References
Veenhuizen SGA, de Lange SV, Bakker MF et al (2021) Supplemental breast MRI for women with extremely dense breasts: results of the second screening round of the DENSE trial. Radiology 299:278–286
Bakker MF, de Lange SV, Pijnappel RM et al (2019) Supplemental MRI screening for women with extremely dense breast tissue. N Engl J Med 381:2091–2102
Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM et al (2010) Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology 254:79–87
Veenhuizen SGA, van Grinsven SEL, Laseur IL et al (2024) Re-attendance in supplemental breast MRI screening rounds of the DENSE trial among women with extremely dense breasts. Eur Radiol 381:2091–2102
Son D, Phillips J, Mehta TS, Mehta R, Brook A, Dialani VM (2022) Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening. Acad Radiol 29:S229–S238
DenseBreast-info.org (2024) https://densebreast-info.org/for-patients/. Accessed March 30, 2024
Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Lee CS, Destounis SV (2023) Breast cancer screening for women at higher-than-average risk: updated recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol 20:902–914
Kuhl CK, Gatsonis C, Newstead G et al (2023) Incidence round screening performance among women with dense breasts undergoing abbreviated breast MRI and digital breast tomosynthesis (ECOG-ACRIN EA1141). J Clin Oncol 41
Berg WA, Bandos AI, Sava MG (2023) Analytic hierarchy process analysis of patient preferences for contrast-enhanced mammography versus MRI as supplemental screening options for breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 20:758–768
Berg WA (2021) BI-RADS 3 on screening breast ultrasound: what is it and what is the appropriate management? J Breast Imaging 3:527–538
Funding
The author receives grant funding from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, BCRF 2023-015, and the Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Coalition.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Wendie A. Berg.
Conflict of interest
WAB discloses consulting with Exai Bio, Inc., and research grant support to her institution from Koios Medical, Inc. She is a voluntary Chief Scientific Advisor to DenseBreast-info.org and a voluntary Associate Editor to the Journal of Breast Imaging.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was not required.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was not required.
Study subjects or cohorts overlap
Not applicable.
Methodology
-
Commentary
Additional information
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10685-9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berg, W.A. Why don’t all women with extremely dense breasts want MRI screening?. Eur Radiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10773-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10773-w