Abstract
Objective
To describe the appearance of the anatomical variations of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) on MR images and to highlight the potential MR features that might be misleading.
Methods
Consecutive MRI examinations of SIJs performed at our department from January 2015 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. As one of our goals was to describe potential misleading edematous or structural changes associated with SIJ anatomical variations, patients fulfilling the ASAS criteria were excluded from this study to ensure that signal intensity changes would not be related to sacroiliitis. Five anatomical variations and a dysmorphic appearance of the SIJ were detected.
Results
The final group consisted of 157 patients. Unilateral or bilateral anatomical variations of the SIJ were found in 50 patients (accessory SIJ, iliosacral complex and sacral defect in 17, 18 and 21 patients, respectively, and synostosis in one patient). A dysmorphic appearance of the SIJ was found in 26 patients. No case of an unfused ossification centers was depicted. Structural and/or edematous changes of the facing bones were quite frequently observed in accessory and dysmorphic SIJ. Iliosacral complex and sacral defects could be associated with prominent vessels running along their bony surfaces.
Conclusion
Several anatomical variations of the SIJs are relatively commonly seen on MR images, particularly in females. These variations may be associated with signal intensity changes, which may be mechanical and not necessarily inflammatory in nature.
Key points
• Anatomical variations of SIJ may involve the cartilaginous or ligamentous part of the joint
• Anatomical variations of SIJ are sometimes associated with edematous and/or structural changes of the adjacent bone
• Anatomical variations of the SIJ can be misleading on MR imaging
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
Confidence intervals
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- SIJ:
-
Sacroiliac joints
- SpA:
-
Spondyloarthritis
- SPAIR:
-
Spectral attenuated inversion recovery
References
Laloo F, Herregods N, Varkas G et al (2017) MR signal in the sacroiliac joint space in spondyloarthritis: a new sign. Eur Radiol 27:2024–2030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4587-9
Rudwaleit M, Jurik AG, K-GA H et al (2009) Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1520–1527. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.110767
Lambert RGW, Bakker PAC, van der Heijde D et al (2016) Defining active sacroiliitis on MRI for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: update by the ASAS MRI working group. Ann Rheum Dis 75:1958–1963. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208642
Plagou A, Teh J, Grainger AJ et al (2016) Recommendations of the ESSR Arthritis Subcommittee on Ultrasonography in Inflammatory Joint Disease. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 20:496–506. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1593533
Sudoł-Szopińska I, Jurik AG, Eshed I et al (2015) Recommendations of the ESSR Arthritis Subcommittee for the Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Musculoskeletal Rheumatic Diseases. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19:396–411. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1564696
Marzo-Ortega H, McGonagle D, O’Connor P et al (2009) Baseline and 1-year magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joint and lumbar spine in very early inflammatory back pain. Relationship between symptoms, HLA-B27 and disease extent and persistence. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1721–1727. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.097931
Braun J, van den Berg R, Baraliakos X et al (2011) 2010 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 70:896–904. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2011.151027
Weber U, Jurik AG, Lambert RGW, Maksymowych WP (2016) Imaging in spondyloarthritis: controversies in recognition of early disease. Curr Rheumatol Rep 18:58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-016-0607-7
Postacchini R, Trasimeni G, Ripani F et al (2017) Morphometric anatomical and CT study of the human adult sacroiliac region. Surg Radiol Anat 39:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1703-0
Demir M, Mavi A, Gümüsburun E et al (2007) Anatomical variations with joint space measurements on CT. Kobe J Med Sci 53:209–217
Ehara S, el-Khoury GY, Bergman RA (1988) The accessory sacroiliac joint: a common anatomic variant. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:857–859. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.150.4.857
Prassopoulos PK, Faflia CP, Voloudaki AE, Gourtsoyiannis NC (1999) Sacroiliac joints: anatomical variants on CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:323–327
Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT et al (2012) The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat 221:537–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01564.x
Egund N, Jurik AG (2014) Anatomy and histology of the sacroiliac joints. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 18:332–339. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1375574
Rana SH, Farjoodi P, Haloman S et al (2015) Anatomic evaluation of the sacroiliac joint: a radiographic study with implications for procedures. Pain Physician 18:583–592
Rosa Neto NS, Vitule LF, Gonçalves CR, Goldenstein-Schainberg C (2009) An accessory sacroiliac joint. Scand J Rheumatol 38:496. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009740903036008
Klang E, Lidar M, Lidar Z et al (2017) Prevalence and awareness of sacroiliac joint alterations on lumbar spine CT in low back pain patients younger than 40 years. Acta Radiol 1987(58):449–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185116656490
Hadley LA (1950) Accessory sacroiliac articulations with arthritic changes. Radiology 55:403–409. https://doi.org/10.1148/55.3.403
Fortin JD, Ballard KE (2009) The frequency of accessory sacroiliac joints. Clin Anat 22:876–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20772
Benz RM, Daikeler T, Mameghani AT et al (2014) Synostosis of the sacroiliac joint as a developmental variant, or ankylosis due to sacroiliitis? Arthritis Rheumatol 66:2367. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.38691
Maksymowych WP, Wichuk S, Dougados M et al (2017) MRI evidence of structural changes in the sacroiliac joints of patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis even in the absence of MRI inflammation. Arthritis Res Ther 19:126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1342-9
Bakker PAC, van den Berg R, Lenczner G et al (2017) Can we use structural lesions seen on MRI of the sacroiliac joints reliably for the classification of patients according to the ASAS axial spondyloarthritis criteria? Data from the DESIR cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 76:392–398. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209405
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Anne Cotten.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was not required for this study because it was a retrospective study
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained: This study was conducted in accordance with our local review board recommendations and with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Methodology
• retrospective
• observational
• performed at one institution
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El Rafei, M., Badr, S., Lefebvre, G. et al. Sacroiliac joints: anatomical variations on MR images. Eur Radiol 28, 5328–5337 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5540-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5540-x