Vegetation History and Archaeobotany

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 459–470 | Cite as

Bolboschoenus glaucus (Lam.) S.G. Smith, a new species in the flora of the ancient Near East

  • Michèle M. Wollstonecroft
  • Zdenka Hroudová
  • Gordon C. Hillman
  • Dorian Q. Fuller
Original Article

Abstract

Taxonomic advancement in the genus Bolboschoenus (Cyperaceae, formerly included in the genus Scirpus) have resulted in the re-classification of the plant previously known as Bolboschoenus maritimus (synonym Scirpus maritimus) into several closely-related but distinct Bolboschoenus species This improved taxonomy is of importance for archaeobotanical investigations of ancient sites within the temperate zones, where this genus frequently occurs, because it allows more precise definitions of the ecological requirements and growing habits of each species. Moreover, it details the distinct morphological and anatomical characteristics of the fruit (nutlets) of each species. Using these new nutlet classification criteria, we re-examined charred archaeological specimens which had previously been identified as B. maritimus (or S. maritimus), from five Near Eastern late Pleistocene and early Holocene village sites: Abu Hureyra, Hallan Çemi, Demirköy, Çatalhöyük and Aswad. Because three of these sites are located in Anatolia, data on the recent occurrence of Bolboschoenus in Turkey were also investigated. All archaeobotanical specimens were found to be B. glaucus. This species was also found to be the most common Bolboschoenus in present-day Turkey, indicating that it has a long history of occurrence in this region. The environmental, ecological and economic implications of this new information suggest that it is entirely feasible that this plant provided late Pleistocene and Holocene Near Eastern people with a dependable and possibly a staple food source.

Keywords

Bolboschoenus glaucus Epipalaeolithic Near East Neolithic Taxonomy Nutlet characteristics 

Supplementary material

334_2011_305_MOESM1_ESM.doc (54 kb)
Supplementary material 1: Appendix Lists of examined Bolboschoenus maritimus and B. glaucus herbarium specimens and their localities in Turkey (DOC 54 kb)

References

  1. Amini Rad M, Hroudová Z, Marhold K (2010) The genus Bolboschoenus in Iran: taxonomy and distribution. Nordic J Bot 28:588–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Browning J, Gordon-Gray KD (1993) Studies in Cyperaceae in Southern Africa. 21: the taxonomic significance of the achene and its embryo in Bolboschoenus. S Afr J Bot 59:311–318Google Scholar
  3. Browning J, Gordon-Gray KD (2000) Patterns of fruit morphology in Bolboschoenus (Cyperaceae) and their global distribution. S Afr J Bot 66:63–71Google Scholar
  4. Browning J, Gordon-Gray KD, Smith SG, van Staden J (1996) Bolboschoenus yagara (Cyperaceae) newly reported for Europe. Ann Bot Fenn 33:129–136Google Scholar
  5. Browning J, Gordon-Gray KD, Smith SG, van Staden J (1997) Bolboschoenus maritimus s.l. in The Netherlands: a study of pericarp anatomy based on the work of Irene Robertus-Koster. Ann Bot Fenn 34:115–126Google Scholar
  6. Browning J, Gordon-Gray KD, Smith SG, van Staden J (1998) Bolboschoenus glaucus (Cyperaceae), with emphasis upon Africa. Nordic J Bot 18:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casper SJ, Krausch HD (1980) Pteridophyta und Anthophyta. 1. Teil: Lycopodiaceae bis Orchidaceae.—Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd 23, Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai L, Liang S, Zhang S, Tang Y, Koyama T, Tucker G, Simpson D, Noltie H, Strong M, Bruhl J, Wilson K, Muasya A (2010) Cyperaceae. In: Wu Z, Raven P (eds) Flora of China, Volume 23. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, pp 164–461Google Scholar
  9. Danin A (2000) The nomenclature news of Flora Palaestina. Flora Mediterranea 10:109–172Google Scholar
  10. Davis PH (ed) (1985) The Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 9. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  11. DeFilipps RA (1980) Scirpus L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walter SM, Webb DA (eds) Flora Europaea, vol 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 277–280Google Scholar
  12. Fairbairn A, Asouti E, Near J, Martinoli D (2002) Macro-botanical evidence for plant use at Neolithic Çatalhöyük south-central Anatolia, Turkey. Veget Hist Archaeobot 11:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feinbrun-Dothan N (1981) Flora Palaestina, Part 4: Alismataceae to Orchidaceae. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernald ML (1950) Gray’s manual of botany. American Book Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Goetghebeur P, Simpson DA (1991) Critical notes on Actinoscirpus, Bolboschoenus, Isolepis, Phylloscirpus and Amphiscirpus (Cyperaceae). Kew Bull 46:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haines HA, Lye KA (1983) The sedges and grasses of East Africa. East African Natural History Society, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  17. Harlan JR (1972) Crops that extend the range of agricultural settlement. In: Ucko PJ, Dimbleby GW, Tringham R (eds) Man, settlement and urbanism. Duckworth, London, pp 239–243Google Scholar
  18. Hillman GC (1975) The plant remains from Tell Abu Hureyra: a preliminary report. In: Moore AMT (ed) The excavation of Tell Abu Hureyra in Syria: a preliminary report. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 41:50–77Google Scholar
  19. Hillman GC (2000) The plant food economy of Abu Hureyra 1 and 2. In: Moore AMT, Hillman GC, Legge AJ (eds) Village on the Euphrates: from foraging to farming at Abu Hureyra. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 327–398Google Scholar
  20. Hillman GC, Colledge SM, Harris DR (1989a) Plant-food economy during the Epipalaeolithic period at Tell Abu Hureyra, Syria: dietary diversity, seasonality, and modes of exploitation. In: Harris DR, Hillman GC (eds) Foraging and farming: the evolution of plant exploitation. Unwin Hyman, London, pp 240–268Google Scholar
  21. Hillman GC, Madeyska E, Hather JG (1989b) Wild plant foods and diet at Late Palaeolithic Wadi Kubbaniya (Upper Egypt): evidence from charred remains. In: Wendorf F, Schild R, Close A (eds) The prehistory of Wadi Kubbaniya, vol 2: Stratigraphy, subsistence and environment. Southern Methodist University, Dallas, pp 162–242Google Scholar
  22. Hillman GC, Hedges R, Moore A, Colledge S, Pettitt P (2001) New evidence of lateglacial cereal cultivation at Abu Hureyra on the Euphrates. Holocene 11:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hroudová Z, Zákravský P (1995) Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.) Palla—tuber production and dormancy in natural habitats. In: Oborny B, Podani J (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International workshop on clonal plants, clonality in plant communities, Visegrád, Hungary, April 18–22, 1995, Budapest. Abstracta Botanica 19:89–94Google Scholar
  24. Hroudová Z, Marhold K, Zákravský P, Ducháček M (2001) The genus Bolboschoenus in the Czech Republic. Zprávy Čes Bot Společ Praha 36:1–28Google Scholar
  25. Hroudová Z, Zákravský P, Ducháček M, Marhold K (2007) Taxonomy distribution and ecology of Bolboschoenus in Europe. Ann Bot Fennici 44:81–102Google Scholar
  26. Hroudová Z, Gregor T, Zákravský P (2009) Die Verbreitung von Bolboschoenus-Arten in Deutschland. Kochia 4:1–22Google Scholar
  27. Kantrud HA (1996) The alkali (Scirpus maritimus L.) and saltmarsh (S. robustus Pursh) bulrushes: a literature review. US Dept of the Interior National Biological Service Technical Report Series, DenverGoogle Scholar
