Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perspectives and limitations of Lung-RADS in different target populations: the power of systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Commentary
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 30 August 2023

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (n.d.) Fact sheets by cancer [Internet] Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available from https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/15-Lung-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed 03 Jul 2023

  2. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 365(5):395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Black W et al (2015) Performance of Lung-RADS in the national lung screening trial: A retrospective assessment. Ann Intern Med. 162(7):485–491

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee J, Lim J, Kim Y et al (2019) Development of protocol for Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project (K-LUCAS) to Evaluate Effectiveness and Feasibility to Implement National Cancer Screening Program. Cancer Res Treat. 51:1285–1294

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mao Y, Cai J, Heuvelmans MA et al (2023) Performance of Lung-RADS in different target populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10049-9

  6. Patz EF Jr, Greco E, Gatsonis C et al (2016) Lung cancer incidence and mortality in National Lung Screening Trial participants who underwent low-dose CT prevalence screening: a retrospective cohort analysis of a randomised, multicentre, diagnostic screening trial. Lancet Oncol. 17(5):590–599

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yankelevitz D, Henschke C (2016) Lung cancer: Low-dose CT screening - determining the right interval. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 13(9):533–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author states that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome – Academic Diagnostic Imaging Division, I.C.O.T. Hospital, Via Franco Faggiana 1668, 04100, Latina, LT, Italy

    Simone Vicini

Authors
  1. Simone Vicini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Vicini.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Simone Vicini.

Conflict of interest

The author of this manuscript declares no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was not required for this commentary.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was not required for this commentary.

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

Not applicable.

Methodology

  • Commentary

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10049-9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vicini, S. Perspectives and limitations of Lung-RADS in different target populations: the power of systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 34, 1875–1876 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10156-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10156-7

Search

Navigation