Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Low-Dose CT of the Paranasal Sinuses: Minimizing X-Ray Exposure with Spectral Shaping

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Shaping the energy spectrum of the X-ray beam has been shown to be beneficial in low-dose CT. This study’s aim was to investigate dose and image quality of tin filtration at 100 kV for pre-operative planning in low-dose paranasal CT imaging in a large patient cohort.

Methods

In a prospective trial, 129 patients were included. 64 patients were randomly assigned to the study protocol (100 kV with additional tin filtration, 150mAs, 192x0.6-mm slice collimation) and 65 patients to the standard low-dose protocol (100 kV, 50mAs, 128 × 0.6-mm slice collimation). To assess the image quality, subjective parameters were evaluated using a five-point scale. This scale was applied on overall image quality and contour delineation of critical anatomical structures.

Results

All scans were of diagnostic image quality. Bony structures were of good diagnostic image quality in both groups, soft tissues were of sufficient diagnostic image quality in the study group because of a high level of noise. Radiation exposure was very low in both groups, but significantly lower in the study group (CTDIvol 1.2 mGy vs. 4.4 mGy, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Spectral optimization (tin filtration at 100 kV) allows for visualization of the paranasal sinus with sufficient image quality at a very low radiation exposure.

Key Points

Spectral optimization (tin filtration) is beneficial to low-dose parasinus CT

Tin filtration at 100 kV yields sufficient image quality for pre-operative planning

Diagnostic parasinus CT can be performed with an effective dose <0.05 mSv

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hopper RA, Salemy S, Sze RW (2006) Diagnosis of midface fractures with CT: what the surgeon needs to know. Radiographics 26:783–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Duvoisin B, Landry M, Chapuis L, Krayenbuhl M, Schnyder P (1991) Low-dose CT and inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses. Neuroradiology 33:4036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tack D, Widelec J, De Maertelaer V, Bailly JM, Delcour C, Gevenois PA (2003) Comparison between low-dose and standard-dose multidetector CT in patients with suspected chronic sinusitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:939–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaur J, Chopra R (2010) Three dimensional CT reconstruction for the evaluation and surgical planning of mid face fractures: a 100 case study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 9:323–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abul-Kasim K, Strombeck A, Sahlstrand-Johnson P (2009) Low-dose computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses: radiation doses and reliability analysis. Am J Otolaryngol 32:47–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoang JK, Eastwood JD, Tebbit CL, Glastonbury CM (2010) Multiplanar sinus CT: a systematic approach to imaging before functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Roentgenol 194:W527–W536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perisinakis K, Raissaki M, Theocharopoulos N, Damilakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N (2005) Reduction of eye lens radiation dose by orbital bismuth shielding in pediatric patients undergoing CT of the head: a Monte Carlo study. Med Phys 32:1024–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hein E, Rogalla P, Klingebiel R, Hamm B (2002) Low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses with eye lens protection: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 12:1693–1696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brem MH, Zamani AA, Riva R et al (2007) Multidetector CT of the paranasal sinus: potential for radiation dose reduction. Radiology 243:847–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hagtvedt T, Aalokken TM, Notthellen J, Kolbenstvedt A (2003) A new low-dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Eur Radiol 13:976–980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hojreh A, Czerny C, Kainberger F (2005) Dose classification scheme for computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses. Eur J Radiol 56:31–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wuest W, May MS, Brand M, Bayerl N, Krauss A, Uder M, Lell M (2015) Improved Image Quality in Head and Neck CT Using a 3D Iterative Approach toReduce Metal Artifact. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(10):1988--93

  13. Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Klein BE, Klein R, Linton KL, Franke T (1993) Diagnostic x-ray exposure and lens opacities: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Am J Public Health 83:588–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chodick G, Bekiroglu N, Hauptmann M et al (2008) Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists. Am J Epidemiol 168:620–631

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan MK, Tsai DC, Chang SC et al (2013) The risk of cataract associated with repeated head and neck CT studies: a nationwide population-based study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:626–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. ICRP (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. 2007. Elsevier, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  19. NCRP NCoRPaM (1985) Induction of thyroid cancer by ionizing radiation. NCRP report 80. NCRP Publications, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen MD (2009) Pediatric CT radiation dose: how low can you go? Am J Roentgenol 192:1292–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aalokken TM, Hagtvedt T, Dalen I, Kolbenstvedt A (2003) Conventional sinus radiography compared with CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32:60–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoxworth JM, Lal D, Fletcher GP et al (2014) Radiation dose reduction in paranasal sinus CT using model-based iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:644–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Wolfgang Wuest. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Methodology: prospective, randomised controlled, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Wuest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wuest, W., May, M., Saake, M. et al. Low-Dose CT of the Paranasal Sinuses: Minimizing X-Ray Exposure with Spectral Shaping. Eur Radiol 26, 4155–4161 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4263-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4263-0

Keywords

Navigation