To evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning with the convolutional neural networks (CNN) to distinguish each representative parkinsonian disorder using MRI.
This clinical retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for written informed consent was waived. Midsagittal T1-weighted MRI of a total of 419 subjects (125 Parkinson’s disease (PD), 98 progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and 54 multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonian features (MSA-P) patients, and 142 normal subjects) between January 2012 and April 2016 was retrospectively assessed. To deal with the overfitting problem of deep learning, all subjects were randomly divided into training (85%) and validation (15%) data sets with the same proportions of each disease and normal subjects. We trained the CNN to distinguish each parkinsonian disorder using single midsagittal T1-weighted MRI with a training group to minimize the differences between predicted output probabilities and the clinical diagnoses; then, we adopted the trained CNN to the validation data set. Subjects were classified into each parkinsonian disorder or normal condition according to the final diagnosis of the trained CNN, and we assessed the diagnostic performance of the CNN.
The accuracies of diagnostic performances regarding PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normal subjects were 96.8, 93.7, 95.2, and 98.4%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for distinguishing each condition from others (PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normal subjects) were 0.995, 0.982, 0.990, and 1.000, respectively.
Deep learning with CNN enables highly accurate discrimination of parkinsonian disorders using MRI.
• Deep learning convolution neural network achieves differential diagnosis of PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normal controls with an accuracy of 96.8, 93.7, 95.2, and 98.4%, respectively.
• The areas under the curves for distinguishing between PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normality were 0.995, 0.982, 0.990, and 1.000, respectively.
• CNN may learn important features that humans not notice, and has a possibility to perform previously impossible diagnoses.
This is a preview of subscription content,to check access.
Access this article
Convolutional neural network
Central nervous system
Joint photographic experts group
Multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonian features
Progressive supranuclear palsy
Rectified linear unit
Receiver operating characteristic
Seppi K, Yekhlef F, Diem A et al (2005) Progression of parkinsonism in multiple system atrophy. J Neurol 252:91–96
Dickson DW, Rademakers R, Hutton ML (2007) Progressive supranuclear palsy: pathology and genetics. Brain Pathol 17:74–82
Marras C, Lang A (2008) Invited article: changing concepts in Parkinson disease: moving beyond the decade of the brain. Neurology 70:1996–2003
Rizzo G, Copetti M, Arcuti S, Martino D, Fontana A, Logroscino G (2016) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 86:566–576
Hotter A, Esterhammer R, Schocke MF, Seppi K (2009) Potential of advanced MR imaging techniques in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. Mov Disord 24:S711–S720
Cosottini M, Ceravolo R, Faggioni L et al (2007) Assessment of midbrain atrophy in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy with routine magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Neurol Scand 116:37–42
Oba H, Yagishita A, Terada H et al (2005) New and reliable MRI diagnosis for progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 64:2050–2055
Heim B, Krismer F, De Marzi R, Seppi K (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 124:915–964
Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A, Kiryu S, Abe O (2018) Deep learning with convolutional neural network in radiology. Jpn J Radiol 36:257–272
Lee JG, Jun S, Cho YW et al (2017) Deep learning in medical imaging: general overview. Korean J Radiol 18:570–584
van der Burgh HK, Schmidt R, Westeneng HJ, de Reus MA, van den Berg LH, van den Heuvel MP (2016) Deep learning predictions of survival based on MRI in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin 13:361–369
Laukamp KR, Thiele F, Shakirin G et al (2019) Fully automated detection and segmentation of meningiomas using deep learning on routine multiparametric MRI. Eur Radiol 29:124–132
Lin W, Tong T, Gao Q et al (2018) Convolutional neural networks-based MRI image analysis for the Alzheimer’s disease prediction from mild cognitive impairment. Front Neurosci 12:777
Xin J, Zhang Y, Tang Y, Yang Y (2019) Brain differences between men and women: evidence from deep learning. Front Neurosci 13:185
Korfiatis P, Erickson B (2019) Deep learning can see the unseeable: predicting molecular markers from MRI of brain gliomas. Clin Radiol 74:367–373
Gong E, Pauly JM, Wintermark M, Zaharchuk G (2018) Deep learning enables reduced gadolinium dose for contrast-enhanced brain MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 48:330–340
Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D et al (1996) Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDS-SPSP International Workshop. Neurology 47:1–9
Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ (1992) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:181–184
Gilman S, Wenning GK, Low PA et al (2008) Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology 71:670–676
Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15:1929–1958
Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458
Rizzo G, Zanigni S, De Blasi R et al (2016) Brain MR contribution to the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes: an update. Parkinsons Dis 2016:2983638
Möller L, Kassubek J, Südmeyer M et al (2017) Manual MRI morphometry in parkinsonian syndromes. Mov Disord 32:778–782
Goldman JG, Bledsoe IO, Merkitch D, Dinh V, Bernard B, Stebbins GT (2017) Corpus callosal atrophy and associations with cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease. Neurology 88:1265–1272
Boelmans K, Bodammer NC, Suchorska B et al (2010) Diffusion tensor imaging of the corpus callosum differentiates corticobasal syndrome from Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 16:498–502
Rosskopf J, Müller HP, Huppertz HJ, Ludolph AC, Pinkhardt EH, Kassubek J (2014) Frontal corpus callosum alterations in progressive supranuclear palsy but not in Parkinson’s disease. Neurodegener Dis 14:184–193
Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D (2017) Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Available via https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02391. Accessed 2 Feb 2019
Samek W, Binder A, Montavon G, Lapuschkin S, Muller KR (2017) Evaluating the visualization of what a deep neural network has learned. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28:2660–2673
Philbrick KA, Yoshida K, Inoue D et al (2018) What does deep learning see? Insights from a classifier trained to predict contrast enhancement phase from CT images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:1184–1193
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Shigeru Kiryu.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
• diagnostic or prognostic study
• performed at one institution
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kiryu, S., Yasaka, K., Akai, H. et al. Deep learning to differentiate parkinsonian disorders separately using single midsagittal MR imaging: a proof of concept study. Eur Radiol 29, 6891–6899 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06327-0