Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reduction of metallic coil artefacts in computed tomography body imaging: effects of a new single-energy metal artefact reduction algorithm

  • Computed Tomography
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

We evaluated the effect of a single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm for metallic coil artefact reduction in body imaging.

Methods

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed in 30 patients with metallic coils (10 men, 20 women; mean age, 67.9 ± 11 years). Non-SEMAR images were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction alone, and SEMAR images were reconstructed with the iterative reconstruction plus SEMAR algorithms. We compared image noise around metallic coils and the maximum diameters of artefacts from coils between the non-SEMAR and SEMAR images. Two radiologists visually evaluated the metallic coil artefacts utilizing a four-point scale: 1 = extensive; 2 = strong; 3 = mild; 4 = minimal artefacts.

Results

The image noise and maximum diameters of the artefacts of the SEMAR images were significantly lower than those of the non-SEMAR images (65.1 ± 33.0 HU vs. 29.7 ± 10.3 HU; 163.9 ± 54.8 mm vs. 10.3 ± 19.0 mm, respectively; P < 0.001). Better visual scores were obtained with the SEMAR technique (3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 1.0 ± 0.0, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The SEMAR algorithm significantly reduced artefacts caused by metallic coils compared with the non-SEMAR algorithm. This technique can potentially increase CT performance for the evaluation of post-coil embolization complications.

Key Points

The new algorithm involves a raw data- and image-based reconstruction technique.

The new algorithm mitigates artefacts from metallic coils on body CT images.

The new algorithm significantly reduced artefacts caused by metallic coils.

The metal artefact reduction algorithm improves CT image quality after coil embolization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ikeda O, Tamura Y, Nakasone Y, Iryou Y, Yamashita Y (2008) Nonoperative management of unruptured visceral artery aneurysms: treatment by transcatheter coil embolization. J Vasc Surg 47:1212–1219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ikeda O, Nakasone Y, Tamura Y, Yamashita Y (2010) Endovascular management of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms: transcatheter coil embolization using the isolation technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:1128–1134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Han YM, Song SK, Hwang HP et al (2013) Images in vascular medicine. Large congenital renal arteriovenous malformation treated with interlock coil embolization. Vasc Med 18:237–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston SC, Zhao S, Dudley RA, Berman MF, Gress DR (2001) Treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in California. Stroke 32:597–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Etezadi V, Gandhi RT, Benenati JF et al (2011) Endovascular treatment of visceral and renal artery aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:1246–1253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yasumoto T, Osuga K, Yamamoto H et al (2013) Long-term outcomes of coil packing for visceral aneurysms: correlation between packing density and incidence of coil compaction or recanalization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:1798–1807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallas S, Januel AC, Pasco A et al (2009) Long-term follow-up of 1036 cerebral aneurysms treated by bare coils: a multicentric cohort treated between 1998 and 2003. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1986–1992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 24:1679–1691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lell MM, Meyer E, Schmid M et al (2013) Frequency split metal artefact reduction in pelvic computed tomography. Eur Radiol 23:2137–2145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morsbach F, Wurnig M, Kunz DM et al (2013) Metal artefact reduction from dental hardware in carotid CT angiography using iterative reconstructions. Eur Radiol 23:2687–2694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Funama Y, Taguchi K, Utsunomiya D et al (2015) A newly-developed metal artifact reduction algorithm improves the visibility of oral cavity lesions on 320-MDCT volume scans. Phys Med 31:66–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gondim Teixeira PA, Meyer JB, Baumann C et al (2014) Total hip prosthesis CT with single-energy projection-based metallic artifact reduction: impact on the visualization of specific periprosthetic soft tissue structures. Skelet Radiol 43:1237–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lemmens C, Faul D, Nuyts J (2009) Suppression of metal artifacts in CT using a reconstruction procedure that combines MAP and projection completion. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:250–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Geisel D, Gebauer B, Malinowski M, Stockmann M, Denecke T (2014) Comparison of CT and MRI artefacts from coils and vascular plugs used for portal vein embolization. Eur J Radiol 83:692–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kidoh M, Nakaura T, Nakamura S et al (2014) Reduction of dental metallic artefacts in CT: value of a newly developed algorithm for metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). Clin Radiol 69:e11–e16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Patel A, Weintraub JL, Nowakowski FS et al (2012) Single-center experience with elective transcatheter coil embolization of splenic artery aneurysms: technique and midterm follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:893–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tekola BD, Arner DM, Behm BW (2013) Coil migration after transarterial coil embolization of a splenic artery pseudoaneurysm. Case Rep Gastroenterol 7:487–491

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu C, Verhaegen F, Laurendeau D, Enger SA, Beaulieu L (2011) An algorithm for efficient metal artifact reductions in permanent seed. Med Phys 38:47–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu H, Zeng K, Bharkhada DK et al (2007) A segmentation-based method for metal artifact reduction. Acad Radiol 14:495–504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer E, Raupach R, Lell M, Schmidt B, Kachelriess M (2010) Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. Med Phys 37:5482–5493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao S, Robertson DD, Wang G, Whiting B, Bae KT (2000) X-ray CT metal artifact reduction using wavelets: an application for imaging total hip prostheses. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19:1238–1247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeong S, Kim SH, Hwang EJ, Shin CI, Han JK, Choi BI (2015) Usefulness of a metal artifact reduction algorithm for orthopedic implants in abdominal CT: phantom and clinical study results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:307–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hilgers G, Nuver T, Minken A (2014) The CT number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15:4597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng PM, Romero M, Duddalwar VA (2014) Pulmonary pseudoemboli: a new artifact arising from a commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for computed tomographic image reconstruction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:159–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li H, Noel C, Chen H et al (2012) Clinical evaluation of a commercial orthopedic metal artifact reduction tool for CT simulations in radiation therapy. Med Phys 39:7507–7517

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Guggenberger R, Winklhofer S, Osterhoff G et al (2012) Metallic artefact reduction with monoenergetic dual-energy CT: systematic ex vivo evaluation of posterior spinal fusion implants from various vendors and different spine levels. Eur Radiol 22:2357–2364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pessis E, Campagna R, Sverzut JM et al (2013) Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: reduction of metal artifacts at CT. Radiographics 33:573–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuchenbecker S, Faby S, Sawall S, Lell M, Kachelriess M (2015) Dual energy CT: how well can pseudo-monochromatic imaging reduce metal artifacts? Med Phys 42:1023–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mamourian AC, Erkmen K, Pluta DJ (2008) Nonhelical acquisition CT angiogram after aneurysmal clipping: in vitro testing shows diminished artifact. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:660–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Akira Taniguchi and Takashi Tsutsumi (Center for Medical Research & Development, Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation) for valuable technical comments.

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Yasuyuki Yamashita. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

No study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported. Methodology: retrospective, experimental, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masafumi Kidoh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kidoh, M., Utsunomiya, D., Ikeda, O. et al. Reduction of metallic coil artefacts in computed tomography body imaging: effects of a new single-energy metal artefact reduction algorithm. Eur Radiol 26, 1378–1386 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3950-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3950-6

Keywords

Navigation