European Radiology

, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 3042–3049 | Cite as

Bony morphology of the hip in professional ballet dancers compared to athletes

  • Susan Mayes
  • April-Rose Ferris
  • Peter Smith
  • Andrew Garnham
  • Jill Cook
Magnetic Resonance



To compare hip bony morphology between ballet dancers and a sporting control group and to determine the relationship with hip pain.


Thirty-three professional ballet dancers and 33 age- and sex-matched athletes completed questionnaires, including the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), and underwent clinical testing and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging to measure acetabular coverage with lateral centre edge angles, femoral head-neck junction concavity with alpha angles at anterior and superior positions, femoral neck-shaft angles, and acetabular version angles.


Bony morphological measures fell within normal ranges. Dancers had higher neck-shaft angles (dancers 134.6 ± 4.6°/athletes130.8 ± 4.7°, p = 0.002), lower acetabular version angles (13.5 ± 4.7°/17.1 ± 4.7°, p = 0.003), lower superior alpha angles (38.9 ± 6.9°/46.7 ± 10.6°, p < 0.001), similar anterior alpha angles (43.6 ± 8.1/46 ± 7°, p = 0.2), and similar lateral centre edge angles (28.8 ± 4.6°/30.8 ± 4.5°, p = 0.07) compared to athletes. Abnormal morphology was detected in dancers: 3% acetabular dysplasia (athletes 0), 15% borderline dysplasia (6%), 24% cam morphology (33%), 24% coxa valga (6%), and 21% acetabular retroversion (18%). The HAGOS pain scores correlated moderately with acetabular version (r = -0.43, p = 0.02) in dancers, with no other correlation between pain and morphological parameters in either group.


Professional ballet dancers have hip bony morphology that differentiates them from athletes. Hip pain correlated poorly with bony morphology.

Key points

• Ballet dancers have hip bony morphology that may allow extreme hip motion.

• Morphological parameter means fell within normal reference intervals in dancers.

• Bony morphology correlates poorly with hip pain.

• The risk of hip injury due to abnormal morphology requires prospective studies.


Acetabular dysplasia Neck-shaft angle Acetabular version Femoroacetabular impingement Hip pain 

Abbreviations and acronyms


Lateral centre edge angle


Anterior alpha angle


Superior alpha angle


Neck-shaft angle


Acetabular version angle


Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score


Body Mass Index


Femoroacetabular impingement




Range of movement


External rotation


Internal rotation


Magnetic resonance imaging


Repetition time


Echo time


Field of view


Proton density weighted


Picture archive and communication system



The scientific guarantor of this publication is Jill Cook. The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies: Susan Mayes is employed by The Australian Ballet. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Funding from the Eirene Lucas Foundation, ANZ Trustees, Friends of The Australian Ballet (SA), Inc., and the Duncan Leary Charitable Trust is gratefully acknowledged. Prof. Cook was supported by the Australian Centre for Research into Sports Injury and its Prevention, which is one of the International Research Centres for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health supported by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Prof. Cook is an NHMRC practitioner fellow (ID 1058493). One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in ‘Similar Prevalence of Acetabular Labral Tear in Professional Ballet Dancers and Sporting Participants’ CJSM 2016 and ‘Atraumatic tears of the ligamentum teres are more frequent in professional ballet dancers than a sporting population’ Skeletal Radiol 2016.

Methodology: case-control study, performed at one institution.

The authors sincerely thank the past and present dancers of The Australian Ballet who participated in the study. We thank the staff of MIA East Melbourne Radiology for their support in image acquisition. We thank S. Emery for assisting in data acquisition and collation. We thank P. Baird-Colt, P. Stellar, S. Black, J. Carr, J. Pugh, and W. Tardif for their assistance in collection of clinical data. We thank G. Scott and E. Scase for assisting in participant recruitment and J. Gildea for assistance in manuscript preparation.


