Abstract
Objective
Bioabsorbable magnesium-based alloy screws release gas upon resorption. The resulting findings in the adjacent soft tissues and joints may mimic infection. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ultrasound (US) findings in soft tissues and joints during screw resorption.
Methods
Prospectively acquired US studies from pediatric patients treated with magnesium screws were evaluated for screw head visibility, posterior acoustic shadowing, twinkling artifact, foreign body granuloma, gas (soft tissue, intra-articular), alterations of the skin and subcutaneous fat, perifascial fluid, localized fluid collections, hypervascularization, and joint effusion.
Results
Sixty-six US studies of 28 pediatric patients (nfemale = 9, nmale = 19) were included. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 10.84 years; the mean time between surgery and ultrasound was 128.3 days (range = 6–468 days). The screw head and posterior acoustic shadowing were visible in 100% of the studies, twinkling artifact in 6.1%, foreign body granuloma in 92.4%, gas locules in soft tissue in 100% and intra-articular in 18.2%, hyperechogenicity of the subcutaneous fat in 90.9%, cobblestoning of the subcutaneous fat in 24.2%, loss of normal differentiation between the epidermis/dermis and the subcutaneous fat in 57.6%, localized fluid collection in 9.9%, perifascial fluid in 12.1%, hypervascularization in 27.3%, and joint effusion in 18.2%.
Conclusion
US findings in pediatric patients treated with magnesium screws strongly resemble infection, but are normal findings in the setting of screw resorption.
Clinical relevance statement
Bioabsorbable magnesium-based alloy screws release gas during resorption. The resulting US findings in the adjacent soft tissues and joints in pediatric patients may mimic infection, but are normal findings.
Key Points
• Bioabsorbable magnesium-based alloy screws release gas upon resorption.
• The resulting ultrasound findings in children’s soft tissues and joints closely resemble those of soft tissue infection or osteosynthesis-associated infection.
• Be familiar with these ultrasound findings in order to avoid inadvertently misdiagnosing a soft tissue infection or osteosynthesis-associated infection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GLM:
-
Generalized linear model
- MHz:
-
Megahertz
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- US:
-
Ultrasound
References
Grun NG, Holweg PL, Donohue N, Klestil T, Weinberg AM (2018) Resorbable implants in pediatric fracture treatment. Innov Surg Sci 3:119–125
Qiu X, Deng H, Su Q et al (2022) Epidemiology and management of 10,486 pediatric fractures in Shenzhen: experience and lessons to be learnt. BMC Pediatr 22:161
Westerkamp AC, de Geus AF, Molenbuur B et al (2018) Comparing peri-operative complications of paediatric and adult anaesthesia: a retrospective cohort study of 81 267 cases. Eur J Anaesthesiol 35:280–288
Lei S, Ko R, Sun LS (2018) Neurocognitive impact of anesthesia in children. Adv Anesth 36:125–137
Zhang E, Xu L, Yu G, Pan F, Yang K (2009) In vivo evaluation of biodegradable magnesium alloy bone implant in the first 6 months implantation. J Biomed Mater Res A 90:882–893
Witte F, Kaese V, Haferkamp H et al (2005) In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response. Biomaterials 26:3557–3563
Heye P, Matissek C, Seidl C et al (2022) Making hardware removal unnecessary by using resorbable implants for osteosynthesis in children. Children (Basel) 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/children9040471
Baldini M, Coppa V, Falcioni D, Senigagliesi E, Marinelli M, Gigante AP (2021) Use of resorbable magnesium screws in children: systematic review of the literature and short-term follow-up from our series. J Child Orthop 15:194–203
Kozakiewicz M (2020) Are magnesium screws proper for mandibular condyle head osteosynthesis? Materials (Basel) 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112641
Jungesblut OD, Moritz M, Spiro AS, Stuecker R, Rupprecht M (2021) Fixation of unstable osteochondritis dissecans lesions and displaced osteochondral fragments using new biodegradable magnesium pins in adolescents. Cartilage 13:302S-310S
Sturznickel J, Delsmann MM, Jungesblut OD et al (2021) Safety and performance of biodegradable magnesium-based implants in children and adolescents. Injury 52:2265–2271
Choo JT, Lai SHS, Tang CQY, Thevendran G (2019) Magnesium-based bioabsorbable screw fixation for hallux valgus surgery - a suitable alternative to metallic implants. Foot Ankle Surg 25:727–732
Leonhardt H, Franke A, McLeod NMH, Lauer G, Nowak A (2017) Fixation of fractures of the condylar head of the mandible with a new magnesium-alloy biodegradable cannulated headless bone screw. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:623–625
Windhagen H, Radtke K, Weizbauer A et al (2013) Biodegradable magnesium-based screw clinically equivalent to titanium screw in hallux valgus surgery: short term results of the first prospective, randomized, controlled clinical pilot study. Biomed Eng Online 12:62
