Advertisement

European Radiology

, Volume 29, Issue 7, pp 3626–3634 | Cite as

Two sequential applications of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation for large benign thyroid nodules

  • Brian H. H. LangEmail author
  • Yu-Cho Woo
  • Keith Wan-Hang Chiu
Ultrasound
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation is a promising treatment for benign thyroid nodules but single application is less effective in larger-sized nodules. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of two sequential applications in larger-sized nodules.

Methods

Fifty patients underwent ablation of a large-sized nodule (baseline volume ≥ 20 mL and diameter ≤ 50 mm). Thirty-one (62.0%) patients underwent single application (group I) while 19 (38.0%) underwent two sequential applications (group II). Nodule shrinkage (by volume reduction ratio or VRR), pain scores during and after ablation, and rate of vocal cord palsy (VCP), skin burn, and nausea/vomiting were compared between the two groups. t test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables while chi-square test was used for categorical variables. To determine factors for VRR, multivariate analysis was done by logistic regression analysis.

Results

Total energy delivered and treatment time were significantly more in group II (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Total energy per nodule volume (kJ/mL) was also significantly greater in group II (1.01 kJ/mL vs. 0.57 kJ/mL, p < 0.001). The 6-month VRR was significantly greater in group II (56.74 ± 11.47% vs. 43.49 ± 12.03%, p = 0.004). Pain severity and rates of VCP, skin burn, and nausea/vomiting were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). Sequential application was an independent determinant of 6-month VRR (OR = 13.936, 95% CI = 1.738–197.399, p = 0.036).

Conclusions

Sequential application led to better 6-month treatment efficacy than single application in large-sized nodules. Patients undergoing sequential application are not at greater risks of treatment-related side effects afterwards.

Key Points

• Sequential application produces better 6-month efficacy over single application for large-sized nodules.

• Sequential HIFU application is well-tolerated and safe in patients with large-sized nodules.

• Sequential application takes longer and requires larger amount of pethidine and diazepam.

Keywords

Interventional ultrasonography High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation Nodular goiter Ultrasound imaging Ablation techniques 

Abbreviations

HIFU

High-intensity focused ultrasound

Tg

Thyroglobulin

TSH

Thyroid-stimulating hormone

US

Ultrasonography

VAS

Visual analogue scale

VCP

Vocal cord palsy

VRR

Volume reduction ratio

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mr. Hill Yu for conducting all the pain assessments during and after HIFU treatment and Ms. Helen Zhi for the statistical support.

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Professor Stephen Cheng (Head of Department).

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• Retrospective

• Observational

• Single institution

References

  1. 1.
    Gharib H, Papini E, Garber JR et al (2016) AACE/ACE/AME Task Force on Thyroid Nodules. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules - 2016 update. Endocr Pract 22(5):622–639Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC et al (2016) 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 26:1–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Durante C, Costante G, Lucisano G et al (2015) The natural history of benign thyroid nodules. JAMA 313(9):926–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Korkusuz Y, Gröner D, Raczynski N et al (2017) Thermal ablation of thyroid nodules: are radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation and high intensity focused ultrasound equally safe and effective methods? Eur Radiol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5039-x
  5. 5.
    Dietrich CF, Müller T, Bojunga J et al (2018) Statement and recommendations on interventional ultrasound as a thyroid diagnostic and treatment procedure. Ultrasound Med Biol 44(1):14–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pacella CM, Mauri G, Cesareo R et al (2017) A comparison of laser with radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules: a propensity score matching analysis. Int J Hyperthermia 33(8):911–919Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Korkusuz H, Fehre N, Sennert M, Happel C, Grünwald F (2015) Volume reduction of benign thyroid nodules 3 months after a single treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). J Ther Ultrasound 4(3):4.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40349-015-0024-9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kovatcheva RD, Vlahov JD, Stoinov JI, Zaletel K (2015) Benign solid thyroid nodules: US-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation-initial clinical outcomes. Radiology 276(2):597–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trimboli P, Bini F, Marinozzi F, Baek JH, Giovanella L (2018) High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for benign thyroid nodules without anesthesia or sedation. Endocrine 61(2):210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lang BH, Woo YC, Wong CKH (2017) High-intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of symptomatic benign thyroid nodules: a prospective study. Radiology 284(3):897–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lang BH, Woo YC, Chiu KW (2017) Single-session high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in large-sized benign thyroid nodules. Thyroid 27(5):714–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sennert M, Happel C, Korkusuz Y, Grünwald F, Polenz B, Gröner D (2017) Further investigation on high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for thyroid nodules: effectiveness related to baseline volumes. Acad Radiol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.07.011
  13. 13.
    Lang BHH, Woo YC, Chiu KW (2018) Sequential high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in the treatment of benign multinodular goitre: an observational retrospective study. Eur Radiol 28(8):3237–3244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cibas ES, Ali SZ; NCI Thyroid FNA State of the Science Conference (2009) The Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol 132(5):658–665Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zimmermann M, Saad A, Hess S, Torresani T, Chaouki N (2000) Thyroid ultrasound compared with World Health Organization 1960 and 1994 palpation criteria for determination of goiter prevalence in regions of mild and severe iodine deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol 143(6):727–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wong KP, Lang BH, Ng SH, Cheung CY, Chan CT, Lo CY (2013) A prospective, assessor-blind evaluation of surgeon-performed transcutaneous laryngeal ultrasonography in vocal cord examination before and after thyroidectomy. Surgery 154(6):1158–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hospital Authority. 2013. Revisions to List of charges: G.N. 1488 to Gazette No. 12/2013. In Hong Kong Government Printers. Available: http://www.gld.gov.hk/egazette/english/gazette/toc.php [Accessed on 1st Aug 2018]
  18. 18.
    Mauri G, Cova L, Monaco CG et al (2016) Benign thyroid nodules treatment using percutaneous laser ablation (PLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Int J Hyperthermia 15:1–5Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mainini AP, Monaco C, Pescatori LC et al (2016) Image-guided thermal ablation of benign thyroid nodules. J Ultrasound 20(1):11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hoogenboom M, Eikelenboom D, den Brok MH, Heerschap A, Fütterer JJ, Adema GJ (2015) Mechanical high-intensity focused ultrasound destruction of soft tissue: working mechanisms and physiologic effects. Ultrasound Med Biol 41(6):1500–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lim HK, Lee JH, Ha EJ, Sung JY, Kim JK, Baek JH (2013) Radiofrequency ablation of benign non-functioning thyroid nodules: 4-year follow-up results for 111 patients. Eur Radiol 23(4):1044–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cesareo R, Pasqualini V, Simeoni C et al (2015) Prospective study of effectiveness of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation versus control group in patients affected by benign thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100(2):460–466Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lang BHH, Woo YC, Chiu KW (2018) Significance of hyperechoic marks observed during high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of benign thyroid nodules. Eur Radiol 28(6):2675–2681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cantisani V, Consorti F, Guerrisi A et al (2013) Prospective comparative evaluation of quantitative-elastosonography (Q-elastography) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of thyroid nodules: preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol 82(11):1892–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Andrioli M, Valcavi R (2015) Ultrasound B-flow imaging in the evaluation of thermal ablation of thyroid nodules. Endocrine 48(3):1013–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryThe University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryQueen Mary HospitalHong Kong SARChina
  3. 3.Department of MedicineThe University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyThe University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations