Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate technical feasibility and safety of endovascular tumor specimen sampling using an escalating endovascular biopsy strategy using a directional atherectomy device compared with forceps biopsy and catheter aspiration.
Materials and methods
Between 2013 and 2017, a cohort of ten consecutive patients (6 male; median age 56, range 39–73 years) was referred for sampling of endovascular masses. Localizations included the abdominal aorta (n = 4), left brachiocephalic vein (n = 2), inferior vena cava (n = 1), and left pulmonary artery (n = 3). For each individual mass, all three endovascular tissue sampling approaches were applied including catheter-based aspiration, straight two-jaw biopsy forceps, and directional atherectomy during a single session.
Results
Aspiration and forceps biopsy did not provide sufficient material for histological analyses. In contrast, technical success for endovascular tumor sampling using directional atherectomy was 100%. After two atherectomy passages, sufficient material was available for each vessel region allowing histologic diagnosis, which revealed sarcoma and chronic inflammation for masses in the aorta, angiosarcoma for brachiocephalic vein, hepatocellular carcinoma for inferior vena cava, and angiosarcoma for pulmonary artery. In case of a histologically benign diagnosis, no malignant tumor proliferation was obvious on follow-up imaging studies after 3 months and 1 year. Thus, the rate of false-negative results was considered 0%. No procedure-associated complications, e.g., vessel perforation, were recorded.
Conclusion
Preliminary results in a limited number of patients proved directional atherectomy beneficial as a safe and feasible technique for endoluminal tissue sampling of vascular masses. Additional large-scale studies are necessary and worthy for further evaluation in clinical practice.
Key Points
• Endovascular masses pose a challenge to appropriate clinical management.
• Off-label directional atherectomy proved to be a safe and feasible technique for endoluminal tissue sampling of vascular masses. Furthermore, directional atherectomy was superior to aspiration or forceps biopsy in our small study cohort.
• Directional atherectomy may represent the last or only option for tissue probing as a prerequisite for further treatment decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AO:
-
Thoracoabdominal aorta
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- IVC:
-
Inferior vena cava
- LBCV:
-
Left brachiocephalic vein
- mm:
-
Millimeter
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PA:
-
Pulmonary artery
- PET-CT:
-
Positron-emitting tomography
References
Maingard J, Brooks M (2017) Transcaval core biopsy in malignant superior vena cava obstruction: potential for single stage diagnosis and treatment. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12592
Robins JM, Bookstein JJ (1972) Percutaneous transcaval biopsy technique in the evaluation of inferior vena cava occlusion. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/105.2.451
Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, Trost DW, Litvak B, Gold JP, Sos TA (1996) Endovascular catheter biopsy of a pulmonary artery sarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.3.8751674
Massmann A, Katoh M, Shayesteh-Kheslat R, Buecker A (2012) Mechanical recanalization of subacute vessel occlusion in peripheral arterial disease with a directional atherectomy catheter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0364-6
Guirola JA, Laborda A, De Gregorio MA (2017) Percutaneous intravascular biopsy using a bronchoscopy forceps diagnosis of a pulmonary artery intimal sarcoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-016-1475-2
June AS, Harris DG, Yoo C et al (2017) Percutaneous treatment of multiple recurrent Thromboembolization from a descending thoracic aortic intimal sarcoma. Ann Vasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2016.06.036
Hu W, Xie Y, Zhang D (2013) Pulmonary artery intimal sarcoma diagnosed by percutaneous transcatheter aspiration. Chin Med J (Engl) 126:1590–1591
Dake MD, Zemel G, Dolmatch BL, Katzen BT (1990) The cause of superior vena cava syndrome: diagnosis with percutaneous atherectomy. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.174.3.174-3-957
Castaneda F, Moradian G, Hunter D, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Amplatz K (1989) Percutaneous intravascular biopsy using a Simpson atherectomy catheter: technical note. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 12:342–343
Kaufman D, Widlus D, Lazinger M, Didolkar M, Kumar D, Dutta SK (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of Simpson atherectomy catheter biopsy in detecting pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Am J Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03688.x
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Univ. Prof. Dr. med. Arno Buecker.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Methodology
• prospective
• case-control study
• performed at one institution
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Massmann, A., Seidel, R., Schneider, G.K. et al. Percutaneous endovascular tissue sampling of endoluminal tumors using directional atherectomy. Eur Radiol 29, 5007–5012 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06015-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06015-z