Double-inversion recovery with synthetic magnetic resonance: a pilot study for assessing synovitis of the knee joint compared to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
- 171 Downloads
To investigate the agreement between double-inversion recovery (DIR) with synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI for the assessment of knee synovitis.
T1-weighted CE-MRI and synthetic MRI of 30 patients were compared. Synthetic DIR image reconstruction was performed with two inversion times (280–330 ms and 2800–2900 ms). Subjective image quality, visibility of synovium, detection of synovitis, and total synovitis score in the knee joint were evaluated on both MR images. The relative signal intensity (SI) and relative contrast of synovium, joint effusion, and bone marrow for two imaging were assessed. Differences in data between two imaging were assessed by using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test and chi-square test/Fisher’s exact test. Interobserver agreement was expressed as weighted kappa value. Accuracy of synthetic DIR image was calculated by using CE-MRI as reference standard.
T1-weighted CE-MRI yielded better image quality than synthetic DIR imaging (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreements for detecting synovitis diagnosis/sum of the synovitis score were moderate to almost perfect (κ = 0.58/0.44, synthetic DIR; κ = 0.83/0.65, T1-weighted CE-MRI). There were no statistical differences in visibility of synovium (p = 0.058–0.190), detection of synovitis (p < 0.001), and relative SI of structures between two imaging (p = 0.086–0.360). Synovium-to-effusion contrast was higher in synthetic DIR (p = 0.003) and synovium-to-bone marrow contrast was higher in CE-MRI (p < 0.001).
Synthetic DIR imaging showed a moderate degree of interobserver agreement and good accuracy for detecting synovitis. Though it has limitations, it may play a role in imaging of degenerative joint disease or larger cohort scientific studies where gadolinium application is not feasible.
• Synthetic double-inversion recovery (DIR) imaging avoids the use of contrast agent.
• There was no significant difference between T1-weighted CE-MRI and synthetic DIR imaging in evaluating presence of synovitis in knee joint.
• Synthetic DIR imaging showed moderate degree of interobserver agreement and good accuracy for detecting synovitis compared to CE-MRI, and it may facilitate evaluation of some regions of peripatellar synovitis.
KeywordsKnee Synovitis Magnetic resonance imaging Contrast media
Multiple-dynamic multiple echo
This work was supported by a National Research Foundation (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government, Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIP, 2018R1A2B6008076).
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Young Han Lee.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
• Diagnostic or prognostic study
• Performed at one institution
- 9.Roemer FW, Kassim Javaid M, Guermazi A et al (2010) Anatomical distribution of synovitis in knee osteoarthritis and its association with joint effusion assessed on non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18:1269–1274Google Scholar
- 14.Kang H, Hii M, Le M et al (2018) Gadolinium deposition in deep brain structures: relationship with dose and ionization of linear gadolinium-based contrast agents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5751
- 15.Loeuille D, Sauliere N, Champigneulle J, Rat AC, Blum A, Chary-Valckenaere I (2011) Comparing non-enhanced and enhanced sequences in the assessment of effusion and synovitis in knee OA: associations with clinical, macroscopic and microscopic features. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 19:1433–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Saranathan M, Worters PW, Rettmann DW, Winegar B, Becker J (2017) Physics for clinicians: fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and double inversion recovery (DIR) imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25737
- 20.Eichinger P, Kirschke JS, Hoshi MM, Zimmer C, Mühlau M, Riederer I (2017) Pre- and postcontrast 3D double inversion recovery sequence in multiple sclerosis: a simple and effective MR imaging protocol. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5329
- 21.Son YN, Jin W, Jahng GH et al (2017) Efficacy of double inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of the synovium in the femoro-patellar joint without contrast enhancement. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5017-3
- 26.Tanenbaum LN, Tsiouris AJ, Johnson AN et al (2017) Synthetic MRI for clinical neuroimaging: results of the Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation (MAGiC) Prospective, Multicenter, Multireader Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:1103–1110Google Scholar