  28. Kubiak-Martens L (1999) The plant food component of the diet at the Late Mesolithic (Ertebølle) settlement at Tybrind Vig, Denmark. Veget Hist Archaeobot 8:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kukkonen I (1996) Notes of the treatment of Cyperaceae for Flora Iranica. Ann Naturhist Mus Wien 98B:87–95Google Scholar
  30. Mabey R (1996) Flora Britannica: the definitive new guide to wild flowers, plants and trees. Sinclair-Stevenson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Mouterde P (1966) Nouvelle flore du Liban et de la Syrie. Dar El-Machreq (Imprimerie Catholique), BeirutGoogle Scholar
  32. Nadkarni AK (1954) Indian materia medica. Popular Book Depot, BombayGoogle Scholar
  33. Norlindh T (1972) Notes on the variation and taxonomy in Scirpus maritimus complex. Bot Notiser 125:397–405Google Scholar
  34. Ohwi J (1944) Cyperaceae Japonicae II. Mem Coll Sci Kyoto Univ, Ser B 18:1–182Google Scholar
  35. Rechinger KH (ed) (1998) Flora Iranica. Akad Druck-Verlaganstalt, GrazGoogle Scholar
  36. Reimbold G, Eling P, Kingma A, La Heij W, Fasotti L, Landmann G, Reimer A, Lemcke G, Kempe S (1996) Dating Late Glacial abrupt climate changes in the 14,570 year long continuous varve record of Lake Van, Turkey. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 122:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Savard M, Nesbitt M, Jones MK (2006) The role of wild grasses in subsistence and sedentism: new evidence from the northern Fertile Crescent. World Archaeology 38:179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schultze-Motel W (1980) Scirpus maritimus L. In: Hegi G (ed) Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, Band II, Teil 1–Monocotyledones 2. Berlin, Hamburg, pp 18–20Google Scholar
  39. Smith SG (1995) New combinations in North American Schoenoplectus, Bolboschoenus, Isolepis and Trichophorum (Cyperaceae). Novon 5:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Strong MT (1993) New combinations in Schoenoplectus (Cyperaceae). Novon 3:202–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Strong MT (1994) Taxonomy of Scirpus, Trichophorum, and Schoenoplectus (Cyperaceae) in Virginia. Bartonia 58:29–68Google Scholar
  42. Sussex Wildlife Trust (2002) Sussex Wildlife Trust nature reserves. Published online: www.wildlifetrust.org.uk/sussex/reserves.htm
  43. Täckholm V, Drar M (1950) The Flora of Egypt, vol 2, Cyperaceae to Juncaceae. Fouad I University Press, CairoGoogle Scholar
  44. Tanaka T (1976) Tanaka’s encyclopaedia of edible plants of the world. Keigaku Publishing, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  45. Tatanov IV (2004a) Infrageneric system of the genus Bolboschoenus (Aschers.) Palla (Cyperaceae) [in Russian]. Novitates System Plant Vascul 36:80–95Google Scholar
  46. Tatanov IV (2004b) The comparative carpology of Bolboschoenus (Cyperaceae) in the context of the genus taxonomy [in Russian, with English summary]. Bot Zhurn 89:1,225–1,248Google Scholar
  47. Tatanov IV (2007) Taxonomic survey of the genus Bolboschoenus (Aschers.) Palla (Cyperaceae) [in Russian]. Novitates System Plant Vascul 39:46–149Google Scholar
  48. Thompson J (2001) SHYLOC UK Sites. Research Project published online: www.geog.ucl.ac.uk/~jthompso/shyloc_sites.htm
  49. Townsend CC, Guest E (1985) Flora of Iraq, vol 8: Monocotyledons. Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform, BaghdadGoogle Scholar
  50. Turner NJ (1998) Plant technology of First Peoples in British Columbia. University of British Columbia and the Royal British Columbia Museum, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Zeist W (1972) Palaeobotanical results of the 1970 season at Çayönü, Turkey. Helinium 12:3–19Google Scholar
  52. Van Zeist W, Bakker-Heeres JAH (1979) Some economic and ecological aspects of the plant husbandry of Tell Aswad. In: de Contenson H, Cauvin M-C, van Zeist W, Bakker-Heeres JAH, Leroi-Gourhan A (eds) Tell Aswad (Damascene). Paléorient 5:119–174Google Scholar
  53. Van Zeist W, Bakker-Heeres JAH (1982) Archaeobotanical studies in the Levant 1. Neolithic sites in the Damascus basin: Aswad, Ghoraifé, Ramad. Palaeohistoria 24:165–256Google Scholar
  54. Van Zeist W, Bakker-Heeres JAH (1984) Archaeobotanical studies in the Levant 3: Late Palaeolithic Mureybit. Palaeohistoria 26:171–199Google Scholar
  55. Wollstonecroft M (2009) Harvesting experiments on the clonal macrophyte sea club-rush (Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.) Palla): an approach to identifying variables that may have influenced hunter-gatherer resource selection in Late Pleistocene Southwest Asia. In: Fairbairn AS, Weiss E (eds) From foragers to farmers: papers in honour of Gordon C. Hillman. Oxbow Monographs, Oxford, pp 127–139Google Scholar
  56. Wollstonecroft M, Erkal A (1999) Summary of plant-processing experiments 1999. In: Hodder I, Catalhöyük Research Trust (eds) Catalhöyük 1999 Archive Report, www.catalhoyuk.com/archive_reports/1999/index.html
  57. Wollstonecroft M, Ellis PR, Hillman GC, Fuller DQ (2008) Advancements in plant food processing in the Near Eastern Epipalaeolithic and implications for improved edibility and nutrient bioaccessibility: an experimental assessment of sea club-rush (Bolboschoenus maritimus (L) Palla). Veget Hist Archaeobot 17(1):S19–S27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michèle M. Wollstonecroft
    • 1
  • Zdenka Hroudová
    • 2
  • Gordon C. Hillman
    • 1
  • Dorian Q. Fuller
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of ArchaeologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Institute of BotanyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPrůhoniceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations