Vegetation History and Archaeobotany

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 141–152 | Cite as

The archaeobotanical significance of immature millet grains: an experimental case study of Chinese millet crop processing

Original Article


We present evidence from ethnography and experimental processing of foxtail millet (Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.) in China that spikelets containing incompletely filled (or immature) grains constitute a significant portion of typical millet harvests and are removed along with other by-products after threshing and winnowing. This study provides a baseline for the identification of immature foxtail grains in archaeobotanical assemblages. Immature millet grains are a frequent component of archaeobotanical assemblages in Neolithic and Bronze Age China, and criteria for their recognition are presented based on our modern experimental result and illustrated with archaeobotanical examples from Shandong and Henan. It is seed morphology rather than size that plays a determinative role in the identification of foxtail millet. It is suggested that those grains with a narrow egg-shaped embryo, which is about 5/6 of the whole grain, and having a round shape can be classed as foxtail millet even though they are small, flat and squashed. While different grades of immaturity in millet grains might be defined, the interpretative potential of these appears to be negligible as all immature grains are concentrated in winnowing waste. This study confirms the suggestion that the ratio of immature to mature millet grains can be employed in archaeobotany in considering whether or not early stage crop processing (threshing and winnowing) contributed to the formation of particular archaeological millet assemblages.


Setaria italica Panicum miliaceum China Neolithic Identification criteria Experimental archaeology 


  1. Abé Y (2007) Le “décorticage” du riz. Typologie, repartition géographique et histoire des instruments à monder le riz. Édition de la Maison des sciences de l’homme, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin DF (2006) Fox-tail millets (Setaria: Poaceae) abandoned foods in two hemispheres. Econ Bot 60:143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bray F (1984) Science and civilisation in China, Volume 6. Part II: agriculture. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawford GW, Zhao Z, Luan F, Yu H, Fang H, Cai F, Underhill A, Lee G-A, Feinman G, Nicholas L (2004) Liangchengzhen Yizhi Chutu Longshan Wenhua Zhiwu Yicun de Chubu Fenxi [A preliminary analysis of the Longshan Culture plant remains from the Liangchengzhen site in Rizhao city, Shandong]. Kaogu (Archaeology) 2004(9):73–80 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Crawford GW, Underhill A, Zhao Z, Lee GA, Feinman G, Nicholas L, Luan F, Yu H, Fang H, Cai F (2005) Late Neolithic plant remains from Northern China: preliminary results from Liangchenzhen, Shandong. Curr Anthropol 46:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Andrea C, Lyon D, Haile M, Butler A (1999) Ethnoarchaeological approaches to the study of prehistoric agriculture in the Highlands of Ethiopia. In: Van der Veen M (ed) The exploration of plant resources in ancient Africa. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 101–122Google Scholar
  7. Fuller DQ (2002) Fifty years of archaeobotanical studies in India: laying a solid foundation. In: Settar S, Korisettar R (eds) Indian archaeology in retrospect, vol 3. Archaeology and interactive disciplines. Manohar, New Delhi, pp 247–364Google Scholar
  8. Fuller DQ, Qin L (2008) Immature rice and its archaeobotanical recognition: a reply to Pan. Antiquity 86(312). On-line project gallery.
  9. Fuller DQ, Stevens C (2009) Agriculture and the development of complex societies: an archaeobotanical agenda. In: Fairbairn AS, Weiss E (eds) From foragers to farmers: papers in honour of Gordon C. Hillman. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 37–57Google Scholar
  10. Fuller DQ, Weber SA (2005) Formation processes and palaeoethnobotanical interpretation in South Asia. J Interdiscip Stud Hist Archaeol 2:93–115Google Scholar
  11. Fuller DQ, Zhang H (2007) A preliminary report of the survey archaeobotany of the upper Ying Valley (Henan Province). In: School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University and Henan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology (eds) Dengfeng wangchenggang yizhi de faxian yu yanjiu [Archaeological discovery and research at the Wangchenggang Site in Dengfeng (2002–2005)]. Great Elephant Publisher, Zhengzhou, pp 916–958 (in Chinese and English)Google Scholar
  12. Fuller DQ, Harvy E, Qin L (2007) Presumed domestication? Evidence for wild rice cultivation and domestication in the fifth millennium BC of the Lower Yangtze region. Antiquity 81:316–331Google Scholar
  13. Fuller DQ, Qin L, Harvey E (2008) Evidence for a late onset of agriculture in the Lower Yangtze region and challenges for an archaeobotany of rice. In: Sanchez-Mazas A, Blench R, Ross MD, Peiros I, Lin M (eds) Past human migrations in East Asia: matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics. Routledge, London, pp 40–83Google Scholar
  14. Ge W, Liu L, Jin Z (2010) Morphological analyses on starch granules of five grass species and their significance in archaeology. Disiji Yanjiu (Quat Sci) 30:377–384 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Harvey EL, Fuller DQ (2005) Investigating crop processing through phytolith analysis: the case of rice and millets. J Archaeol Sci 32:739–752Google Scholar
  16. Hubbard RNLB (1992) Dichotomous keys for the identification of the major old world crops. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 73:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunt HV, Linden MV, Liu X, Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute G, Colledge S, Jones MK (2008) Millets across Eurasia: chronology and context of early records of the genera Panicum and Setaria from archaeological sites in the Old World. Veget Hist Archaeobot 17:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Körber-Grohne U (1967) Geobotanische Untersuchungen auf der Feddersen Wierde. Steiner, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  19. Kroll HJ (1983) Kastanas. Ausgrabungen in einem Siedlungshügel der Bronze- und Eisenzeit Makedoniens 1975–1979. Prähistorische Archäologie in Südosteuropa. Spiess, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee G-A, Bestel S (2007) Contextual analysis of plant remains at the Erlitou-period Huizui site, Henan, China. Indo-Pac Prehist Assoc Bull 27:49–60Google Scholar
  21. Lee G-A, Crawford GW, Liu L, Chen X (2007) Plants and people from the early Neolithic to Shang periods in north China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1,087–1,092Google Scholar
  22. Liu X (2010) Food webs, subsistence and changing culture: the development of early farming communities in the Chifeng region, north China. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu C, Kong Z (2004) Morphological comparison of foxtail millet and broomcorn millet and its significance in archaeological identification. Kaogu (Archaeology) 2004(8):76–83 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Liu X, Hunt HV, Jones MK (2009) River valleys and foothills: changing archaeological perceptions of north China’s earliest farms. Antiquity 83:82–95Google Scholar
  25. Lu TLD (2006) The occurrence of cereal cultivation in China. Asian Perspect 45:129–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lu H, Zhang J, Wu N, K-b Liu, Xu D et al (2009a) Phytolith analysis for the discrimination of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and common millet (Panicum miliaceum). PLoS ONE 4:e4448. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lu H, Zhang J, Liu K, Wu N, Li Y, Zhou K, Ye M, Zhang T, Zhang H, Yang X, Shen L, Xu D, Li Q (2009b) Earliest domestication of common millet (Panicum miliaceum) in East Asia extended to 10,000 years ago. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:7,367–7,372Google Scholar
  28. Lundström-Baudais K, Rachoud-Schneider AM, Baudais D, Poissonnier B (2002) Le broyage dans la chaîne de transformation du millet (Panicum miliaceum): outils, gestes et écofacts. In: Procopiou H, Treuil R (eds) Moudre et Broyer: I Méthodes. Comité des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques, Paris, pp 155–180Google Scholar
  29. Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute G, Hunt HV, Jones MK (2012) Experimental approaches to understanding variation in grain size in Panicum miliaceum (broomcorn millet) and its relevance for interpreting archaeobotanical assemblages. Veget Hist Archaeobot 21:69–77Google Scholar
  30. Nasu H, Momohara A, Yasuda Y, He J (2007) The occurrence and identification of Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv (foxtail millet) grains from Chengtoushan site (ca. 5800 cal B.P.) in central China, with reference to the domestication centre in Asia. Veget Hist Archaeobot 16:481–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nesbitt M, Summer GD (1988) Some recent discoveries of millet (Panicum miliacerum L. and Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv) at excavations in Turkey and Iran. Anatol Stud 38:85–97Google Scholar
  32. Percival J (1946) Agricultural botany: theoretical and practical, 8th edn. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Reddy SN (1997) If the threshing floor could talk: integration of agriculture and pastoralism during the Late Harappan in Gujarat, India. J Anthropol Archaeol 16:162–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reddy SN (2003) Discerning palates of the past: an ethnoarchaeological study of crop cultivation and plant usage in India. Ethnoarchaeological series 5, international monographs in prehistory. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson GB (1996) The excavations of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in central Thailand, volume IV: subsistence and environment: the botanical evidence. The biological remains (Part II). Oxbow Books, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang X, Lu H, Liu D, Han J (2005) The comparative research on the starches of Setaria italica, Panicum miliaceum and Setaria viridis and the potential meaning in archaeobotanical study. Disiji Yanjiu (Quat Sci) 25:224–227 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Yang X, Zhang J, Perry L, Ma Z, Wan Z, Li M, Dao X, Lu H (2012a) From the modern to the archaeological: starch grains from millets and their wild relatives in China. J Archaeol Sci 39:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang X, Wan Z, Perry L, Lu H, Wang Q, Zhao C, Li J, Xie F, Yu J, Cui T, Wang T, Li M, Ge Q (2012b) Early millet use in northern China. Proc Natl Acad Sci Online. doi:10.1073/pnas.1115430109 Google Scholar
  39. Yü Y-S (1977) Han. In: Chang K-C (ed) Food in Chinese culture. Anthropological and historical perspectives. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 53–83Google Scholar
  40. Zhang H, Bevan A, Fuller DQ, Fang YM (2010) Archaeobotanical and GIS-based approaches to prehistoric agriculture in the upper Ying Valley, Henan, China. J Archaeol Sci 37:1,480–1,489Google Scholar
  41. Zhao Z (2011) New archaeobotanic data for the study of the origins of agriculture in China. Curr Anthropol 52:S295–S306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of ArchaeologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Institute of ArchaeologyChinese Academy of Social SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.School of History and Culture (Tourism)Sichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations