European Radiology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 1537–1546 | Cite as

Fractal analysis of the ischemic transition region in chronic ischemic heart disease using magnetic resonance imaging

Computer Applications

Abstract

Objectives

To introduce a novel hypothesis and method to characterise pathomechanisms underlying myocardial ischemia in chronic ischemic heart disease by local fractal analysis (FA) of the ischemic myocardial transition region in perfusion imaging.

Methods

Vascular mechanisms to compensate ischemia are regulated at various vascular scales with their superimposed perfusion pattern being hypothetically self-similar. Dedicated FA software (“FraktalWandler”) has been developed. Fractal dimensions during first-pass (FDfirst-pass) and recirculation (FDrecirculation) are hypothesised to indicate the predominating pathomechanism and ischemic severity, respectively.

Results

Twenty-six patients with evidence of myocardial ischemia in 108 ischemic myocardial segments on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were analysed. The 40th and 60th percentiles of FDfirst-pass were used for pathomechanical classification, assigning lesions with FDfirst-pass ≤ 2.335 to predominating coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and ≥2.387 to predominating coronary artery disease (CAD). Optimal classification point in ROC analysis was FDfirst-pass = 2.358. FDrecirculation correlated moderately with per cent diameter stenosis in invasive coronary angiography in lesions classified CAD (r = 0.472, p = 0.001) but not CMD (r = 0.082, p = 0.600).

Conclusions

The ischemic transition region may provide information on pathomechanical composition and severity of myocardial ischemia. FA of this region is feasible and may improve diagnosis compared to traditional noninvasive myocardial perfusion analysis.

Key Points

A novel hypothesis and method is introduced to pathophysiologically characterise myocardial ischemia.

The ischemic transition region appears a meaningful diagnostic target in perfusion imaging.

Fractal analysis may characterise pathomechanical composition and severity of myocardial ischemia.

Keywords

Fractals Perfusion imaging Myocardial ischemia Coronary artery disease Microvessels 

Abbreviations and Acronyms

CAD

Coronary artery disease

CFR

Coronary flow reserve

CMD

Coronary microvascular dysfunction

FA

Fractal analysis

FD

Fractal dimension

ICA

Invasive coronary angiography

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

ROC

Receiver operating characteristics

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank B. Herwig for assistance with preparation of the article.

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Dewey. The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies:

Prof. Dewey has received grant support from the Heisenberg Program of the DFG for a professorship (DE 1361/14-1), the FP7 Program of the European Commission for the randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial (603266-2, HEALTH-2012.2.4.-2), the European Regional Development Fund (20072013 2/05, 20072013 2/48), the German Heart Foundation/German Foundation of Heart Research (F/23/08, F/27/10), the Joint Program of the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for meta-analyses (01KG1013, 01KG1110, 01KG1110), GE Healthcare, Bracco, Guerbet, and Toshiba Medical Systems.

Prof. Dewey has received lecture fees from Toshiba Medical Systems, Guerbet, Cardiac MR Academy Berlin, and Bayer (Schering-Berlex).

Prof. Dewey is a consultant to Guerbet and one of the principal investigators of multicentre studies (CORE-64 and 320) on coronary CT angiography sponsored by Toshiba Medical Systems. He is also the editor of Coronary CT Angiography and Cardiac CT, both published by Springer, and offers hands-on workshops on cardiovascular imaging (www.ct-kurs.de). Prof. Dewey is an associate editor of Radiology and European Radiology.

Institutional master research agreements exist with Siemens Medical Solutions, Philips Medical Systems, and Toshiba Medical Systems. The terms of these arrangements are managed by the legal department of Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. The multicentre CORE-320 study was supported by a grant from Toshiba Medical Systems. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. None of the MR imaging substudy subjects have been previously reported. Methodology: prospective, clinical study, performed at one institution. The authors have filed a patent application for the presented invention (10 2015 217 519.7).

Supplementary material

330_2016_4492_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (234 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 234 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Maseri A, Crea F, Kaski JC, Crake T (1991) Mechanisms of angina pectoris in syndrome X. J Am Coll Cardiol 17:499–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cannon RO 3rd, Watson RM, Rosing DR, Epstein SE (1983) Angina caused by reduced vasodilator reserve of the small coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1:1359–1373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marzilli M, Merz CN, Boden WE et al (2012) Obstructive coronary atherosclerosis and ischemic heart disease: an elusive link! J Am Coll Cardiol 60:951–956CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Komaru T, Kanatsuka H, Shirato K (2000) Coronary microcirculation: physiology and pharmacology. Pharmacol Ther 86:217–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duncker DJ, Bache RJ (2000) Regulation of coronary vasomotor tone under normal conditions and during acute myocardial hypoperfusion. Pharmacol Ther 86:87–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Camici PG, d’Amati G, Rimoldi O (2015) Coronary microvascular dysfunction: mechanisms and functional assessment. Nat Rev Cardiol 12:48–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Camici PG, Crea F (2007) Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 356:830–840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michallek F, Dewey M (2014) Fractal analysis in radiological and nuclear medicine perfusion imaging: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 24:60–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goh V, Sanghera B, Wellsted DM, Sundin J, Halligan S (2009) Assessment of the spatial pattern of colorectal tumour perfusion estimated at perfusion CT using two-dimensional fractal analysis. Eur Radiol 19:1358–1365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herrmann J, Kaski JC, Lerman A (2012) Coronary microvascular dysfunction in the clinical setting: from mystery to reality. Eur Heart J 33:2771–2782bCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bauer WR, Hiller KH, Galuppo P et al (2001) Fast high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates fractality of myocardial perfusion in microscopic dimensions. Circ Res 88:340–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bassingthwaighte JB, King RB, Roger SA (1989) Fractal nature of regional myocardial blood flow heterogeneity. Circ Res 65:578–590CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verani MS (1991) Pharmacological stress with adenosine for myocardial perfusion imaging. Semin Nucl Med 21:266–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Novianto S, Suzuki Y, Maeda J (2003) Near optimum estimation of local fractal dimension for image segmentation. Pattern Recognit Lett 24:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vavere AL, Simon GG, George RT et al (2011) Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320 row detector computed tomography: design and implementation of the CORE320 multicenter, multinational diagnostic study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:370–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available via http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
  18. 18.
    Gould KL, Johnson NP, Bateman TM et al (2013) Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:1639–1653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murthy VL, Naya M, Taqueti VR et al (2014) Effects of sex on coronary microvascular dysfunction and cardiac outcomes. Circulation 129:2518–2527CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Borgulya G, Mahrholdt H, Kaski JC, Sechtem U (2012) High prevalence of a pathological response to acetylcholine testing in patients with stable angina pectoris and unobstructed coronary arteries. The ACOVA Study (Abnormal COronary VAsomotion in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries). J Am Coll Cardiol 59:655–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Varga-Szemes A, Muscogiuri G, Schoepf UJ et al (2015) Clinical feasibility of a myocardial signal intensity threshold-based semi-automated cardiac magnetic resonance segmentation method. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3952-4 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Greenwood JP, Motwani M, Maredia N et al (2014) Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease from the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease (CE-MARC) trial. Circulation 129:1129–1138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klem I, Greulich S, Heitner JF et al (2008) Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:436–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pontone G, Andreini D, Bertella E et al (2015) Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a mid-term follow-up study. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4064-x Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thomson LE, Wei J, Agarwal M et al (2015) Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index is reduced in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored study from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002481
  26. 26.
    Kim HW, Van Assche L, Jennings RB et al (2015) Relationship of T2-weighted MRI myocardial hyperintensity and the ischemic area-at-risk. Circ Res 117:254–265CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hsu LY, Groves DW, Aletras AH, Kellman P, Arai AE (2012) A quantitative pixel-wise measurement of myocardial blood flow by contrast-enhanced first-pass CMR perfusion imaging: microsphere validation in dogs and feasibility study in humans. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:154–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Uren NG, Melin JA, De Bruyne B, Wijns W, Baudhuin T, Camici PG (1994) Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 330:1782–1788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bateman TM, Case JA (2015) Variability in normal myocardial blood flow measurements: physiologic, methodologic, or protocol related? J Nucl Cardiol 22:85–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bassingthwaighte JB, Beard DA, Li Z (2001) The mechanical and metabolic basis of myocardial blood flow heterogeneity. Basic Res Cardiol 96:582–594CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL (2013) Coronary anatomy to predict physiology: fundamental limits. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:817–832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Radiology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institut für RadiologieBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations