European Radiology

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 2253–2262 | Cite as

Comparison of lung imaging using three-dimensional ultrashort echo time and zero echo time sequences: preliminary study

  • Kyungsoo Bae
  • Kyung Nyeo JeonEmail author
  • Moon Jung Hwang
  • Joon Sung Lee
  • Ji Young Ha
  • Kyeong Hwa Ryu
  • Ho Cheol Kim
Magnetic Resonance



To determine the feasibility of using high-resolution volumetric zero echo time (ZTE) sequence in routine lung magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare free breathing 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE) and ZTE lung MRI in terms of image quality and small-nodule detection.

Materials and methods

Our Institutional Review Board approved this study. Twenty patients underwent both UTE and ZTE sequences during routine lung MR. UTE and ZTE images were compared in terms of subjective image quality and detection of lung parenchymal signal, intrapulmonary structures, and sub-centimeter nodules. Differences between the two sequences were compared through statistical analysis.


Lung parenchyma showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in ZTE than in UTE. The SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of peripheral bronchus and small pulmonary arteries were significantly (all p < 0.05) higher in ZTE. Subjective image quality evaluated by two independent radiologists in terms of depicting normal structures and overall acceptability was superior in ZTE (p < 0.05). The diagnostic accuracy for sub-centimeter nodules was significantly higher for ZTE (reader 1: AUC, 0.972; p = 0.044; reader 2: AUC, 0.946; p = 0.045) than that for UTE (reader 1: AUC, 0.885; reader 2: AUC, 0.855). Mean scan time was 131 s (125–141 s) in ZTE and 467 s (453–508 s) in UTE. ZTE images were obtained with less acoustic noise.


Implementing ZTE as an additional sequence in routine lung MR is feasible. ZTE can provide high-resolution pulmonary structural information with better SNR and CNR using shorter time than UTE.

Key Points

• Both UTE and ZTE techniques use very short TEs to capture signals from very short T2/T2* tissues.

• ZTE is superior in capturing lung parenchymal signal than UTE.

• ZTE provides high-resolution structural information with better SNR and CNR for normal intrapulmonary structures and small nodules using shorter scan time than UTE.


Lung Magnetic resonance imaging Ultrashort T2 Ultrashort echo time Zero-echo-time imaging 



Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve


Contrast-to-noise ratio


Radio frequency


Region of interest


Signal intensity


Signal-to-noise ratio


Echo time


Ultra-short echo time


Zero echo time



The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Compliance with ethical standards


The scientific guarantor of this publication is Kyung Nyeo Jeon.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare a relationship with GE Healthcare. GE Healthcare had provided them with 3D cones ultra-short TE research pulse. MJ Hwang and JS Lee are employees of GE Healthcare (GE Healthcare Research, Korea). GE Healthcare had no role in the design and performance of the study, data analyses, or data interpretation.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.


• Prospective

• Diagnostic or prognostic study

• Performed at one institution

Supplementary material

330_2018_5889_MOESM1_ESM.docx (555 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 554 kb)


  1. 1.
    Bergin CJ, Glover GM, Pauly J (1993) Magnetic resonance imaging of lung parenchyma. J Thorac Imaging 8:12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gatehouse PD, Bydder GM (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of short T2 components in tissue. Clin Radiol 58:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robson MD, Gatehouse PD, Bydder M, Bydder GM (2003) Magnetic resonance: an introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:825–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reichert IL, Benjamin M, Gatehouse PD et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of periosteum with ultrashort TE pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robson MD, Benjamin M, Gishen P, Bydder GM (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of the Achilles tendon using ultrashort TE (UTE) pulse sequences. Clin Radiol 59:727–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alsop DC, Hatabu H, Bonnet M, Listerud J, Gefter W (1995) Multi-slice, breathhold imaging of the lung with submillisecond echo times. Magn Reson Med 33:678–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Takahashi M, Togao O, Obara M et al (2010) Ultra-short echo time (UTE) MR imaging of the lung: comparison between normal and emphysematous lungs in mutant mice. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:326–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ma W, Sheikh K, Svenningsen S et al (2015) Ultra-short echo-time pulmonary MRI: evaluation and reproducibility in COPD subjects with and without bronchiectasis. J Magn Reson Imaging 41:1465–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ohno Y, Nishio M, Koyama H et al (2014) Pulmonary 3 T MRI with ultrashort TEs: influence of ultrashort echo time interval on pulmonary functional and clinical stage assessments of smokers. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:988–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson KM, Fain SB, Schiebler ML, Nagle S (2013) Optimized 3D ultrashort echo time pulmonary MRI. Magn Reson Med 70:1241–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weiger M, Brunner DO, Dietrich BE, Müller CF, Pruessmann KP (2013) ZTE imaging in humans. Magn Reson Med 70:328–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alibek S, Vogel M, Sun W et al (2014) Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 20:360–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weiger M, Wu M, Wurnig MC et al (2015) ZTE imaging with long-T2 suppression. NMR Biomed 28:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holdsworth SJ, Macpherson SJ, Yeom KW, Wintermark M, Zaharchuk G (2018) Clinical evaluation of silent T1-weighted MRI and silent MR angiography of the brain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:404–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibiino F, Sacolick L, Menini A, Landini L, Wiesinger F (2015) Free-breathing, zero-TE MR lung imaging. MAGMA 28:207–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ko JP, Azour L (2018) Management of incidental lung nodules. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 39:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 284:228–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weiger M, Wu M, Wurnig MC et al (2014) Rapid and robust pulmonary proton ZTE imaging in the mouse. NMR Biomed 27:1129–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gurney PT, Hargreaves BA, Nishimura DG (2006) Design and analysis of a practical 3D cones trajectory. Magn Reson Med 55:575–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bianchi A, Tibiletti M, Kjørstad Å et al (2015) Three-dimensional accurate detection of lung emphysema in rats using ultra-short and zero echo time MRI. NMR Biomed 28:1471–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Niwa T, Nozawa K, Aida N (2017) Visualization of the airway in infants with MRI using pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA). J Magn Reson Imaging 45:839–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yu J, Xue Y, Song HK (2011) Comparison of lung T2* during free-breathing at 1.5 T and 3.0 T with ultrashort echo time imaging. Magn Reson Med 66:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hatabu H, Alsop DC, Listerud J, Bonnet M, Gefter WB (1999) T2* and proton density measurement of normal human lung parenchyma using submillisecond echo time gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 29:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koyama H, Ohno Y, Kono A et al (2008) Quantitative and qualitative assessment of non-contrast-enhanced pulmonary MR imaging for management of pulmonary nodules in 161 subjects. Eur Radiol 18:2120–2131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meier-Schroers M, Homsi R, Skowasch D et al (2018) Lung cancer screening with MRI: results of the first screening round. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ohno Y, Koyama H, Yoshikawa T et al (2016) Pulmonary high-resolution ultrashort TE MR imaging: comparison with thin-section standard- and low-dose computed tomography for the assessment of pulmonary parenchyma diseases. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:512–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burris NS, Johnson KM, Larson PE et al (2016) Detection of small pulmonary nodules with ultrashort echo time sequences in oncology patients by using a PET/MR system. Radiology 278:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wiesinger F, Sacolick LI, Menini A et al (2016) Zero TE MR bone imaging in the head. Magn Reson Med 75:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Price DL, De Wilde JP, Papadaki AM, Curran JS, Kitney RI (2001) Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:288–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Matsuo-Hagiyama C, Watanabe Y, Tanaka H et al (2017) Comparison of silent and conventional MR imaging for the evaluation of myelination in children. Magn Reson Med Sci 16:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Institute of Health SciencesGyeongsang National University School of MedicineJinjuSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyGyeongsang National University Changwon HospitalChangwonSouth Korea
  3. 3.General Electronics (GE) Healthcare KoreaSeoulSouth Korea
  4. 4.Department of Internal MedicineGyeongsang National University School of MedicineJinjuSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations