Advertisement

Vegetation History and Archaeobotany

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 299–308 | Cite as

After 8 years of annual pollen trapping across the tree line in western Norway: are the data still anomalous?

  • Anne Elisabeth BjuneEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The modern pollen production of local sub-alpine and alpine vegetation has been monitored over 8 years by using pollen traps situated along an elevational transect crossing the Pinus sylvestris and Betula pubescens elevational limits and continuing into the mid- and high-alpine vegetation in western Norway. The aim of the study is to monitor annual variation in the pollen production and hence the representation of common taxa found at or near the tree-line. The results can be used to derive critical pollen values that can be used to infer the presence of these taxa in the past, and to reconstruct past changes in tree line positions. Nine modified Tauber pollen traps were critically positioned in the vegetation from 663 to 1,347 m a.s.l. Three sub-aquatic traps were located in a small lake at 800 m a.s.l. just above the present-day B. pubescens tree-line. The traps have been sampled from 2004 to 2012. The results display large variations in pollen percentages and pollen accumulation rates from year to year, as well as great differences between the traps placed in the vegetation and in the lake, suggesting that further pollen trapping is needed to get a solid long-term average. The vegetation traps follow the vegetation distribution better and, as expected, give a more local signal than the lake traps.

Keywords

Monitoring Pollen Pollen accumulation rates Pollen traps Concentrations Tree-line ecotone 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is dedicated to Hilary H. Birks on the occasion of her 70th birthday and as recognition of all her work, efforts and contributions to palaeoecology! I am very grateful to Hilary for developing the DOORMAT project together with me. I am also grateful to all the fieldwork assistants who have helped setting out and collecting the traps from 2004 until today, and to Trond Brattelid for designing and making the traps! I am also grateful to Vivian A. Felde for help in making the box plots used in this paper, to John Birks for help in the field, ideas and input along the way and also for helpful comments and suggestions improving this manuscript. And to Sheila Hicks for showing the importance of pollen monitoring and encouraging me to continue. I thank Pim van der Knaap and one anonymous reviewer for valuable comments helping to improve this manuscript. This work has been funded by Bergen Myrdyrkningsfond (in 2004) and from the Olaf Grolle Olsens legat til UiB med tilførsel av arv etter Miranda Bødtker (Olaf Grolle Olsen’s Legacy to the University of Bergen with the addition of the bequest of Miranda Bødtker) of the University of Bergen from 2004 to 2012. This is publication no. A441 from the Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research.