Li ZH, Yu AX, Guo XP, Qi BW, Zhou M, Wang WY (2013) Absorbable implants versus metal implants for the treatment of ankle fractures: a meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 5:1531–1537
Polat O, Toy S, Kibar B (2021) Surgical outcomes of scaphoid fracture osteosynthesis with magnesium screws. Jt Dis Relat Surg 32:721–728
Acar B, Kose O, Turan A, Unal M, Kati YA, Guler F (2018) Comparison of bioabsorbable magnesium versus titanium screw fixation for modified distal chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus. Biomed Res Int 2018:5242806
Acar B, Kose O, Unal M, Turan A, Kati YA, Guler F (2020) Comparison of magnesium versus titanium screw fixation for biplane chevron medial malleolar osteotomy in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 30:163–173
Plaass C, Ettinger S, Sonnow L et al (2016) Early results using a biodegradable magnesium screw for modified chevron osteotomies. J Orthop Res 34:2207–2214
Plaass C, von Falck C, Ettinger S et al (2018) Bioabsorbable magnesium versus standard titanium compression screws for fixation of distal metatarsal osteotomies - 3 year results of a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sci 23:321–327
May H, Alper Kati Y, Gumussuyu G, Yunus Emre T, Unal M, Kose O (2020) Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures. J Orthop Traumatol 21:9
Waelti SL, Markart S, Willems EP et al (2022) Radiographic features of magnesium-based bioabsorbable screw resorption in paediatric fractures. Pediatr Radiol 52(12):2368–2376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05383-x
Waizy H, Diekmann J, Weizbauer A et al (2014) In vivo study of a biodegradable orthopedic screw (MgYREZr-alloy) in a rabbit model for up to 12 months. J Biomater Appl 28:667–675
Delsmann MM, Sturznickel J, Kertai M, Stucker R, Rolvien T, Rupprecht M (2023) Radiolucent zones of biodegradable magnesium-based screws in children and adolescents-a radiographic analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:2297–2305
Sonnow L, Ziegler A, Pohler GH et al (2022) Alterations in magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of bioabsorbable magnesium screws over time in humans: a retrospective single center study. Innov Surg Sci 6:105–113
Sonnow L, Konneker S, Vogt PM, Wacker F, von Falck C (2017) Biodegradable magnesium Herbert screw - image quality and artifacts with radiography, CT and MRI. BMC Med Imaging 17:16
Sun Y, Helmholz H, Will O et al (2022) Dynamic in vivo monitoring of fracture healing process in response to magnesium implant with multimodal imaging: pilot longitudinal study in a rat external fixation model. Biomater Sci 10(6):1532–1543. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2bm00051b
Filli L, Luechinger R, Frauenfelder T et al (2015) Metal-induced artifacts in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of a biodegradable magnesium alloy versus titanium and stainless steel controls. Skeletal Radiol 44:849–856
Davae KC, Sofka CM, DiCarlo E, Adler RS (2003) Value of power Doppler imaging and the hypoechoic halo in the sonographic detection of foreign bodies: correlation with histopathologic findings. J Ultrasound Med 22:1309–1313 (quiz 1314-1306)
Carneiro BC, Cruz IAN, Chemin RN et al (2020) Multimodality imaging of foreign bodies: new insights into old challenges. Radiographics 40:1965–1986
Ingraham CR, Mannelli L, Robinson JD, Linnau KF (2015) Radiology of foreign bodies: how do we image them? Emerg Radiol 22:425–430
Boyse TD, Fessell DP, Jacobson JA, Lin J, van Holsbeeck MT, Hayes CW (2001) US of soft-tissue foreign bodies and associated complications with surgical correlation. Radiographics 21:1251–1256
Jarraya M, Hayashi D, de Villiers RV et al (2014) Multimodality imaging of foreign bodies of the musculoskeletal system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:W92-102
Shiels WE 2nd, Babcock DS, Wilson JL, Burch RA (1990) Localization and guided removal of soft-tissue foreign bodies with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:1277–1281
Jacobson JA, Powell A, Craig JG, Bouffard JA, van Holsbeeck MT (1998) Wooden foreign bodies in soft tissue: detection at US. Radiology 206:45–48
Dillman JR, Kappil M, Weadock WJ et al (2011) Sonographic twinkling artifact for renal calculus detection: correlation with CT. Radiology 259:911–916
Kim HC, Yang DM, Jin W, Ryu JK, Shin HC (2010) Color Doppler twinkling artifacts in various conditions during abdominal and pelvic sonography. J Ultrasound Med 29:621–632
De Maeseneer M, Jacobson JA, Jaovisidha S et al (1998) Elbow effusions: distribution of joint fluid with flexion and extension and imaging implications. Invest Radiol 33:117–125
Konin GP, Nazarian LN, Walz DM (2013) US of the elbow: indications, technique, normal anatomy, and pathologic conditions. Radiographics 33:E125-147
Martinoli C (2010) Musculoskeletal ultrasound: technical guidelines. Insights Imaging 1:99–141
