Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) in patients undergoing conversional hepatectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis

  • Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent hepatic resection after conversion therapy had a high recurrence rate of nearly 90%. Preoperative DEB-TACE has the potential to prevent postoperative recurrence which has not been elucidated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative DEB-TACE.

Materials and methods

Patients with CRLM who underwent liver resection from June 1, 2016, to June 30, 2021, were collected and those who received conversional hepatectomy were included in this study. Patients with preoperative DEB-TACE were propensity-score matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients without preoperative DEB-TACE. Short-term outcomes and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups.

Results

After PSM, 44 patients were included in each group. The toxicities of DEB-TACE were mild and could be managed by conservative treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) of conversion therapy (75.0% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.437) and postoperative complication of hepatic resection (27.3% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.453) were similar between the two groups. The median RFS of the DEB-TACE group (10.7 months, 95%CI: 6.6–14.8 months) was significantly longer than that of the control group (8.1 months, 95%CI: 3.4–12.8 months) (HR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.37–0.95, p = 0.027).

Conclusions

In patients who became resectable after conversion therapy, preoperative DEB-TACE might be a safe option to achieve longer RFS.

Key Points

• This is a propensity-score matching study comparing patients who underwent conversional hepatectomy with or without preoperative DEB-TACE.

• The preoperative DEB-TACE was safe and with mild toxicities (without toxicities more than CTCAE grade 3).

• The preoperative DEB-TACE significantly prolonged the RFS of those patients who underwent conversional hepatectomy (10.7 vs. 8.1 months, p = 0.027).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

CRC:

Colorectal carcinoma

CRLM:

Colorectal liver metastases

CT:

Computed tomography

DEBIRI:

Irinotecan drug-eluting beads

DEB-TACE:

Transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads

DFS:

Disease-free survival

HAI:

Hepatic arterial infusion

LRFS:

Liver recurrence-free survival

MDT:

Multi-disciplinary team

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

ORR:

Overall response rate

PSM:

Propensity-score matching

PVI:

Portal vein infusion

RECIST:

Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors

RFA:

Radiofrequency ablation

RFS:

Recurrence-free survival

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424

  2. Gruber-Rouh T, Naguib NN, Eichler K et al (2014) Transarterial chemoembolization of unresectable systemic chemotherapy-refractory liver metastases from colorectal cancer: long-term results over a 10-year period. Int J Cancer 134:1225–1231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Cervantes A (2010) Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for treatment. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v93–v97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adam R (2003) Chemotherapy and surgery: new perspectives on the treatment of unresectable liver metastases. Ann Oncol 14(Suppl 2):ii13–ii16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maeda Y, Shinohara T, Nagatsu A, Futakawa N, Hamada T (2016) Long-term outcomes of conversion hepatectomy for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 23(Suppl 2):S242–S248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Folprecht G, Gruenberger T, Bechstein W et al (2014) Survival of patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated with FOLFOX/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab in a multidisciplinary concept (CELIM study). Ann Oncol 25:1018–1025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. de Jong MC, Pulitano C, Ribero D et al (2009) Rates and patterns of recurrence following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: an international multi-institutional analysis of 1669 patients. Ann Surg 250:440–448

  8. Mitry E, Fields AL, Bleiberg H et al (2008) Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26:4906–4911

  9. Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B et al (2013) Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:1208–1215

  10. Lorenz M, Müller HH, Schramm H et al (1998) Randomized trial of surgery versus surgery followed by adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for liver metastases of colorectal cancer. German Cooperative on Liver Metastases (Arbeitsgruppe Lebermetastasen). Ann Surg 228:756–762

  11. Kemeny MM, Adak S, Gray B et al (2002) Combined-modality treatment for resectable metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver: surgical resection of hepatic metastases in combination with continuous infusion of chemotherapy--an intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 20:1499–1505

  12. Fielding LP, Hittinger R, Grace RH, Fry JS (1992) Randomised controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy by portal-vein perfusion after curative resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Lancet 340:502–506

  13. Liu Y, Chang W, Zhou B et al (2021) Conventional transarterial chemoembolization combined with systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone as second-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 108:373–379