References

  1. Aario L (1940) Waldgrenzen und subrezente Pollenspektren in Petsamo Lappland. Ann Acad Sci Fenn Ser A 54:1–120Google Scholar
  2. Andersen ST (1970) The relative pollen productivity and pollen representation of north European trees, and correction factors for tree pollen spectra. Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse II Række 96:1–99Google Scholar
  3. Autio J, Hicks S (2004) Annual variations in pollen deposition and meteorological conditions on the fell Aakenustunturi in northern Finland: potential for using fossil pollen as a climate proxy. Grana 43:31–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berglund BE (1973) Pollen dispersal and deposition in an area of southeastern Sweden—some preliminary results. In: Birks HJB, West RG (eds) Quaternary plant ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 117–129Google Scholar
  5. Birks HJB (2005) Fifty years of Quaternary pollen analysis in Fennoscandia 1954–2004. Grana 44:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birks HJB, Birks HH (1980) Quaternary palaeoecology. Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Birks HH, Birks HJB (2000) Future uses of pollen analysis must include plant macrofossils. J Biogeogr 27:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birks HH, Bjune AE (2010) Can we detect a west Norwegian tree line from modern samples of plant remains and pollen? Results from the DOORMAT project. Veget Hist Archaeobot 19:325–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis MB (1973) Redeposition of pollen grains in lake sediment. Limnol Oceanograph 8:44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eide W, Birks HH, Bigelow NH, Peglar SM, Birks HJB (2006) Holocene forest development along the Setesdal valley, southern Norway, reconstructed from macrofossil and pollen evidence. Veget Hist Archaeobot 15:65–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans RD (1994) Empirical evidence of the importance of sediment resuspension in lakes. Hydrobiol 284:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fægri K, Iversen J (1989) In: Fægri K, Kaland PE, Krzywinski K (eds) Textbook of pollen analysis, 4th edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Giesecke T, Bennett KD (2004) The Holocene spread of Picea abies (L.) Karst. in Fennoscandia and adjacent areas. J Biogeogr 31:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giesecke T, Fontana SL (2008) Revisiting pollen accumulation rates from Swedish lake sediments. Holocene 18:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grimm EC (1990) TILIA and TILIA GRAPH. PC spreadsheet and graphics software for pollen data. INQUA Working Group on Data-Handling Methods Newslett 4:5–7Google Scholar
  16. Grimm EC (2004) TGView Version 2.0.2. Illinois State Museum, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  17. Hättestrand M (2013) Eight years of annual pollen monitoring in northern Sweden, from the boreal forest to above the birch forest-line. Grana 52:26–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hättestrand M, Jensen C, Hallsdottir M, Vorren K-D (2008) Modern pollen accumulation rates at the north-western fringe of the European boreal forest. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 151:90–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hicks S (1985) Modern pollen deposition records from Kuusamo, Finland I: seasonal and annual variation. Grana 24:167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hicks S (1986) Modern pollen deposition records from Kuusamo, Finland II: the establishment of pollen: vegetation analogues. Grana 25:183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hicks S (1994) Past and present pollen records of Lapland forests. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 82:17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hicks S (2001) The use of annual arboreal pollen deposition values for delimiting tree-lines in the landscape and exploring models of pollen dispersal. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 117:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hicks S, Hyvärinen H (1999) Pollen influx values measured in different sedimentary environments and their palaeoecological implications. Grana 38:228–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hicks S, Tinsley H, Huusko A, Jensen C, Hättestrand M, Gerasimides A, Kvavadze E (2001) Some comments on spatial variation in arboreal pollen deposition: first record from the Pollen Monitoring Programme (PMP). Rev Palaeobot Palynol 117:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyvärinen H (1975) Absolute and relative pollen diagrams from northernmost Fennoscandia. Fennia 142:5–23Google Scholar
  26. Hyvärinen H (1976) Flandrian pollen depostition rates and tree-line history in northern Fennoscandia. Boreas 5:163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen C, Vorren KD, Mørkved B (2007) Annual pollen accumulation rate (PAR) at the boreal and alpine forest-line of north-western Norway, with special emphasis on Pinus sylvestris and Betula pubescens. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 144:337–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lid J, Lid DT (2005) Norsk flora, 7th edn. Det Norske Samlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  29. Lisitsyna OV, Giesecke T, Hicks S (2011) Exploring pollen percentage threshold values as an indication for the regional presence of major European trees. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 166:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lisitsyna OV, Hicks S, Huusko A (2012) Do moss samples, pollen traps and modern lake sediments all collect pollen in the same way? A comparison from the forest limit area of northernmost Europe. Veget Hist Archaeobot 21:187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peck RM (1972) Efficiency tests on Tauber trap used as a pollen sampler in turbulent water flow. New Phytol 71:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Punt W et al (1976–95) The northwest European pollen flora, vol 7. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  33. Seppä H (1996) Post-glacial dynamics of vegetation and tree-lines in the far north of Fennoscandia. Fennia 174:1–96Google Scholar
  34. Seppä H, Hicks S (2006) Integration of modern and past pollen accumulation rate (PAR) records across the arctic tree-line: a method for more precise vegetation reconstructions. Quat Sci Rev 25:1501–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seppä H, Nyman M, Korhola A, Weckström J (2002) Changes of treelines and alpine vegetation in relation to post-glacial climate dynamics in northern Fennoscandia based on pollen and chironomid records. J Quat Sci 17:287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shimwell DW (1972) Description and classification of vegetation. Sidgwick and Jackson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Stockmarr J (1971) Tablets with spores used in absolute pollen analysis. Pollen Spores 13:615–621Google Scholar
  38. Sugita S (1994) Pollen representation of vegetation in Quaternary sediments—theory and method in patchy vegetation. J Ecol 82:881–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tauber H (1965) Differential pollen dispersion and the interpretation of pollen diagrams. Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse II Række 89:1–69Google Scholar
  40. Van der Knaap WO, Van Leeuwen JFN, Ammann B (2001) Seven years of annual pollen influx at the forest limit in the Swiss Alps studied by pollen traps: relations to vegetation and climate. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 117:31–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Uni ClimateUni Research AS and Bjerknes Centre for Climate ResearchBergenNorway
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations