European Radiology

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 2949–2957 | Cite as

Computed tomography improves the differentiation of infectious mediastinitis from normal postoperative changes after sternotomy in cardiac surgery

  • Borek FoldynaEmail author
  • Martin Mueller
  • Christian D. Etz
  • Christian Luecke
  • Josephina Haunschild
  • Ines Hoffmann
  • Matthias Gutberlet
  • Lukas Lehmkuhl



To identify CT parameters independently associated with infectious mediastinitis after cardiac surgery and to improve the discrimination of patients with acute infection from those with normal postoperative changes.


In this single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study, we evaluated thoracic CT scans of poststernotomy cardiac surgery patients. Inclusion criteria were clinically suspected mediastinitis, unclear CT signs (e.g., retrosternal mass), and subsequent deep revision surgery. Revision surgery and microbiological samples determined the mediastinitis status. Overall, 22 qualitative and quantitative CT imaging parameters were assessed and associated with infectious mediastinitis in univariate and multivariate regression models. Discriminative capacity and incremental value of the CT features to available clinical parameters were determined by AUC and likelihood-ratio tests, respectively.


Overall 105 patients (82% men; 67.0 ± 10.3 years) underwent CT and deep revision surgery. Mediastinitis was confirmed in 83/105 (79%) patients. Among available clinical parameters, only C-reactive protein (CRP) was independently associated with infectious mediastinitis (multivariate odds ratio (OR) (per standard deviation) = 2.3; p < 0.001). In the CT, the presence of free gas, pleural effusions, and brachiocephalic lymph node size were independently associated with mediastinitis (multivariate ORs = 1.3–6.3; p < 0.001–0.039). Addition of these CT parameters to CRP increased the model fit significantly (X2 = 17.9; p < 0.001; AUC, 0.83 vs. 0.73).


The presence of free gas, pleural effusions, and brachiocephalic lymph node size in CT is independently associated with infectious mediastinitis in poststernotomy patients with retrosternal mass. These imaging features may help to differentiate mediastinitis from normal postoperative changes beyond traditional clinical parameters such as CRP.

Key Points

Presence of free gas, pleural effusions, and brachiocephalic lymph node size on CT are associated independently with infectious mediastinitis.

• Combination of these CT parameters increases the discriminatory capacity of clinical parameters such as CRP.


Multidetector computed tomography Mediastinitis Sternotomy Cardiac surgery 



C-reactive protein


Hounsfield unit


Intra-class correlation coefficient


Inter-quartile range


Lymph node


Odds ratio


Region of interest


Standard deviation


Volume of interest



BF received unrelated funding from the German Research Foundation (DFG) project 290004377 (FO 993/1).


The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Compliance with ethical standards


The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Dr. Matthias Gutberlet.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.


• retrospective

• observational

• performed at one institution

Supplementary material

330_2018_5946_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.8 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 3918 kb)


  1. 1.
    Barsoum EA, Azab B, Shah N et al (2015) Long-term mortality in minimally invasive compared with sternotomy coronary artery bypass surgery in the geriatric population (75 years and older patients). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 47:862–867. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV (2009) Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:670–679.e5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buja A, Zampieron A, Cavalet S et al (2012) An update review on risk factors and scales for prediction of deep sternal wound infections. Int Wound J 9:372–386. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gorlitzer M, Wagner F, Pfeiffer S et al (2013) Prevention of sternal wound complications after sternotomy: results of a large prospective randomized multicentre trial. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 17:515–522. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown PP, Kugelmass AD, Cohen DJ et al (2008) The frequency and cost of complications associated with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: results from the United States Medicare Program. Ann Thorac Surg 85:1980–1986. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Speir AM, Kasirajan V, Barnett SD, Fonner E (2009) Additive costs of postoperative complications for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Virginia. Ann Thorac Surg 88:40–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan M, Yusuf E, Giulieri S et al (2016) A retrospective study of deep sternal wound infections: clinical and microbiological characteristics, treatment, and risk factors for complications. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 84:261–265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Athanassiadi KA (2009) Infections of the mediastinum. Thorac Surg Clin 19:37–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Wingerden JJ, Maas M, Braam RL, de Mol BA (2016) Diagnosing poststernotomy mediastinitis in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 34:618–622. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bitkover CY, Cederlund K, Aberg B, Vaage J (1999) Computed tomography of the sternum and mediastinum after median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 68:858–863. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Exarhos DN, Malagari K, Tsatalou EG et al (2005) Acute mediastinitis: spectrum of computed tomography findings. Eur Radiol 15:1569–1574. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jolles H, Henry DA, Roberson JP, Cole TJ, Spratt JA (1996) Mediastinitis following median sternotomy: CT findings. Radiology 201:463–466.
  13. 13.
    Misawa Y, Fuse K, Hasegawa T (1998) Infectious mediastinitis after cardiac operations: computed tomographic findings. Ann Thorac Surg 65:622–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yamaguchi H, Yamauchi H, Yamada T, Ariyoshi T, Aikawa H, Kato Y(2001) Diagnostic validity of computed tomography for mediastinitis after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 7:94–98Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yamashiro T, Kamiya H, Murayama S et al (2008) Infectious mediastinitis after cardiovascular surgery: role of computed tomography. Radiat Med 26:343–347. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Breatnach E, Nath PH, Delany DJ (1986) The role of computed tomography in acute and subacute mediastinitis. Clin Radiol 37:139–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carrol CL, Jeffrey RB Jr, Federle MP, Vernacchia FS (1987) CT evaluation of mediastinal infections. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11:449–454Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Elia S, End A, Canalis E, Lode H, Granai Vittoria A, Petrella G (2013) Mediastinitis: causes, management and outcomes. In: Rohde G, Subotic D (eds) Complex pleuropulmonary infections. European Respiratory Society, Norwich, UK, pp 122–140Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kay HR, Goodman LR, Teplick SK, Mundth ED (1983) Use of computed tomography to assess mediastinal complications after median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 36:706–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Herrmann M, Kniehl E, Mauch H, Podbielski A (2007) MiQ: Qualitätsstandards in der mikrobiologisch-infektiologischen Diagnostik, MiQ Grundwerk Heft 1–29. Urban & Fischer, MunichGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA (2008) CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care–associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 36:309–332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abramowitz Y, Simanovsky N, Goldstein MS, Hiller N (2009) Pleural effusion: characterization with CT attenuation values and CT appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:618–623. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim SH, Chung JH, Kwon BJ, Song SW, Choi WS (2014) The associations of epicardial adipose tissue with coronary artery disease and coronary atherosclerosis. Int Heart J 55:197–203Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McWilliams SR, O’Connor OJ, McGarrigle AM et al (2012) CT-based estimation of intracavitary gas volumes using threshold-based segmentation: in vitro study to determine the optimal threshold range: gas volume estimation with CT. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 56:289–294. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Riquet M, Le Pimpec-Barthes F, Hidden G (2001) Lymphatic drainage of the pericardium to the mediastinal lymph nodes. Surg Radiol Anat 23:317–319.
  26. 26.
    Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH (1990) Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174:331–336. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Klein AL, Abbara S, Agler DA et al (2013) American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:965–1012.e15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vaidyanathan S, Patel CN, Scarsbrook AF, Chowdhury FU (2015) FDG PET/CT in infection and inflammation—current and emerging clinical applications. Clin Radiol 70:787–800. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity of Leipzig – Heart CenterLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Cardiac MR PET CT ProgramMassachusetts General Hospital – Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Cardiac SurgeryUniversity of Leipzig – Heart CenterLeipzigGermany
  4. 4.MVZ Laboratory Reising-Ackermann MD and ColleaguesLeipzigGermany
  5. 5.Clinic for RadiologyCardiovascular Center Bad NeustadtBad NeustadtGermany

Personalised recommendations