 30:1,675–1,680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finsinger W, Tinner W (2005) Minimum count sums for charcoal-concentration estimates in pollen slides: accuracy and potential errors. Holocene 15:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gauthier E, Massa C, Bichet V, Vannière B, Petit C, Richard H (2010) Pollen and non pollen palynomorph evidence of medieval farming activities in Greenland. Veget Hist Archaeobot 19:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gill JL, Williams JW, Jackson ST, Donnelly JP, Schellinger GC (2012) Climatic and megaherbivory controls on late-glacial vegetation dynamics: a new, high resolution, multi-proxy record from Silver Lake, Ohio. Quat Sci Rev 34:66–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graf MT, Chmura GL (2006) Development of modern analogues for natural, mowed and grazed grasslands using pollen assemblages and coprophilous fungi. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 141:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heiri O, Lotter AF (2001) Effect of low count sums on quantitative environmental reconstructions: an example using subfossil chironomids. J Paleolimnol 26:343–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hicks S, Hyvärinen H (1999) Pollen influx values measured in different sedimentary environments and their palaeoecological implications. Grana 38:228–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maher LJJ (1972) Nomograms for counting 0.95 confidence limits of pollen data. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 13:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maher LJJ (1981) Statistics for microfossil concentration measurements employing samples spiked with marker grains. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 32:153–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maher LJJ, Heiri O, Lotter AF (2013) Assessment of uncertainties associated with paleolimnological laboratory methods and microfossils analysis. In: Birks HJB, Lotter AF, Juggins J, Smol JP (eds) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments. Springer, Berlin, pp 143–166Google Scholar
  22. Mighall TM, Martínez-Cortizas A, Biester H, Turner SE (2006) Proxy climate and vegetation changes during the last five millennia in NW Iberia: pollen and non-pollen palynomorph data from two ombrotrophic peat bogs in the North Western Iberian Peninsula. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 141:203–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mosimann JE (1965) Statistical methods for the pollen analyst: multinomial and negative multinomial techniques. In: Kummel B, Raup D (eds) Handbook of paleontological techniques. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 636–673Google Scholar
  24. Parker NE, Williams JW (2011) Influences of climate, cattle density, and lake morphology on Sporormiella abundances in modern lake sediments in the US Great Plains. Holocene 22:475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Payne RJ, Mitchell EAD (2009) How many is enough? Determining optimal count totals for ecological and palaeoecological studies of testate amoebae. J Paleolimnol 42:483–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quesada M, Bollman K, Stephenson AG (1995) Leaf damage decreases pollen production and hinders pollen performance in Cucurbita texana. Ecology 76:437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raper D, Bush M (2009) A test of Sporormiella representation as a predictor of megaherbivore presence and abundance. Quat Res 71:490–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  29. Stockmarr J (1971) Tablets with spores used in absolute pollen analysis. Pollen Spores 13:615–621Google Scholar
  30. Thomson VP, Nicotra AB, Cunningham SA (2004) Herbivory differentially affects male and female reproductive traits of Cucumis sativus. Plant Biol 6:621–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van der Linden M, Kooistra L, Engels S (eds) (2012) Non-pollen palynomorphs as relevant indicators in palaeoecology and archaeobotany. (Rev Palaeobot Palynol 186) Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Geel B, Aptroot A (2006) Fossil ascomycetes in Quaternary deposits. Nova Hedwig 82:313–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Geel B, Buurman J, Brinkkemper O, Schelvis J, Aptroot A, van Reenen GBA, Hakbijl T (2003) Environmental reconstruction of a Roman Period settlement site in Uitgeest (The Netherlands), with special reference to coprophilous fungi. J Archaeol Sci 30:873–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walanus A, Nalepka D (2013) Information content of zero pollen counts in Holocene profiles. Holocene 23:732–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilhelm B, Arnaud F, Sabatier P, Crouzet C, Brisset E, Chaumillon E, Disnar JP, Guiter F, Malet E, Reyss JL, Tachikawa K, Bard E, Delannoy JL (2012) 1400 years of extreme precipitation patterns over the Mediterranean French Alps and possible forcing mechanisms. Quat Res 78:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wood JR, Wilmshurst JM (2013) Accumulation rates or percentages? How to quantify Sporormiella and other coprophilous fungal spores to detect late Quaternary megafaunal extinction events. Quat Sci Rev 77:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood JR, Wilmshurst JM, Worthy TH, Cooper A (2011) Sporormiella as a proxy for non-mammalian herbivores in island ecosystems. Quat Sci Rev 30:915–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire CARRTEL UMR INRA 042Université de SavoieLe-Bourget-du-Lac CedexFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire Chrono-Environnement UMR CNRS 6249Université de Franche-ComtéBesançon CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations