Skip to main content

Validation of goose liver fat measurement by QCT and CSE-MRI with biochemical extraction and pathology as reference

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to validate the accuracy and reliability of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and chemical shift encoded magnetic resonance imaging (CSE-MRI) to assess hepatic steatosis.

Methods

Twenty-two geese with a wide range of hepatic steatosis were collected. After QCT and CSE-MRI examinations, the liver of each goose was removed and samples were taken from the left lobe, upper and lower half of the right lobe for biochemical measurement and histology. Fat percentages by QCT and proton density fat fraction by MRI (MRI-PDFF) were measured within the sample regions of biochemical measurement and histology. The accuracy of QCT and MR measurements were assessed through Spearman correlation coefficients (r) and Passing and Bablok regression equations using biochemical measurement as the "gold standard".

Results

Both QCT and MRI correlated highly with chemical extraction [r = 0.922 (p < 0.001) and r = 0.949 (p < 0.001) respectively]. Chemically extracted triglyceride was accurately predicted by both QCT liver fat percentages (Y = 0.6 + 0.866 × X) and by MRI-PDFF (Y = -1.8 + 0.773 × X).

Conclusions

QCT and CSE-MRI measurements of goose liver fat were accurate and reliable compared with biochemical measurement.

Key Points

QCT and CSE-MRI can measure liver fat content accurately and reliably

Histological grading of hepatic steatosis has larger sampling variability

QCT and CSE-MRI have potential in the clinical setting

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Abbreviations

NAFLD:

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

QCT:

Quantitative Computed Tomography

BMD:

Bone Mineral Density

pQCT:

peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography

PDFF:

Proton Density Fat Fraction

CSE-MRI:

Chemical Shift Encoded Magnetic Resonance Imaging

mDixon:

modified Dixon

References

  1. Bedogni G, Miglioli L, Masutti F, Tiribelli C, Marchesini G, Bellentani S (2005) Prevalence of and risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the Dionysos nutrition and liver study. Hepatology 42:44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM (2011) Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 34:274–285

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, Torres DM, Shaw J, Contreras M, Landt CL et al (2011) Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 140:124–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, Cusi K, Charlton M et al (2012) The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology 55:2005–2023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ong JP, Younossi ZM (2007) Epidemiology and natural history of NAFLD and NASH. Clin Liver Dis 11:1–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sass DA, Chang P, Chopra KB (2005) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a clinical review. Dig Dis Sci 50:171–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR (1999) Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological. Am J Gastroenterol 94:2467–2474

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, Gombert S, Giral P, Bruckert E, Grimaldi A et al (2005) Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 128:1898–1906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bedossa P, Dargere D, Paradis V (2003) Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 38:1449–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Badry AM, Breitenstein S, Jochum W, Washington K, Paradis V, Rubbia-Brandt L, Puhan MA et al (2009) Assessment of hepatic steatosis by expert pathologists: the end of a gold standard. Ann Surg 250:691–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, Cummings OW, Ferrell LD et al (2005) Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 41:1313–1321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SS, Park SH (2014) Radiologic evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 20:7392–7402

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee SS, Park SH, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Kim MY, Kim DY, Suh DJ et al (2010) Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations. J Hepatol 52:579–585

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park SH, Kim PN, Kim KW, Lee SW, Yoon SE, Park SW, Ha HK et al (2006) Macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living liver donors: use of CT for quantitative and qualitative assessment. Radiology 239:105–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Park YS, Park SH, Lee SS, Kim DY, Shin YM, Lee W, Lee SG et al (2011) Biopsy-proven nonsteatotic liver in adults: estimation of reference range for difference in attenuation between the liver and the spleen at nonenhanced CT. Radiology 258:760–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cann CE, Genant HK (1980) Precise measurement of vertebral mineral content using computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 4:493–500

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalender WA, Felsenberg D, Genant HK, Fischer M, Dequeker J, Reeve J (1995) The European spine phantom—a tool for standardization and quality control in spine bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. Eur J Radiol 20:83–92

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheng XG, Blake GM, Brown JK, Guo Z, Zhou J, Wang FZ, Yang LQ et al (2017) The measurement of liver fat from single-energy quantitative computed tomography scans. Quant Imaging Med Surg 7:281–291

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagy TR, Johnson MS (2004) Measurement of body and liver fat in small animals using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Int J Body Compos Res 1:155–160

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bohte AE, Van Werven JR, Bipat S, Stoker J (2011) The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 21:87–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reeder SB, Cruite I, Hamilton G, Sirlin CB (2011) Quantitative assessment of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:729–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Banerjee R, Pavlides M, Tunnicliffe EM, Piechnik SK, Sarania N, Philips R, Collier JD et al (2014) Multiparametric magnetic resonance for the non-invasive diagnosis of liver disease. J Hepatol 60:69–77

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pereira K, Salsamendi J, Casillas J (2015) The global nonalcoholic fatty liver disease epidemic: what a radiologist needs to know. J Clin Imaging Sci 5:32

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Berglund J, Ahlstrom H, Johansson L, Kullberg J (2011) Two-point Dixon method with flexible echo times. Magn Reson Med 65:994–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eggers H, Brendel B, Duijndam A, Herigault G (2011) Dual-echo Dixon imaging with flexible choice of echo times. Magn Reson Med 65:96–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Idilman IS, Aniktar H, Idilman R, Kabacam G, Savas B, Elhan A, Celik A et al (2013) Hepatic steatosis: quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy. Radiology 267:767–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reeder SB (2013) Emerging quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of hepatic steatosis. Hepatology 58:1877–1880

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Eggers H, Perkins TG, Hussain SM (2011) Influence of spectral model and signal decay on hepatic fat fraction measurements a 3 T with dual-echo Dixon imaging. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 19:573

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yu H, Shimakawa A, McKenzie CA, Brodsky E, Brittain JH, Reeder SB (2008) Multiecho water-fat separation and simultaneous R2* estimation with multifrequency fat spectrum modeling. Magn Reson Med 60:1122–1134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kukuk GM, Hittatiya K, Sprinkart AM, Eggers H, Gieseke J, Block W, Moeller P et al (2015) Comparison between modified Dixon MRI techniques, MR spectroscopic relaxometry, and different histologic quantification methods in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. Eur Radiol 25:2869–2879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Noble JJ, Keevil SF, Totman J, Charles-Edwards GD (2014) In vitro and in vivo comparison of two-, three- and four-point Dixon techniques for clinical intramuscular fat quantification at 3 T. Br J Radiol 87:20130761

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Livingstone RS, Begovatz P, Kahl S, Nowotny B, Strassburger K, Giani G, Bunke J et al (2014) Initial clinical application of modified Dixon with flexible echo times: hepatic and pancreatic fat assessments in comparison with (1)H MRS. Magn Reso Mater Phy 27:397–405

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Artz NS, Hines CDG, Brunner ST, Agni RM, Kuhn JP, Roldan-Alzate A, Chen GH et al (2012) Quantification of hepatic steatosis with dual-energy computed tomography: Comparison with tissue reference standards and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the ob/ob mouse. Invest Radiol 47:603–610

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kramer H, Pickhardt PJ, Kliewer MA, Hernando D, Chen GH, Zagzebski JA, Reeder SB (2017) Accuracy of liver fat quantification with advanced CT, MRI, and Ultrasound techniques: prospective comparison with MR spectroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:92–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu CY, McKenzie CA, Yu H, Brittain JH, Reeder SB (2007) Fat quantification with IDEAL gradient echo imaging: correction of bias from T(1) and noise. Magn Reson Med 58:354–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yu H, McKenzie CA, Shimakawa A, Vu AT, Brau AC, Beatty PJ, Pineda AR et al (2007) Multiecho reconstruction for simultaneous water-fat decomposition and T2* estimation. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1153–1161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lu W, Yu H, Shimakawa A, Alley M, Reeder SB, Hargreaves BA (2008) Water-fat separation with bipolar multiecho sequences. Magn Reson Med 60:198–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu CS, He JH, Guo XD, Luo HY, Ye JR, Huang JF, Wu YL et al (2008) Meat and meat products—determination of total fat content (GB/T 9695.7-2008). General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, pp 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  39. Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang ZM, Going SB (2005) Human body composition, 2nd edn. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign Appendix

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schwimmer JB, Behling C, Newbury R, Deutsch R, Nievergelt C, Schork NJ, Lavine JE (2005) Histopathology of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 42:641–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lubura M, Hesse D, Neumann N, Scherneck S, Wiedmer P, Schurmann A (2012) Non-invasive quantification of white and brown adipose tissues and liver fat content by computed tomography in mice. PLoS One 7:e37026

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Shores NJ, Link K, Fernandez A, Geisinger KR, Davis M, Nguyen T, Sawyer J et al (2011) Non-contrasted computed tomography for the accurate measurement of liver steatosis in obese patients. Dig Dis Sci 56:2145–2151

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang Y, Guo Z, Li D, Zhao HZ, Liu QH, Yu AH, Zhao YW et al (2012) Low-dose radiation in lumbar bone mineral density measurement by QCT. Chin J Osteoporos 18:992–995

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang L, Wang W, Xu L, Cheng XG, Ma YM, Liu D, Guo Z et al (2013) Relation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue to bone mineral density in Chinese women. Int J Endocrinol 2013:378632

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Runge JH, Bakker PJ, Gaemers IC, Verheij J, Hakvoort TB, Ottenhoff R, Nederveen AJ et al (2014) Measuring liver triglyceride content in mice: non-invasive magnetic resonance methods as an alternative to histopathology. MAGMA 27:317–327

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hijona E, Sanchez-Gonzalez J, Alustiza JM, Hijona L, Arenas J, Garcia E, Rojas N et al (2012) Accurate fat fraction quantification by multiecho gradient-recalled-echo magnetic resonance at 1.5 T in rats with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Radiol 81:1122–1127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hines CDG, Yu HZ, Shimakawa A, McKenzie CA, Warner TF, Brittain JH, Reeder SB (2010) Quantification of hepatic steatosis with 3T MR imaging: Validation in ob/ob mice. Radiology 254:119–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bannas P, Kramer H, Hernando D, Agni R, Cunningham AM, Mandal R, Motosugi U et al (2015) Quantitative MR imaging of hepatic steatosis: validation in ex vivo human livers. Hepatology 62:1444–1455

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our study participants for contributing with their time and efforts. We wish to thank Mindways Software and Philips Healthcare for their technical support. We also thank Chao Wang for his professional suggestions on statistics. The authors acknowledge the support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (81401407).

Funding

This study has received funding by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81401407).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoguang Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Li Xu.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies. Keenan Brown is the employee and stock owner of Mindways Software. There was no involvement by this company in the design, execution, analysis, or publication of this manuscript. Xiaoqi Wang is employed by Philips Healthcare. There was no involvement by this company in the design, execution, analysis, or publication of this manuscript. All the other authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Statistics and biometry

Chao Wang kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript.

One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Approval from the institutional animal care committee of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital was obtained.

Methodology

• prospective

• diagnostic or prognostic study

• performed at one institution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, L., Duanmu, Y., Blake, G.M. et al. Validation of goose liver fat measurement by QCT and CSE-MRI with biochemical extraction and pathology as reference. Eur Radiol 28, 2003–2012 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5189-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5189-x

Keywords

  • Hepatic steatosis
  • Quantitative computed tomography
  • Chemical shift encoded magnetic resonance imaging
  • Proton density fat fraction
  • Hepatic triglyceride analysis