  14. Melchiorre F, Patella F, Pescatori L et al (2018) DEB-TACE: a standard review. Future Oncol 14:2969–2984

  15. Huppert P, Wenzel T, Wietholtz H (2014) Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) of colorectal cancer liver metastases by irinotecan-eluting microspheres in a salvage patient population. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37:154–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ngo A, von Stempel C, Corbo B et al (2019) Transarterial chemoembolisation of colorectal liver metastases with irinotecan-loaded beads: a bi-institutional analysis of 125 treatments in 53 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 42:979–990

  17. Lv Y, Feng QY, Wei Y et al (2020) Benefits of multi-disciplinary treatment strategy on survival of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Clin Transl Med 10:e121

  18. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

  19. Tang W, Ren L, Liu T et al (2020) Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 versus mFOLFOX6 alone as first-line treatment for RAS mutant unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases: the BECOME Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 38:3175–3184

  20. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH (1999) Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 230:309–318 discussion 318-21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weiser MR (2018) AJCC 8th Edition: Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 25:1454–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamashige S, Arquilla ER (2008) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). Principles and Practice of Clinical Trial Medicine vol 42, pp 461–533

  23. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin RC, Joshi J, Robbins K et al (2011) Hepatic intra-arterial injection of drug-eluting bead, irinotecan (DEBIRI) in unresectable colorectal liver metastases refractory to systemic chemotherapy: results of multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol 18:192–198

  25. Pernot S, Pellerin O, Artru P et al (2020) Intra-arterial hepatic beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) with mFOLFOX6 in unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a phase 2 study. Br J Cancer 123:518–524

  26. Martin RC 2nd, Scoggins CR, Schreeder M et al (2015) Randomized controlled trial of irinotecan drug-eluting beads with simultaneous FOLFOX and bevacizumab for patients with unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastasis. Cancer 121:3649–3658

  27. Akinwande O, Dendy M, Ludwig JM, Kim HS (2017) Hepatic intra-arterial injection of irinotecan drug eluting beads (DEBIRI) for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review. Surg Oncol 26:268–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao G, Liu S, Zhang Y et al (2021) Irinotecan eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization using Callispheres® microspheres is an effective and safe approach in treating unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ir J Med Sci 191:1139–1145

  29. Fiorentini G, Sarti D, Nani R, Aliberti C, Fiorentini C, Guadagni S (2020) Updates of colorectal cancer liver metastases therapy: review on DEBIRI. Hepat Oncol 7:Hep16

  30. Ye L-C, Liu T-S, Ren L et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial of cetuximab plus chemotherapy for patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases. J Clin Oncol 31:1931–1938

  31. Liu M, Wang K, Wang Y et al (2021) Short- and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation for patients with multiple primarily unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a propensity matching analysis. HPB (Oxford) 23:1586–1594

  32. van Amerongen MJ, van der Stok EP, Fütterer JJ et al (2016) Short term and long term results of patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing surgery with or without radiofrequency ablation. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:523–530

  33. Conci S, Ruzzenente A, Pedrazzani C et al (2021) Simultaneous approach for patients with synchronous colon and rectal liver metastases: impact of site of primary on postoperative and oncological outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 47:842–849

  34. Bogach J, Wang J, Griffiths C et al (2020) Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a population-based cohort study. Int J Surg 74:68–75

Download references

Funding

This study has received funding from The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81602035, 81472228, 82072653); The Shanghai Municipal Health Commission: Shanghai Outstanding Youth Specialist Training Program (Q2017-059); Clinical Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shanghai (SHDC12016104); Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive (17DZ2252600); Youth Fund of Zhongshan Hospital (2019ZSQN28).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yu Liu, Bo Zhou, Wentao Tang, and Donghao Xu contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenju Chang or Jianmin Xu.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Jianmin Xu.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

Donghao Xu (one of the authors) kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

  • retrospective (a propensity-score matching analysis)

  • observational

  • performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 174 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Zhou, B., Tang, W. et al. Preoperative transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) in patients undergoing conversional hepatectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis. Eur Radiol 33, 1022–1030 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09063-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09063-0

Keywords

Navigation