Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility of free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of gastric cancer using a golden-angle radial stack-of-stars VIBE sequence: comparison with the conventional contrast-enhanced breath-hold 3D VIBE sequence

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the feasibility and diagnostic value of free-breathing, radial, stack-of-stars three-dimensional (3D) gradient echo (GRE) sequence (“golden angle”) on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of gastric cancer.

Methods

Forty-three gastric cancer patients were divided into cooperative and uncooperative groups. Respiratory fluctuation was observed using an abdominal respiratory gating sensor. Those who breath-held for more than 15 s were placed in the cooperative group and the remainder in the uncooperative group. The 3-T MRI scanning protocol included 3D GRE and conventional breath-hold VIBE (volume-interpolated breath-hold examination) sequences, comparing images quantitatively and qualitatively. DCE-MRI parameters from VIBE images of normal gastric wall and malignant lesions were compared.

Results

For uncooperative patients, 3D GRE scored higher qualitatively, and had higher SNRs (signal-to-noise ratios) and CNRs (contrast-to-noise ratios) than conventional VIBE quantitatively. Though 3D GRE images scored lower in qualitative parameters compared with conventional VIBE for cooperative patients, it provided images with fewer artefacts. DCE parameters differed significantly between normal gastric wall and lesions, with higher Ve (extracellular volume) and lower Kep (reflux constant) in gastric cancer.

Conclusions

The free-breathing, golden-angle, radial stack-of-stars 3D GRE technique is feasible for DCE-MRI of gastric cancer. Dynamic enhanced images can be used for quantitative analysis of this malignancy.

Key Points

• Golden-angle radial stack-of-stars VIBE aids gastric cancer MRI diagnosis.

• The 3D GRE technique is suitable for patients unable to suspend respiration.

• Method scored higher in the qualitative evaluation for uncooperative patients.

• The technique produced images with fewer artefacts than conventional VIBE sequence.

• Dynamic enhanced images can be used for quantitative analysis of gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under the curve

BH:

Breath-hold

CNR:

Contrast-to-noise ratio

CT:

Computed tomography

DCE:

Dynamic contrast-enhanced

FB:

Free-breathing

GRE:

Gradient echo

Kep:

Extravascular-to-plasma volume transfer

Ktrans:

Plasma-to-extravascular volume transfer

MDCT:

Multiple-detector computed tomography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

ROI:

Region of interest

SD:

Standard deviation

SI:

Signal intensity

SNR:

Signal-to-noise ratio

Ve:

Extravascular fluid volume fraction

VIBE:

Volume-interpolated breath-hold examination

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD et al (2016) Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 66:115–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Imaging Technology Branch and Radiology Branch of Chinese Medical Association (2016) Expert consensus about MRI examination technology. Chin J Radiol 50:724–739

    Google Scholar 

  4. Block KT, Chandarana H, Milla S et al (2014) Towards routine clinical use of radial stack-of-stars 3D gradient-echo sequences for reducing motion sensitivity. J Korean Soc Magn Reson Med 18:87–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Winkelmann S, Schaeffter T, Koehler T, Eggers H, Doessel O (2007) An optimal radial profile order based on the Golden Ratio for time-resolved MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26:68–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Othman AE, Martirosian P, Schraml C et al (2015) Feasibility of CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate. Eur J Radiol 84:2110–2116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim KW, Lee JM, Jeon YS et al (2013) Free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the abdomen and chest using a radial gradient echo sequence with K-space weighted image contrast (KWIC). Eur Radiol 23:1352–1360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Joo I, Lee JM, Kim JH, Shin CI, Han JK, Choi BI (2015) Prospective comparison of 3T MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging and MDCT for the preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 41:814–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu S, Wang H, Guan W et al (2015) Preoperative apparent diffusion coefficient value of gastric cancer by diffusion-weighted imaging: correlations with postoperative TNM staging. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:837–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamada I, Miyasaka N, Hikishima K et al (2015) Gastric carcinoma: ex vivo MR imaging at 7.0 T—correlation with histopathologic findings. Radiology 275:841–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma L, Xu X, Zhang M et al (2017) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of gastric cancer: correlations of the pharmacokinetic parameters with histological type, Lauren classification, and angiogenesis. Magn Reson Imaging 37:27–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O'Connor JP, Jackson A, Parker GJM, Jayson GC (2007) DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents. Br J Cancer 96:189–195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Teo QQ, Thng CH, Koh TS, Ng QS (2014) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: applications in oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 26:e9–e20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Turkbey B, Thomasson D, Pang Y, Bernardo M, Choyke PL (2010) The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Diagn Interv Radiol 16:186–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Consolino L, Longo DL, Sciortino M (2017) Assessing tumor vascularization as a potential biomarker of imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Gastric Cancer 20:629–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li L, Wang K, Sun X, Sun Y, Zhang G, Shen B (2015) Parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as imaging markers for angiogenesis and proliferation in human breast cancer. Med Sci Monit 21:376–382

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kershaw LE, Cheng HL (2010) Temporal resolution and SNR requirements for accurate DCE-MRI data analysis using the AATH model. Magn Reson Med 64:1772–1780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chandarana H, Feng L, Block TK et al (2013) Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver using a combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling. Invest Radiol 48:10–16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Feng L, Grimm R, Block KT et al (2014) Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med 72:707–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Joo I, Lee JM, Han JK, Yang HK, Lee HJ, Choi BI (2015) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of gastric cancer: Correlation of the perfusion parameters with pathological prognostic factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 41:1608–1614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jena A, Taneja S, Singh A, Negi P, Mehta SB, Sarin R (2017) Role of pharmacokinetic parameters derived with high temporal resolution DCE MRI using simultaneous PET/MRI system in breast cancer: a feasibility study. Eur J Radiol 86:261–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gao P, Shi C, Zhao L, Zhou Q, Luo L (2016) Differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and noncancerous tissue in the peripheral zone and central gland using the quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e5715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujinaga Y, Ohya A, Tokoro H, Yamada A, Ueda K et al (2014) Radial volumetric imaging breath-hold examination (VIBE) with k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) for dynamic gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI of the liver: advantages over Cartesian VIBE in the arterial phase. Eur Radiol 24:1290–1299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hao W, Zhao B, Wang G, Wang C, Liu H (2015) Influence of scan duration on the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters for breast lesions: a study based on CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE technique. Eur Radiol 25:1162–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study has received funding by the innovation funds for development of science and technology in PuDong new area, Fund code: PKJ2013-Y07

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-jun Peng.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Wei-jun Peng.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• prospective

• performed at one institution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, HH., Zhu, H., Yue, L. et al. Feasibility of free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of gastric cancer using a golden-angle radial stack-of-stars VIBE sequence: comparison with the conventional contrast-enhanced breath-hold 3D VIBE sequence. Eur Radiol 28, 1891–1899 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5193-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5193-1

Keywords

Navigation