Application of CT texture analysis in predicting histopathological characteristics of gastric cancers
- 494 Downloads
To explore the application of computed tomography (CT) texture analysis in predicting histopathological features of gastric cancers.
Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT images and postoperative histopathological features of 107 patients (82 men, 25 women) with gastric cancers were retrospectively reviewed. CT texture analysis generated: (1) mean attenuation, (2) standard deviation, (3) max frequency, (4) mode, (5) minimum attenuation, (6) maximum attenuation, (7) the fifth, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles, and (8) entropy. Correlations between CT texture parameters and histopathological features were analysed.
Mean attenuation, maximum attenuation, all percentiles and mode derived from portal venous CT images correlated significantly with differentiation degree and Lauren classification of gastric cancers (r, −0.231 ~ −0.324, 0.228 ~ 0.321, respectively). Standard deviation and entropy derived from arterial CT images also correlated significantly with Lauren classification of gastric cancers (r = −0.265, −0.222, respectively). In arterial phase analysis, standard deviation and entropy were significantly lower in gastric cancers with than those without vascular invasion; however, minimum attenuation was significantly higher in gastric cancers with than those without vascular invasion.
CT texture analysis held great potential in predicting differentiation degree, Lauren classification and vascular invasion status of gastric cancers.
• CT texture analysis is noninvasive and effective for gastric cancer.
• Portal venous CT images correlated significantly with differentiation degree and Lauren classification.
• Standard deviation, entropy and minimum attenuation in arterial phase reflect vascular invasion.
KeywordsGastric cancer Multidetector computed tomography Pathology Diagnosis Medical oncology
Area under the curve
Intraclass correlation coefficient
Receiver operating characteristic
Region of interest
Compliance with ethical standards
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Zhengyang Zhou.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
This study has received funding by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (ID: 81371516, 81501441), Foundation of National Health and Family Planning Commission of China (W201306), Social Development Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BE2015605), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (ID: BK20131281, BK20150109), Jiangsu Province Health and Family Planning Commission Youth Scientific Research Project (ID: Q201508), and Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province (ID: 2015-WSN-079).
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
• diagnostic or prognostic study
• performed at one institution
- 10.Ma Z, Liang C, Huang Y et al (2016) Can lymphovascular invasion be predicted by preoperative multiphasic dynamic CT in patients with advanced gastric cancer? Eur Radiol. 10.1007/s00330-016-4695-6
- 15.Giganti F, Antunes S, Salerno A et al (2016) Gastric cancer: texture analysis from multidetector computed tomography as a potential preoperative prognostic biomarker. Eur Radiol. 10.1007/s00330-016-4540-y
- 18.American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2008) The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. AAPM, Task Group 23. Available via http://www.aapm.org. Accessed 2008
- 19.American College of Radiology (2016) ACR-AAPM Practice Parameter for Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses in Medical X-Ray Imaging. ACR. Available via https://www.acr.org. Accessed 22 June 2016
- 20.Committee ICRP (2001) Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. Ann ICRP 31:33–52Google Scholar
- 22.Lauwers GYFS, Carneiro F et al (2010) Gastric carcinoma. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (eds) WHO classification of tumors of the digestive system:Lyon. IARC Press, France, pp 225–227Google Scholar
- 31.Yin XD, Huang WB, Lu CY, Zhang L, Wang LW, Xie GH (2011) A preliminary study on correlations of triple-phase multi-slice CT scan with histological differentiation and intratumoral microvascular/lymphatic invasion in gastric cancer. Chin Med J (Engl) 124:347–351Google Scholar
- 33.Zhang Y, Chen J, Liu S et al (2016) Assessment of histological differentiation in gastric cancers using whole-volume histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps. J Magn Reson Imaging. 10.1002/jmri.25360