Marin JR, Dean AJ, Bilker WB, Panebianco NL, Brown NJ, Alpern ER (2013) Emergency ultrasound-assisted examination of skin and soft tissue infections in the pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 20:545–553
Altmayer S, Verma N, Dicks EA, Oliveira A (2020) Imaging musculoskeletal soft tissue infections. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 41:85–98
Nelson CE, Chen AE, Bellah RD et al (2018) Ultrasound features of purulent skin and soft tissue infection without abscess. Emerg Radiol 25:505–511
Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363
Grosjean P, Ibanez F (2018) pastecs: package for analysis of space-time ecological series. R package version 1.3.21. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pastecs/index.html
Revelle W (2022) psych: procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University, Evanston
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. Package version 3.3.6
RCoreTeam (2022) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
S FJaW (2019) An (R) Companion to applied regression, Third Edition, Version 3.1-0, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage
K B (2022) MuMIn: multi-model inference. Version 1.47.1 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290
Witte F (2010) The history of biodegradable magnesium implants: a review. Acta Biomater 6:1680–1692
Staiger MP, Pietak AM, Huadmai J, Dias G (2006) Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review. Biomaterials 27:1728–1734
Lim HK, Byun SH, Woo JM et al (2017) Biocompatibility and biocorrosion of hydroxyapatite-coated magnesium plate: animal experiment. Materials (Basel) 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10101149
Farraro KF, Kim KE, Woo SL, Flowers JR, McCullough MB (2014) Revolutionizing orthopaedic biomaterials: the potential of biodegradable and bioresorbable magnesium-based materials for functional tissue engineering. J Biomech 47:1979–1986
Noviana D, Paramitha D, Ulum MF, Hermawan H (2016) The effect of hydrogen gas evolution of magnesium implant on the postimplantation mortality of rats. J Orthop Translat 5:9–15
Myrissa A, Agha NA, Lu Y et al (2016) In vitro and in vivo comparison of binary Mg alloys and pure Mg. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 61:865–874
Castellani C, Lindtner RA, Hausbrandt P et al (2011) Bone-implant interface strength and osseointegration: biodegradable magnesium alloy versus standard titanium control. Acta Biomater 7:432–440
Kraus T, Fischerauer S, Treichler S et al (2018) The influence of biodegradable magnesium implants on the growth plate. Acta Biomater 66:109–117
Espiritu J, Berangi M, Yiannakou C et al (2022) Evaluating metallic artefact of biodegradable magnesium-based implants in magnetic resonance imaging. Bioact Mater 15:382–391
Rubin JM, Adler RS, Bude RO, Fowlkes JB, Carson PL (1991) Clean and dirty shadowing at US: a reappraisal. Radiology 181:231–236
Diekmann J, Bauer S, Weizbauer A et al (2016) Examination of a biodegradable magnesium screw for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a pilot in vivo study in rabbits. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 59:1100–1109
Ezechieli M, Diekmann J, Weizbauer A et al (2014) Biodegradation of a magnesium alloy implant in the intercondylar femoral notch showed an appropriate response to the synovial membrane in a rabbit model in vivo. J Biomater Appl 29:291–302
Acknowledgements
We thank Evelyn Wirth and Kathleen Rüger for their excellent support.
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Stephan L. Waelti.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
Erik P. Willems, one of the authors, has significant statistical expertise (Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Clinical Trials Unit, Biostatistics, St. Gallen, Switzerland).
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients themselves (if 14 years of age or older) or their parents.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Study subjects or cohorts overlap
Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in Waelti, S.L., et al, Radiographic features of magnesium-based bioabsorbable screw resorption in paediatric fractures. Pediatr Radiol, 2022.
The patients prospectively examined by ultrasound in the present study were examined by radiographs during normal fracture follow-up. In this previous study, the radiographs were evaluated retrospectively. The study included 35 patients, including the 28 patients included in the present ultrasound study.
Methodology
• prospective
• observational
• performed at one institution
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Waelti, S.L., Fandak, J., Markart, S. et al. Prospective evaluation of ultrasound features of magnesium-based bioabsorbable screw resorption in pediatric fractures. Eur Radiol 34, 1556–1566 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10091-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10091-7