  1. 1.
    Kushner S, Saboe L, Reid D, Penrose T, Grace M (1990) Relationship of turnout to hip abduction in professional ballet dancers. Am J Sports Med 18:286–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harris JD, Gerrie BJ, Varner KE, Lintner DM, McCulloch PC (2016) Radiographic prevalence of dysplasia, cam, and pincer deformities in elite ballet. Am J Sports Med 44:20–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K (1999) Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:281–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khanna V, Caragianis A, Diprimio G, Rakhra K, Beaule PE (2014) Incidence of hip pain in a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers: is the cam deformity a risk factor for hip pain? Am J Sports Med 42:793–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ng KC, Lamontagne M, Adamczyk AP, Rakhra KS, Beaule PE (2015) Patient-specific anatomical and functional parameters provide new insights into the pathomechanism of cam FAI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1289–1296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reijman M, Hazes JM, Pols HA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM (2005) Acetabular dysplasia predicts incident osteoarthritis of the hip: the Rotterdam study. Arthritis Rheum 52:787–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lane NE, Lin P, Christiansen L et al (2000) Association of mild acetabular dysplasia with an increased risk of incident hip osteoarthritis in elderly white women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Arthritis Rheum 43:400–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacobsen S (2006) Adult hip dysplasia and osteoarthritis. Studies in radiology and clinical epidemiology. Acta Orthop Suppl 77:1–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tibor LM, Liebert G, Sutter R, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M (2013) Two or more impingement and/or instability deformities are often present in patients with hip pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3762–3773CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suter A, Dietrich TJ, Maier M, Dora C, Pfirrmann CW (2015) MR findings associated with positive distraction of the hip joint achieved by axial traction. Skeletal Radiol 44:787–795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bedi A, Dolan M, Leunig M, Kelly BT (2011) Static and dynamic mechanical causes of hip pain. Arthroscopy 27:235–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:556–560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000096804.78689.c2:112-120 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sanchez Egea AJ, Valera M, Parraga Quiroga JM, Proubasta I, Noailly J, Lacroix D (2014) Impact of hip anatomical variations on the cartilage stress: a finite element analysis towards the biomechanical exploration of the factors that may explain primary hip arthritis in morphologically normal subjects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 29:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dolan MM, Heyworth BE, Bedi A, Duke G, Kelly BT (2011) CT reveals a high incidence of osseous abnormalities in hips with labral tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:831–838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Domb BG, Martin DE, Botser IB (2013) Risk factors for ligamentum teres tears. Arthroscopy 29:64–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Siebenrock KA, Schoeniger R, Ganz R (2003) Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:278–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Charbonnier C, Kolo FC, Duthon VB et al (2011) Assessment of congruence and impingement of the hip joint in professional ballet dancers: a motion capture study. Am J Sports Med 39:557–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bauman PA, Singson R, Hamilton WG (1994) Femoral neck anteversion in ballerinas. Clin Orthop Relat Res 302:57–63Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duthon VB, Charbonnier C, Kolo FC et al (2013) Correlation of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings in hips of elite female ballet dancers. Arthroscopy 29:411–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sutton-Traina K, Smith JA, Jarvis DN, Lee SP, Kulig K (2015) Exploring active and passive contributors to turnout in dancers and non-dancers. Med Probl Perform Art 30:78–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thorborg K, Holmich P, Christensen R, Petersen J, Roos EM (2011) The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. Br J Sports Med 45:478–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mayes S, Ferris AR, Smith P, Garnham A, Cook J (2016) Similar prevalence of acetabular labral tear in professional ballet dancers and sporting participants. Clin J Sport Med 26:307–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL (1973) Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 32:413–418CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klemp P, Chalton D (1989) Articular mobility in ballet dancers. A follow-up study after four years. Am J Sports Med 17:72–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cooperman DR, Wallensten R, Stulberg SD (1983) Acetabular dysplasia in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 175:79–85Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tonnis D, Heinecke A (1999) Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1747–1770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harris-Hayes M, Commean PK, Patterson JD, Clohisy JC, Hillen TJ (2014) Bony abnormalities of the hip joint: a new comprehensive, reliable and radiation-free measurement method using magnetic resonance imaging. J Hip Preserv Surg 1:62–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jamali AA, Mladenov K, Meyer DC et al (2007) Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the "cross-over-sign". J Orthop Res 25:758–765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Doherty M, Courtney P, Doherty S et al (2008) Nonspherical femoral head shape (pistol grip deformity), neck shaft angle, and risk of hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study. Arthritis Rheum 58:3172–3182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO, Pfirrmann CW (2012) How useful is the alpha angle for discriminating between symptomatic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and asymptomatic volunteers? Radiology 264:514–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lepage-Saucier M, Thiery C, Larbi A, Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC, Omoumi P (2014) Femoroacetabular impingement: normal values of the quantitative morphometric parameters in asymptomatic hips. Eur Radiol 24:1707–1714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Higgins SW, Spratley EM, Boe RA, Hayes CW, Jiranek WA, Wayne JS (2014) A novel approach for determining three-dimensional acetabular orientation: results from two hundred subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1776–1784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Anderson LA, Anderson MB, Kapron A et al (2016) The 2015 Frank Stinchfield Award: radiographic abnormalities common in senior athletes with well-functioning hips but not associated with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:342–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Palm H, Troelsen A (2010) Prevalence of malformations of the hip joint and their relationship to sex, groin pain, and risk of osteoarthritis: a population-based survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1162–1169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Inoue K, Wicart P, Kawasaki T et al (2000) Prevalence of hip osteoarthritis and acetabular dysplasia in French and Japanese adults. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39:745–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Engesaeter IO, Laborie LB, Lehmann TG et al (2013) Prevalence of radiographic findings associated with hip dysplasia in a population-based cohort of 2081 19-year-old Norwegians. Bone Joint J 95-B:279–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Frank JM, Harris JD, Erickson BJ et al (2015) Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement imaging findings in asymptomatic volunteers: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31:1199–1204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Van Houcke J, Yau WP, Yan CH et al (2015) Prevalence of radiographic parameters predisposing to femoroacetabular impingement in young asymptomatic Chinese and white subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:310–317CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lavy CB, Msamati BC, Igbigbi PS (2003) Racial and gender variations in adult hip morphology. Int Orthop 27:331–333CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R (2005) Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1012–1018CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wyss TF, Clark JM, Weishaupt D, Notzli HP (2007) Correlation between internal rotation and bony anatomy in the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 460:152–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaule PE (2010) Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2436–2444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Reichenbach S, Juni P, Werlen S et al (2010) Prevalence of cam-type deformity on hip magnetic resonance imaging in young males: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 62:1319–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Audenaert EA, Peeters I, Vigneron L, Baelde N, Pattyn C (2012) Hip morphological characteristics and range of internal rotation in femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 40:1329–1336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Siebenrock KA, Ferner F, Noble PC, Santore RF, Werlen S, Mamisch TC (2011) The cam-type deformity of the proximal femur arises in childhood in response to vigorous sporting activity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3229–3240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Carsen S, Moroz PJ, Rakhra K et al (2014) The Otto Aufranc Award. On the etiology of the cam deformity: a cross-sectional pediatric MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:430–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Agricola R, Heijboer MP, Ginai AZ et al (2014) A cam deformity is gradually acquired during skeletal maturation in adolescent and young male soccer players: a prospective study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 42:798–806CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO, Pfirrmann CW (2012) Femoral antetorsion: comparing asymptomatic volunteers and patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology 263:475–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Henak CR, Carruth ED, Anderson AE et al (2013) Finite element predictions of cartilage contact mechanics in hips with retroverted acetabula. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 21:1522–1529CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Siebenrock KA, Steppacher SD, Haefeli PC, Schwab JM, Tannast M (2013) Valgus hip with high antetorsion causes pain through posterior extraarticular FAI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3774–3780CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Boese CK, Dargel J, Oppermann J et al (2016) The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review. Skeletal Radiol 45:19–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mills HJ, Horne JG, Purdie GL (1993) The relationship between proximal femoral anatomy and osteoarthrosis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res:205–208Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hamilton D, Aronsen P, Loken JH et al (2006) Dance training intensity at 11-14 years is associated with femoral torsion in classical ballet dancers. Br J Sports Med 40:299–303, discussion 303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Papavasiliou A, Siatras T, Bintoudi A et al (2014) The gymnasts' hip and groin: a magnetic resonance imaging study in asymptomatic elite athletes. Skeletal Radiol 43:1071–1077CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hingsammer AM, Bixby S, Zurakowski D, Yen YM, Kim YJ (2015) How do acetabular version and femoral head coverage change with skeletal maturity? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1224–1233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ranawat AS, Schulz B, Baumbach SF, Meftah M, Ganz R, Leunig M (2011) Radiographic predictors of hip pain in femoroacetabular impingement. HSS J 7:115–119CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Mayes
    • 1
    • 2
  • April-Rose Ferris
    • 3
  • Peter Smith
    • 4
  • Andrew Garnham
    • 5
  • Jill Cook
    • 2
  1. 1.The Australian BalletVictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.School of Allied HealthLa Trobe UniversityVictoriaAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Physiotherapy School of Primary Health Care Faculty of MedicineNursing and Health Sciences Monash University - Peninsula CampusVictoriaAustralia
  4. 4.MIA East Melbourne RadiologyEast MelbourneAustralia
  5. 5.School of Exercise and Nutrition SciencesDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations